MODERN TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS IN THE SECOND TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY

Annotasiya

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a qualitative and quantitative disorder of the microflora of the urogenital tract. In BV, there is an absence or decrease in the total number of lactobacilli and an increase in the number of anaerobic microorganisms, such as Gardrenella vaginalis, Prevotella, Atopobium vaginae, Mobiluncus, Bifidobacterium, Sneathia, Leptotrichia, and other BV-associated bacteria [1]. BV is common in patients of reproductive age. The prevalence of BV in pregnant women is 8-51% [2]. BV in pregnant women is caused by complications during pregnancy, in particular chorioamnionitis, spontaneous miscarriage, premature rupture of the membranes, premature birth (PR) and a deficiency in the child's body weight at birth. Globally, the rate of neonatal mortality associated with HIV reaches 2.9 million. Over 80% of neonatal mortality is accounted for by newborns with OD, 2/3 of whom are premature, 1/3 are full–term infants with low body weight [3]. In the study by X. Zhang et al. Of the 186 pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), 106 had an abnormal composition of the vaginal microflora. Patients with abnormal microflora showed a high incidence of premature rupture of the membranes (32.1%), PR (7.5%) and choriamnionitis (2.5%) [4]. 

 

 

Manba turi: Jurnallar
Yildan beri qamrab olingan yillar 2023
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Chiqarish:
Bilim sohasi
CC BY f
549-556
26

Кўчирилди

Кўчирилганлиги хақида маълумот йук.
Ulashish
Djakhanov , O. . (2025). MODERN TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS IN THE SECOND TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 1(1), 549–556. Retrieved from https://www.inlibrary.uz/index.php/ijms/article/view/72092
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Annotasiya

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a qualitative and quantitative disorder of the microflora of the urogenital tract. In BV, there is an absence or decrease in the total number of lactobacilli and an increase in the number of anaerobic microorganisms, such as Gardrenella vaginalis, Prevotella, Atopobium vaginae, Mobiluncus, Bifidobacterium, Sneathia, Leptotrichia, and other BV-associated bacteria [1]. BV is common in patients of reproductive age. The prevalence of BV in pregnant women is 8-51% [2]. BV in pregnant women is caused by complications during pregnancy, in particular chorioamnionitis, spontaneous miscarriage, premature rupture of the membranes, premature birth (PR) and a deficiency in the child's body weight at birth. Globally, the rate of neonatal mortality associated with HIV reaches 2.9 million. Over 80% of neonatal mortality is accounted for by newborns with OD, 2/3 of whom are premature, 1/3 are full–term infants with low body weight [3]. In the study by X. Zhang et al. Of the 186 pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), 106 had an abnormal composition of the vaginal microflora. Patients with abnormal microflora showed a high incidence of premature rupture of the membranes (32.1%), PR (7.5%) and choriamnionitis (2.5%) [4]. 

 

 


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Fe

br

ua

ry

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

MODERN TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS IN THE SECOND

TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY

Djakhanov Obidjon Olimovich

Email: djaxanov.obidjon@bsmi.uz https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4011-5277

Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina, Uzbekistan, Bukhara, st. A.

Navoi. 1 Tel: +998 (65) 223-00-50 e-mail:

info@bsmi.uz

KEY WORDS:

premature birth, bacterial vaginosis, pregnancy, probiotic, clindamycin

Relevance :

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a qualitative and quantitative disorder of the

microflora of the urogenital tract. In BV, there is an absence or decrease in the total number

of lactobacilli and an increase in the number of anaerobic microorganisms, such as

Gardrenella vaginalis, Prevotella, Atopobium vaginae, Mobiluncus, Bifidobacterium,

Sneathia, Leptotrichia, and other BV-associated bacteria [1]. BV is common in patients of

reproductive age. The prevalence of BV in pregnant women is 8-51% [2]. BV in pregnant

women is caused by complications during pregnancy, in particular chorioamnionitis,

spontaneous miscarriage, premature rupture of the membranes, premature birth (PR) and a

deficiency in the child's div weight at birth. Globally, the rate of neonatal mortality

associated with HIV reaches 2.9 million. Over 80% of neonatal mortality is accounted for by

newborns with OD, 2/3 of whom are premature, 1/3 are full–term infants with low div

weight [3]. In the study by X. Zhang et al. Of the 186 pregnant women with gestational

diabetes mellitus (GDM), 106 had an abnormal composition of the vaginal microflora.

