4
DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE ANALYSIS OF THE IMPERSONAL
SENTENCES IN ENGLISH
Normuminova Xulkar Zokirovna
Master's student
University of Economics and Pedagogy
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14605038
Abstract:
This study provides a comparative linguistic analysis of impersonal sentence
structures focusing on their formation, usage, and extension. Impersonal sentences, which lack a
specific grammatical subject, serve unique functions in conveying general truths, atmospheric
conditions, and existential statements across different languages. Despite their prevalence, the
construction and use of impersonal sentences can vary significantly between languages due to
differences in grammatical rules, syntactic structures, and cultural contexts.
Key words:
Impersonal sentences, sentence structure, syntactic analysis, linguistic
comparison, grammatical subject, sentence extension.
By analyzing a corpus of written and spoken texts, the study identifies the primary forms
and functions of impersonal sentences in each language, including variations in verb conjugation,
pronoun usage, and sentence extension mechanisms. The findings reveal key differences in how
impersonal structures are extended and particularly in terms of morphological markers and
syntactic positioning. Furthermore, the study explores the implications of these differences for
language learners and translators, emphasizing the importance of understanding the specific rules
and conventions governing impersonal constructions in each language. The results contribute to
a deeper understanding of cross-linguistic similarities and differences in sentence structure and
provide practical insights for linguists, language educators, and translators. By highlighting the
nuanced ways in which impersonal sentences function in these languages, this research
underscores the complexity of language structure and the importance of context in linguistic
analysis.
Impersonal sentence structures, which eschew a specific grammatical subject, are a
significant yet often underexplored aspect of linguistic analysis. These constructions are pivotal in
expressing general truths, atmospheric conditions, and existential states, and their usage can vary
markedly across different languages. Understanding how impersonal sentences are structured
and used in these languages offers insights into their grammatical and semantic systems, as well
as their broader linguistic and cultural contexts. Impersonal sentences frequently rely on verb
forms and suffixes to denote a lack of a specific subject, reflecting the language’s agglutinative
nature. French, however, employs different mechanisms, such as the use of passive constructions
and the pronoun "on," to create impersonal statements. These differences highlight how
impersonal sentences are adapted to fit the syntactic and morphological rules of each language.
This aticle employs a contrastive analysis approach, examining written and spoken corpora from
both languages to uncover patterns and variations in impersonal sentence structures. By
comparing these structures, the study aims to elucidate how each language handles the expression
of general and non-specific actions or states. Additionally, the analysis will address the
implications of these structural differences for language learners and translators, offering
practical insights into the complexities of translating impersonal constructions. Overall, this study
seeks to enhance our understanding of impersonal sentence structures by exploring their
5
formation, usage, and extension. The findings will contribute to the broader field of cross-linguistic
syntax and semantics, providing valuable information for linguists, educators, and translators
engaged in language comparison and translation work.
METHOD.
The research is structured in several phases, encompassing data collection, data
analysis, and interpretation of findings. By employing a mixed methods approach, which provide
a comprehensive understanding of how impersonal sentences function and are extended in these
two languages. The first phase of the study involved the collection of a diverse corpus of written
and spoken texts. These texts were sourced from various genres, including literary works,
academic writings, news articles, and conversational transcripts, to ensure a broad representation
of language use. The inclusion of different genres and registers aimed to capture the full spectrum
of impersonal sentence usage in each language, encompassing both formal and informal contexts.
The corpus was then systematically analyzed to identify and extract sentences that exemplify
impersonal constructions, such as those lacking a specific grammatical subject or those using
pronouns like "it" in English equivalents or "on" in French. The second phase involved a detailed
syntactic and semantic analysis of the extracted impersonal sentences. This process was
conducted in two stages: syntactic analysis and semantic analysis. The syntactic analysis focused
on identifying the structural patterns used to form impersonal sentences in both languages. This
included examining the use of verb conjugations, pronouns, passive constructions, and
morphological markers that signal impersonal usage. The analysis was facilitated by linguistic
software tools capable of parsing complex syntactic structures and identifying relevant features
of impersonal sentences. The semantic analysis focused on understanding the meanings and
functions of impersonal sentences in both languages. This involved categorizing sentences based
on their usage contexts, such as expressing general truths, describing weather conditions, or
conveying hypothetical situations. The aim was to determine how each language uses impersonal
constructions to fulfill various communicative functions and how these functions are influenced
by cultural and contextual factors. The third phase of the methodology involved a cross-linguistic
comparison of the findings from the syntactic and semantic analyses. To achieve this, the study
employed a contrastive analysis framework, which systematically compared the linguistic
features of impersonal sentences in each language. Particular attention was given to how these
constructions are extended or modified across different contexts, such as formal versus informal
settings or written versus spoken discourse. To ensure the reliability and validity of the findings,
the study employed several measures. First, a pilot analysis was conducted on a subset of the
corpus to refine the criteria for identifying and categorizing impersonal sentences. Second, inter-
rater reliability checks were performed by having multiple linguists independently analyze a
portion of the data, with discrepancies resolved through discussion and consensus. Third, member
checking was used in the qualitative phase, where interpretations of the data were reviewed by
native speakers and language experts to ensure accuracy and cultural relevance. For translators,
these structural differences pose challenges in maintaining the intended meaning and tone when
converting texts between Azerbaijani and French. Awareness of these linguistic nuances is crucial
for accurate translation and effective communication across languages. All data used in the study
were sourced from publicly available materials or obtained with appropriate permissions when
necessary. The study adhered to ethical guidelines for research, ensuring that all data were
anonymized where applicable and that participants in recorded conversations were informed of
the research purposes and consented to the use of their data. By integrating both qualitative and
6
quantitative approaches, the study offers a nuanced understanding of the syntactic and semantic
characteristics of impersonal constructions in these languages and contributes valuable insights
to the field of comparative linguistics.
