The Role Of The Discussion Speech Type In Stylistic Variants Of Speech
Stylistics, a subfield of linguistics, explores how language elements function across different contexts and purposes. This study examines the “discussion” type of speech within two contrasting functional styles – scientific (academic) and colloquial (everyday) discourse – with a focus on the Uzbek language. Drawing on examples and a functional stylistic framework, we analyze how phonetic, lexical, and grammatical choices adapt to context and communicative goals in each style. In scientific discussion, argumentation is typically structured, objective, and terminology-rich, aiming for clarity and precision. In colloquial discussion, by contrast, expressiveness and interpersonal engagement are prominent, with informal phrasing and emotive language shaping the discourse. In particular, Uzbek academic discussions employ precise technical terms and carefully structured explanations, whereas everyday discussions use informal language, interactive dialogue, and context-dependent reasoning. The literature review synthesizes theories of functional styles and stylistic markers, while the methodology combines discourse analysis and comparative stylistics to systematically contrast the two styles. Findings highlight a distinct stylistic typology: scientific discussions prioritize logical argumentation, specialized terminology, and clarity, whereas colloquial discussions emphasize expressiveness, common vocabulary, and pragmatic flexibility. These insights contribute to functional stylistics and pragmatics, illustrating how communicative context drives stylistic adaptation in Uzbek and offering broader implications for comparative stylistic studies across languages.