Patients with abnormal microflora showed a high incidence of premature rupture of the

membranes (32.1%), PR (7.5%) and choriamnionitis (2.5%) [4].

The Amsel criteria are considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of BV. They are

widely used in clinical practice [6].

Currently, the standard treatment regimen for BV is the antibiotics clindamycin and

metronidazole. Research results have shown that the recovery rate after antibiotic treatment

increases to 80-90% [7]. In a retrospective study, E. Solgi et al. 185 pregnant women

participated (gestation period – 25 weeks). The patients were divided into three groups. 40

pregnant women in the first group took an oral probiotic containing L. acidophilus, L.

plantarum, L. frementum and L. gasseri for up to 37 weeks. 40 pregnant women of the

second group received vaginally a probiotic containing L. plantarum, L. acidophilus, L.

rhamnosus, L. gasseri, up to 37 weeks. The control group patients did not receive treatment.

According to the results, PR occurred in 28 (26.7%) patients of the control group, 12 (30%)

patients of the second and 9 (22.5%) patients of the first group [8]. In the study by N.

Stojanovich et al. 60 pregnant women participated. 30 patients received a probiotic

containing L. rhamnosus BMX 54 vaginally, one capsule once a week for 12 weeks. 30

pregnant women did not receive treatment. Every month (three follow-up visits), pregnant

women underwent smear tests on the vaginal microflora, measured the pH of the vagina, and

the length of the cervix.


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Fe

br

ua

ry

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

The aim

- is to evaluate the effectiveness of modern treatment methods for patients with

bacterial vaginosis (BV) in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Table 1. Characteristics of the studied patients

Table 2. Comparison of age (full years) in pregnant women with complications

Table 3. Assessment of changes in indicators in groups, GE/ml

Table 4. Efficacy criteria after treatment in groups for a period of 30 weeks

Material and methods

. The study was conducted at the women's clinic in Lobnya, Moscow

region, from January to November 2022 (scientific supervisor – Doctor of Medicine,


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Fe

br

ua

ry

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Professor I.B. Manukhin). The study involved 50 pregnant women of the second trimester

with clinical symptoms of BV. All patients signed a voluntary informed consent. The criteria

for inclusion in the study were the age of 18-45 years, the established diagnosis of BV,

pregnant women of the second trimester, a single pregnancy, and the presence of signed

informed consent. Criteria for non-inclusion: pregnant women of the first or third trimester,

detection of sexually transmitted infections during pregnancy, drug intolerance, therapy with

other vaginal drugs, erroneous inclusion. Exclusion criteria: chronic concomitant diseases in

the stage of decompensation, acute psychotic diseases (psychosis, hallucinations), refusal to

participate in the study.

The study included three stages:

Stage I – diagnostics;

Stage II – treatment;

Stage III – observation.

The first stage (diagnosis) included the collection of anamnesis, gynecological examination,

assessment according to the Amsel criteria (discharge from the genital tract with an

unpleasant fishy odor, an increase in pH above 4.5, a positive amine test, detection of key

cells). A microscopic examination of the vaginal microflora smear was performed. Criteria

for evaluating smear results: detection of key cells and absence or slight increase of white

blood cells. The biocenosis of the vagina was studied using the AmpliSens® Florocenosis

test performed on the AmpliSens® PCR test system in real time. The study was conducted

in the laboratory of the CMD (Center for Molecular Diagnostics) of the Central Research

Institute of Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor. The levels of Lactobacillus spp., G. vaginalis,

A. vaginae, Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Ureaplasma

parvum, U. urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Candida albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and

C. parapsilosis/tropicalis were determined by PCR.

The second stage (treatment) took seven days. On the tenth day after the end of therapy, a

follow-up examination was performed: the Amsel criteria were evaluated, a microscopic

examination of the vaginal smear and the AmpliSens® Florocenosis test were performed. In

pregnant women of both groups, clinical and microbiological studies of the vaginal smear

were performed at 30 weeks, and S. agalactiae was inoculated at 35-37 weeks of gestation.