RESULTS
. Impersonal sentences are often formed using specific verb forms and particles
that do not require an explicit subject. These constructions typically rely on suffixes attached to
verbs to convey an impersonal meaning, reflecting the agglutinative nature of the language. In
contrast, French employs a variety of syntactic strategies to create impersonal sentences,
including the use of the pronoun "on" (translated as "one" or "we"), passive constructions, and the
expletive "il" (equivalent to "it" in English). The analysis of the French corpus revealed that the
pronoun "on" is frequently used to convey impersonal or indefinite subjects in both spoken and
written contexts, allowing speakers to generalize statements without specifying an agent. For
example, in sentences like "On dit que..." ("It is said that..."), the use of "on" creates an impersonal
tone. Additionally, French passive constructions, such as "Il est décidé" ("It has been decided"),
were prevalent in formal texts, reflecting the language's inflectional nature and flexibility in
manipulating sentence structures to achieve an impersonal effect. This difference underscores the
influence of each language's grammatical framework on the construction of impersonal sentences.
DISCUSSION
. In language, the heavy reliance on verb morphology and suffixation to indicate
impersonality aligns with its agglutinative nature, allowing speakers to create nuanced meanings
through the addition of affixes. This morphological flexibility provides a straightforward way to
convey impersonal statements, particularly in everyday spoken language where simplicity and
directness are often prioritized. The frequent use of the pronoun "on" and passive constructions
to create impersonal meanings reflects a preference for syntactic manipulation over
morphological change. The versatility of the pronoun "on" in French also indicates a cultural
inclination towards a more collective or generalized mode of expression, which can vary between
informal spoken contexts and more formal written ones. The study also underscores the
importance of context in the use and interpretation of impersonal sentences. This could be due to
the language’s structure, which allows for fluid communication without necessarily specifying an
agent, reflecting a cultural nuance in communication style that favors indirectness or
generalization when discussing everyday events. These insights enhance our comprehension of
cross-linguistic syntax and semantics and underscore the value of comparative studies in
revealing the diverse strategies languages use to encode meaning. Future research could explore
additional languages and contexts to further investigate how impersonal sentence structures are
shaped by cultural and linguistic factors, providing a broader perspective on this linguistic
phenomenon.
CONCLUSION.
The findings reveal that while both languages use impersonal constructions
to express general truths, atmospheric conditions, and other non-specific states or actions, they
do so through distinct linguistic strategies shaped by their grammatical frameworks. The study
also underscores the significant role of cultural and communicative context in shaping the use of
impersonal sentences. These differences not only highlight the diversity of impersonal sentence
structures across languages but also emphasize the importance of context and usage in
understanding their function and meaning. Understanding the structural and functional nuances
of these constructions can enhance linguistic competence and improve cross-cultural
communication.
7
Additionally, this research contributes to the broader field of comparative linguistics by
illustrating how different languages can achieve similar communicative goals through varied
grammatical means, enriching our understanding of language diversity and syntactic variation. In
conclusion, this study highlights the intricate relationship between language structure, cultural
context, and communicative function in the use of impersonal sentences.
References:
1.
Babayev Javid. Exclamatory pronoun. III International Scientific and Practical Conference
«The modern vector of the development of science», March 02 – 03, 2023, Philadelphia, USA. 144
p
2.
Shokhrukh, T. (2022). Teaching School Children to Become Fluent and Accurate Speakers.
European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science, 8, 35-45.
3.
Ismailov B. Grammaire française. Syntax I. Baku - Nurlan, 2008, 255 p.
4.
Jalilovna, K. S. (2022). Common Similarities and Differences of Uzbek and English Fairy Tales.
European Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education, 2(1), 366-369.
5.
Jalilovna, K. S. (2022). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF UZBEK AND ENGLISH FAIRY TALES.
IJTIMOIY FANLARDA INNOVASIYA ONLAYN ILMIY JURNALI, 80-83.
6.
Jalilovna, K. S. (2022, February). A CASE STUDY ON VOCABULARY LEARNING THROUGH
READING FAIRY TALES. In E-Conference Globe (pp. 5-6).
7.
Toshkinboev, S., & Oh, S. (2024). CULTURAL FACTORS INFLUENCING KOREAN EFL
LEARNERS'MOTIVATION AND ACHIEVEMENT. International Journal Of Literature And
Languages, 4(11), 60-64.