At the third stage, the course and outcome of pregnancy (the method of delivery) were

monitored.

The patients were divided into equal groups by random sampling. In the first group, therapy

was prescribed in the presence of three Amsel criteria and based on the results of the

AmpliSens® Florocenosis test (Lactobacillus spp. < 105 GE/ml, an increase in the amount

of G. vaginalis, A. vaginae > 105 GE/ml). Patients with BV in this group received at the

same time the probiotic Lactoginal – one capsule twice a day (morning and evening) and

clindamycin – one candle at night. In the second group, therapy was prescribed based on

three Amsel criteria and the results of the AmpliSens® Florocenosis test (Lactobacillus spp.

104 GE/ml, G. vaginalis, A. vaginae > 105 GE/ml). The patients in this group received only


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Fe

br

ua

ry

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

the probiotic Lactoginal, one capsule twice a day (morning and evening). As already noted,

the duration of treatment in both groups was seven days.

All pregnant women presented clinical complaints of discharge from the genital tract with an

unpleasant fishy odor in abundance, itching and burning. Among the patients of the studied

groups, BV was diagnosed based on three or four signs of Amsel and the results of PCR

diagnostics (AmpliSens® Florocenosis). Complaints of discharge with a fishy odor were

noted in 50 (100%) patients of both groups. In the first group, itching was observed in 5

(20%) patients, burning in 20 (80%). In the second group, itching was not observed, burning

occurred in 10 (40%) pregnant women.

The effectiveness of treatment was assessed on the basis of clinical (complaints,

examination, gynecological examination) and laboratory data (Amsel criteria), the results of

microscopic examination of the vaginal smear and vaginal microflora using the AmpliSens®

Florocenosis test. The criterion of effectiveness was considered to be the absence of clinical

symptoms: less than three Amsel criteria, the absence of key cells in the vaginal smear, a

decrease in the titer of G. vaginalis and an increase in the content of Lactobacillus spp.

according to the AmpliSens® Florocenosis test. Statistical processing of the obtained data

was carried out using the IBM SPSS STATISTICS 23 program. Quantitative indicators were

checked for the normality of the distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov criterion and

compared using the paired Student t-test. A 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used for

the odds. The results obtained are presented as the arithmetic mean (M) and the standard

deviation (± SD). The differences at p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results :

The average age in the studied groups was 28 ± 5 years (18-45 years). When collecting

anamnesis, it was found that 21 (42%) patients had their first pregnancy, and 29 (58%) had a

repeat pregnancy. Pregnancy occurred naturally in 48 (96%) patients, and after in vitro

fertilization (IVF) in 2 (4%) patients. All pregnant women took folic acid at a dose of 400

mg (up to 13 weeks of pregnancy), potassium iodide 200 mg, and colecalciferol 2000 units.

After 13 weeks, pregnant women received multivitamins (folic acid + metapholine +

docosahexaenoic acid), potassium iodide 200 mg and colecalciferol 2000 units. 15 (30%)

patients had mild toxicosis in the first trimester. Pregnant women complained of vomiting

up to five times a day, nausea, decreased appetite, weakness, and fatigue.

The patients underwent drug therapy: biologically active additives (magnesium lactate,

ginger root extract, pyridoxine hydrochloride), one capsule twice a day, artichoke leaf

extract 200 mg, two tablets three times a day for 14 days. 13 (26%) patients were diagnosed

with a threat of termination of pregnancy based on complaints (pulling pain in the lower

abdomen and spotting from the genital tract). GSD was detected in 28 (56%) pregnant

women after a glucose tolerance test. Pregnant women with GDM were prescribed diet

therapy. 46 (92%) patients had mild anemia. 4 (8%) patients had no anemia. Pregnant

women were prescribed therapy with Fe(III) hydroxide polymaltose.

The average age of pregnant women with toxicosis and the threat of termination of

pregnancy was 29.5 ± 3.6 and 29.6 ± 6.9 years, respectively, pregnant women with GDM

and mild anemia – 27 ± 5.7 and 28 ± 0.6 years, respectively.


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Fe

br

ua

ry

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Before treatment, patients in both groups (100%) had positive Amsel criteria: pH > 4.5 and a

positive amine test. According to the results of microscopic examination of vaginal smears,

all patients of the first group had the presence of key cells in the smear before treatment, and

the number of leukocytes was 5-8 in the field of vision. In 15 (60%) patients of the second

group, the number of leukocytes is up to 10 in the field of vision, in 10 (40%) - 15 in the

field of vision. Key cells were found in the smear of all pregnant women in this group.

After treatment with the probiotic Lactoginal and clindamycin, all patients in the first group

had no complaints, the pH was within the normal range of 3.8–4.5, and the amine test was

negative. Examination of the vaginal smear showed the absence of key cells in the smear in

22 (88%) pregnant women. The differences are statistically significant (p < 0.05). The

effectiveness of therapy is 88%.

In the second group, after the use of Lactoginal, the pH value decreased to 4.5 in all

pregnant women. The amine test is negative. Microscopic examination of a smear of key

cells was not detected in 21 patients. The differences are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

The effectiveness of treatment is 84%.

After treatment, the number of lactobacilli increased in patients of both groups. In 23

patients of the first group, the level of lactobacilli exceeded 105 GE/ml (p = 0.001), the

effectiveness was 92%, and the number of opportunistic microorganisms decreased. In 20

(80%) patients of the first group, the titer of G. vaginalis decreased to 103 GE/ml. The

effectiveness of clindamycin and Lactoginal therapy was 80%. In the second group, after

probiotic therapy with Lactoginal, 22 (88%) patients had a lactobacillus count of 107 GY/ml.

G. vaginalis was not detected in 6 (24%) pregnant women. In 19 (76%) patients, the titer

decreased to 102 GE/ml. The differences are statistically significant (p < 0.05). The

effectiveness of treatment is 76%. The content of A. vaginae in the first group was 102

GE/ml, in the second – 103 GE/ml (Table 3).

In the first group after treatment, the level of Lactobacillus spp. The content of G. vaginalis

increased significantly from 103 ± 1.2 to 106 ± 1.0 GE/ml, and the content of G. vaginalis

decreased significantly from 106 ± 1.1 to 103 ± 1.8 GE/ml. The titer of A. vaginae decreased

statistically significantly from 105 ± 1.0 to 102 ± 1.0 GE/ml.

In the second group, after treatment, the titer of Lactobacillus spp. statistically significantly

increased from 104 ± 1.0 to 107 ± 1.0 GE/ml. The content of G. vaginalis decreased

statistically significantly from 105 ± 1.0 to 102 ± 1.0 GE/ml. The titer of A. vaginae

decreased statistically significantly from 105 ± 1.0 to 103 ± 1.0 GE/ml (Table 3).

After the end of treatment, the patients continued to be monitored in the third trimester. At

the age of 30 weeks, clinical and laboratory data were evaluated in both groups, and a

microscopic examination of the vaginal smear was performed. Diagnostic criteria for BV in

pregnant women at 30 weeks of age are given in Table 4.

According to the results of a microbiological examination of the vaginal smear (leukocytes

< 10 in the field of view), the absence of key cells was recorded in patients of both groups,

the pH was within the normal range (3.7–4.5), the amine test was negative.


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Fe

br

ua

ry

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

At the age of 35-37 weeks, S. agalactiae was seeded. No growth of opportunistic flora and S.

agalactiae was detected in all patients. Complications during childbirth and pregnancy

outcomes in patients with BV of both groups were also monitored. In 42 (84%) patients,

pregnancy ended with timely delivery. Cesarean section was performed in 8 (16%) patients.

Spontaneous labor occurred at 40 ± 1.5 weeks (p = 0.001). Four of the eight pregnant

women in the probiotic group underwent cesarean section at 38 ± 1.5 weeks (p = 0.001). The

indicators are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Indications for performing a cesarean

section were acute fetal hypoxia, IVF, and a scar on the uterus after cesarean section. PR

was not registered in the patients of the studied groups. Complications of childbirth through

natural routes were not observed. The postpartum period was uneventful.

Discussion :

The results of our study demonstrated the high efficacy of the Lactoginal probiotic in

pregnant women of the second trimester. The use of the probiotic Lactoginal is associated

with an increase in the number of lactobacilli, a decrease in the growth of opportunistic

microorganisms in the vagina, and normalization of the pH of the vagina. That is, there is an

anti-inflammatory effect.

Several randomized clinical trials have investigated the potential benefits of probiotics in

gynecological and obstetric diseases. In particular, in five studies, the risk of PR was

assessed up to 34 weeks, in 11 – up to 37 weeks. It was shown that the use of a probiotic did

not increase the frequency of PR up to 34 weeks (relative risk (HR) 1.03; 95% CI 0.29–3.64)

and up to 37 weeks (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.61–2.56). 57 patients in the main group took a

probiotic and an antibiotic vaginally for ten days, 59 patients in the control group The

groups are just an antibiotic. The use of a probiotic in combination with an antibiotic in

patients with premature rupture of the membranes was associated with an increased

gestation period (35.4 versus 32.5 weeks) at birth compared with the group whose patients

took only an antibiotic [11].

In the study by L. Petricevic et al. 119 pregnant women participated. The patients were

divided into two groups:

intermediate vaginal microflora and 4 points on the Nuget scale with lactobacilli;

intermediate microflora and 4 points on the Nuget scale without lactobacilli.

The scientists found that the frequency of PR in the group whose patients received

lactobacilli was reduced (odds ratio 0.34; 95% CI 0.21–0.55; p < 0.001). In pregnant women

who received treatment, the gestation period at birth was 40.1 ± 0.4 weeks, and the

newborn's weight was 3941 ± 329 g. In pregnant women who did not receive treatment, the

gestation period at birth was 37.1 ± 2.8 weeks, and the newborn's weight was 2838 ± 816 g

(p = 0.047 and p = 0.016). The study showed the advantage of vaginal lactobacilli therapy

[13]. As the results of a number of foreign studies show, the use of lactobacilli in pregnant

women with BV reduces the frequency of pregnancy. Thus, the use of the probiotic

Lactoginal in pregnant women with BV as monotherapy improves the course and outcome

of pregnancy.


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Fe

br

ua

ry

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

Conclusion .

According to the data presented, the probiotic Lactoginal in patients with BV in the second

trimester is the drug of choice. The use of probiotics reduces the burden of antibacterial

agents on the div, increases the colonization of lactobacilli, which serve as a protective

barrier, reducing the content of opportunistic microorganisms.

The simultaneous use of an antibacterial drug and a probiotic helps to reduce the duration of

treatment, the frequency of relapses and complications during pregnancy. The method is

quite effective and can be recommended for the treatment of patients with BV in the second

trimester of pregnancy.

Bibliography :

1.

N.Z. Mammayeva I.B. Manukhin and S.D. Osmanova Moscow State Medical and

Dental University named after A.I. Evdokimov Address for correspondence: Naina

Zainutinovna Mammayeva, letuchka92@mail.ru For citation: Mammayeva N.Z., Manukhin

I.B., Osmanova S.D. Modern treatment of bacterial vaginosis in the second trimester of

pregnancy. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2023; 19 (37): 6–10. DOI 10.33978/2307-3586-

2023-19-37-6-10 Effective pharmacotherapy. 2023. Volume 19. No. 37. Obstetrics and

Gynecology

2.

Ilina I.Yu., Dobrokhotova Yu.E. Bacterial vaginosis. Possible solutions to the

problem. Russian Medical Journal. 2020; 11: 75–8. [Ilina I.Yu., Dobrokhotova Yu.E.

Bacterial vaginosis. Possible solutions to the problem. Russian Medical Journal. 2020; 11:

75–8. (in Russian)]

3.

Ruiz-Perez D., Coudray M.S., Colbert B., Krupp K. et al. Effect of metronidazole on

vaginal microbiota associated with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Access Microbiol.

2021; 3(5): 000226. DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000226

4.

Kira E.F., Rastorgueva L.I., Khalturina Yu.V., Pushkina V.V. Vaginal infections. A

two-stage treatment method. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020; 4: 201-8. [Kiga E.F.,

Rastorgueva L.I., Khalturina Yu.V., Pushkina V.V. Vaginal infections. Two-step treatment.

Obstetrics and Gynegology. 2020; 4: 201–8. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2020.4.201-

208

5.

Pustotina O.A. Bacterial vaginosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and

prevention. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018; 3: 150–6. [Pustotina O.A. Bacterial vaginosis:

pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Obstetrics and Gynegology. 2018; 3:

150–6. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2018.3.150-156

6.

Radzinsky V.E., Anufrieva V.G., Belinina A.A., Bespalaya A.V. and others.

Empirical treatment of vulvovaginitis in women of reproductive age in routine clinical

practice. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020; 2: 160–8. [Radzinsky V.E., Anufrieva V.G.,

Belinina A.A., Bespalay A.V. et al. Empirical therapy for vulvovaginitis in reproductive-

aged women in routine clinical practice. Obstetrics and Gynegology. 2020; 2: 160–8. (in

Russian)]. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2020.2.161-168

7.

Crucitti T., Hardy L., van de Wijgert J., Agaba S. et al. Contraceptive rings promote

vaginal lactobacilli in a high bacterial vaginosis prevalence population: a randomised,

openlabel longitudinal study in Rwandan women. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7): e0201003. DOI:

10.1371/journal.pone.0201003 Bitsadze V.O., Radetskaya L.S. Experience of using a topical


background image

w

w

w

.a

ca

de

m

icp

ub

lis

he

rs

.o

rg

Vo

lu

m

e

5,

Fe

br

ua

ry

,2

02

5

,

M

ED

IC

AL

SC

IE

N

CE

S.

IM

PA

CT

FA

CT

OR

:7

,8

9

combination drug containing metronidazole and miconazole for the treatment of bacterial

vaginosis and candidal vulvovaginitis in pregnant women. Gynecology. 2016; 18(6): 56–60.

8.

[Bitsadze V.O., Radetskaya L.S. Experience of using the local combination product

containing miconazole and metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis and

vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnant women. Gynecology. 2016; 18(6): 56–60. (in Russian)]

9.

Amsel R., Totten P.A., Spigel C.A., Chen K.C. et al. Nonspecific vaginitis:

diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 1983; 74(1):

14–22. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9

10.

Donders G.G.G., Bellen G., Grinceviciene S., Ruban K. et al. Aerobic vaginitis: no

longer

a

stranger.

Res.

Microbiol.

2017;

168(9–10):

845–58.

DOI:

10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.004 Padrul M.M., Galinova I.V., Olina A.A., Sadykova G.K.

Features of the risk stratification of premature birth. Health risk analysis. 2020; 1: 165–76.

11.

[Padrul' M.M., Galinova I.V., Olina A.A., Sadykova G.K. Stratification of preterm

birth risk: peculiari ties. Health Risk Analysis. 2020; 1: 165–76. (in Russian)]. DOI:

10.21668/health.risk/2020.1.17

12.

Goncharova M.A., Tsipinov R.S., Petrov Yu.A. Miscarriage of pregnancy with

isthmic-cervical insufficiency. Modern problems of science and education. 2018; 6: 150.

[Goncharova M.A., Tsipinov R.S., Petrov Yu.A. Non-extension of pregnancy during

isthmic-cervical insufficiency. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2018; 6: 150. (in

Russian)]

13.

Sinyakova A.A., Shipitsyna E.V., Budilovskaya O.V., Bolotskikh V.M. and others.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment of vaginal infections in patients with a history of

miscarriage. Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2019; 68(5): 63–74. [Siniakova

14.

A.A., Shipitsyna E.V., Budilovskaya O.V., Bolotskikh V.M. et al. The efficiency of

treatment of vaginal infections in women with a history of miscarriage. Journal of Obstetrics

and Women's Diseases. 2019; 68(5): 63–74. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.17816/JOWD68563-74

15.

Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Borovkova E.I., Zalesskaya S.A., Nagaytseva E.A. and others.

Diagnosis and management tactics of patients with isthmic-cervical insufficiency.

Gynecology. 2018; 20(2): 41–5. [Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Borovkova E.I., Zalesskaya S.A.,

Nagaitseva E.A. et al. Diagnosis and management patients with cervical insufficiency.

Gynecology. 2018; 20(2): 41–5. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.26442/2079-5696_2018.2.41-45

16.

Care A., Jackson R., O'Brien E., Leigh S. et al. Cervical cerclage, pessary, or vaginal

progesterone in high-risk pregnant women with short cervix: a randomized feasibility study.

J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34(1): 49–57. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1588245

Petrov Yu.A., Ozdoeva I.M.-B. Isthmic-cervical insufficiency as an etiological factor of

premature birth. Scientific review. Medical sciences. 2019; 2: 26–30.

17.

[Petrov Yu.A., Ozdoeva I.M-B. Istmiko-cervical insufficiency as an etiological

factor of premature birth. Scientific Review. Medical Sciences. 2019; 2: 26–30. (in Russian)]

Mammadalieva N.M., Kim V.D., Mustafazade A.T., Zhunusova D.E. and others. Isthmic-

cervical insufficiency: modern aspects of diagnosis and management tactics (literature

review). Bulletin of KazNMU. 2018; 2: 10–13. [Mamedaliyeva N.M., Kim V.D.,

Mustafazade A.T., Zhunusova D.E. et al. Cervical insufficiency: modern aspects of

diagnostics and tactics of management. Vestnik KazNMU. 2018; 2: 10–13. (in Russian)]

Khryanin A.A., Knorring G.Y. Modern concepts of bacterial vaginosis. Gynecology. 2021;

23(1): 37–42. [Khryanin A.A., Knorring G.Yu. Modern understanding of bacterial vaginosis.

Gynecology. 2021; 23(1): 37–42. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.26442/20795696.2021.1.200680

Bibliografik manbalar

N.Z. Mammayeva I.B. Manukhin and S.D. Osmanova Moscow State Medical and Dental University named after A.I. Evdokimov Address for correspondence: Naina Zainutinovna Mammayeva, letuchka92@mail.ru For citation: Mammayeva N.Z., Manukhin I.B., Osmanova S.D. Modern treatment of bacterial vaginosis in the second trimester of pregnancy. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2023; 19 (37): 6–10. DOI 10.33978/2307-3586-2023-19-37-6-10 Effective pharmacotherapy. 2023. Volume 19. No. 37. Obstetrics and Gynecology

Ilina I.Yu., Dobrokhotova Yu.E. Bacterial vaginosis. Possible solutions to the problem. Russian Medical Journal. 2020; 11: 75–8. [Ilina I.Yu., Dobrokhotova Yu.E. Bacterial vaginosis. Possible solutions to the problem. Russian Medical Journal. 2020; 11: 75–8. (in Russian)]

Ruiz-Perez D., Coudray M.S., Colbert B., Krupp K. et al. Effect of metronidazole on vaginal microbiota associated with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Access Microbiol. 2021; 3(5): 000226. DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000226

Kira E.F., Rastorgueva L.I., Khalturina Yu.V., Pushkina V.V. Vaginal infections. A two-stage treatment method. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020; 4: 201-8. [Kiga E.F., Rastorgueva L.I., Khalturina Yu.V., Pushkina V.V. Vaginal infections. Two-step treatment. Obstetrics and Gynegology. 2020; 4: 201–8. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2020.4.201-208

Pustotina O.A. Bacterial vaginosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018; 3: 150–6. [Pustotina O.A. Bacterial vaginosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Obstetrics and Gynegology. 2018; 3: 150–6. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2018.3.150-156

Radzinsky V.E., Anufrieva V.G., Belinina A.A., Bespalaya A.V. and others. Empirical treatment of vulvovaginitis in women of reproductive age in routine clinical practice. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020; 2: 160–8. [Radzinsky V.E., Anufrieva V.G., Belinina A.A., Bespalay A.V. et al. Empirical therapy for vulvovaginitis in reproductive-aged women in routine clinical practice. Obstetrics and Gynegology. 2020; 2: 160–8. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2020.2.161-168

Crucitti T., Hardy L., van de Wijgert J., Agaba S. et al. Contraceptive rings promote vaginal lactobacilli in a high bacterial vaginosis prevalence population: a randomised, openlabel longitudinal study in Rwandan women. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7): e0201003. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201003 Bitsadze V.O., Radetskaya L.S. Experience of using a topical combination drug containing metronidazole and miconazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis and candidal vulvovaginitis in pregnant women. Gynecology. 2016; 18(6): 56–60.

[Bitsadze V.O., Radetskaya L.S. Experience of using the local combination product containing miconazole and metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnant women. Gynecology. 2016; 18(6): 56–60. (in Russian)]

Amsel R., Totten P.A., Spigel C.A., Chen K.C. et al. Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 1983; 74(1): 14–22. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9

Donders G.G.G., Bellen G., Grinceviciene S., Ruban K. et al. Aerobic vaginitis: no longer a stranger. Res. Microbiol. 2017; 168(9–10): 845–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.004 Padrul M.M., Galinova I.V., Olina A.A., Sadykova G.K. Features of the risk stratification of premature birth. Health risk analysis. 2020; 1: 165–76.

[Padrul' M.M., Galinova I.V., Olina A.A., Sadykova G.K. Stratification of preterm birth risk: peculiari ties. Health Risk Analysis. 2020; 1: 165–76. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2020.1.17

Goncharova M.A., Tsipinov R.S., Petrov Yu.A. Miscarriage of pregnancy with isthmic-cervical insufficiency. Modern problems of science and education. 2018; 6: 150. [Goncharova M.A., Tsipinov R.S., Petrov Yu.A. Non-extension of pregnancy during isthmic-cervical insufficiency. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2018; 6: 150. (in Russian)]

Sinyakova A.A., Shipitsyna E.V., Budilovskaya O.V., Bolotskikh V.M. and others. Evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment of vaginal infections in patients with a history of miscarriage. Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2019; 68(5): 63–74. [Siniakova

A.A., Shipitsyna E.V., Budilovskaya O.V., Bolotskikh V.M. et al. The efficiency of treatment of vaginal infections in women with a history of miscarriage. Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2019; 68(5): 63–74. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.17816/JOWD68563-74

Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Borovkova E.I., Zalesskaya S.A., Nagaytseva E.A. and others. Diagnosis and management tactics of patients with isthmic-cervical insufficiency. Gynecology. 2018; 20(2): 41–5. [Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Borovkova E.I., Zalesskaya S.A., Nagaitseva E.A. et al. Diagnosis and management patients with cervical insufficiency. Gynecology. 2018; 20(2): 41–5. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.26442/2079-5696_2018.2.41-45

Care A., Jackson R., O'Brien E., Leigh S. et al. Cervical cerclage, pessary, or vaginal progesterone in high-risk pregnant women with short cervix: a randomized feasibility study. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34(1): 49–57. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1588245 Petrov Yu.A., Ozdoeva I.M.-B. Isthmic-cervical insufficiency as an etiological factor of premature birth. Scientific review. Medical sciences. 2019; 2: 26–30.

[Petrov Yu.A., Ozdoeva I.M-B. Istmiko-cervical insufficiency as an etiological factor of premature birth. Scientific Review. Medical Sciences. 2019; 2: 26–30. (in Russian)] Mammadalieva N.M., Kim V.D., Mustafazade A.T., Zhunusova D.E. and others. Isthmic-cervical insufficiency: modern aspects of diagnosis and management tactics (literature review). Bulletin of KazNMU. 2018; 2: 10–13. [Mamedaliyeva N.M., Kim V.D.,

Mustafazade A.T., Zhunusova D.E. et al. Cervical insufficiency: modern aspects of diagnostics and tactics of management. Vestnik KazNMU. 2018; 2: 10–13. (in Russian)] Khryanin A.A., Knorring G.Y. Modern concepts of bacterial vaginosis. Gynecology. 2021; 23(1): 37–42. [Khryanin A.A., Knorring G.Yu. Modern understanding of bacterial vaginosis. Gynecology. 2021; 23(1): 37–42. (in Russian)]. DOI: 10.26442/20795696.2021.1.200680