THEORETICAL ASPECTS IN THE FORMATION OF
PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES
International scientific-online conference
30
DESTRUCTIVE MORALITY
Oymatova Dilorom Rozimurotovna
Associate Professor, Shakhrisabz State Pedagogical Institute
Saidova Shahzoda Otabek qizi
4th year student of the Faculty of Pedagogy, Department of Pedagogy and
Psychology, Shahrisabz State Pedagogical Institute
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15624281
Abstract.
This thesis provides information about the forms and causes of
destructive behavior, its negative and positive effects on society, and its
manifestations in age characteristics. It also discusses corrective and preventive
measures for destructive behavior.
Keywords:
Morality, social environment, personality, deviation, non-
standard morality, destructive morality, addictive morality, antisocial morality,
conformist, narcissistic, fanatic, autistic, asocial behavior, self-destructive
behavior, teenager.
Destructive behavior refers to socially unacceptable, undesirable behavior
that harms oneself or others. This type of behavior usually occurs in response to
problematic situations, internal emotional distress, or negative psychological
states.
One of the most complete and interesting options for systematizing the
manifestations of deviant behavior of a person, in our opinion, belongs to S.P.
Korolenko and T. A. Donskikh. The authors divide all moral deviations into two
large groups: non-standard and destructive morality.
Non-standard morality can have a new form of thinking, new ideas, as well
as actions that go beyond the framework of social stereotypes of morality. Such a
form, although it deviates from the norms accepted in specific historical
conditions, nevertheless implies activity that plays a positive role in the further
development of society. Examples of non-standard morality include innovators,
revolutionaries, oppositionists, pioneers of some field of knowledge. This group
cannot be recognized as deviant behavior in the strict sense. In the first case, it is
directed towards external destructive goals and, accordingly, external
destructive morality. In the second case, it is internal destructive goals directed
towards the disintegration of the individual himself, his regression and,
accordingly, internal destructive morality.
External destructive morality, in turn, is divided into addictive and
antisocial.
Addictive morality involves the use of special activities or certain
substances in order to escape from reality and get the desired feeling. Antisocial
THEORETICAL ASPECTS IN THE FORMATION OF
PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES
International scientific-online conference
31
morality consists of actions that violate the existing law and the rights of other
people in the form of illegal, asocial, immoral and shameless morality.
In the group of internal destructive morality, S.P. Korolenko and T.A.
Donskikh distinguish the following: suicidal, conformist, narcissistic, fanatical
and autistic morality. Suicidal is characterized by a high risk of moral failure.
Conformist - a morality that needs individuality, is oriented only to external
authority.
Narcissistic - is guided by a sense of personal greatness.
Fanatic - manifests itself in the form of a blind devotion to some idea, point
of view.
Autistic - is manifested in direct isolation from people and surrounding
activities, immersion in the world of personal fantasy.
All of the listed forms of destructive morality, according to scientists, meet
such deviant criteria as a deterioration in the quality of life, a decrease in self-
criticism, cognitive errors (in accepting and understanding what has happened),
a slight assessment of the situation, and emotional disorders. Ultimately, they
lead to social maladjustment, up to and including the isolation of the individual.
In the psychological literature, one can also find other approaches to
classifying manifestations of deviant behavior. We rely on our own classification,
which is based on such leading criteria as moral deviations, negative
consequences of deviant behavior, and manifestations of violated norms. In
accordance with the listed criteria, we distinguish three main groups of deviant
behavior:
1. Antisocial (delinquent) morality,
2. Asocial (immoral) morality,
3. Autodestructive (slightly destructive) morality.
Antisocial (delinquent) behavior is behavior that goes against the norms of
the law, endangers the social order and the well-being of people around. It
includes any action or inaction prohibited by law. In adults (over 18 years old),
delinquent behavior is manifested, in particular, in the form of violations of the
law, which subsequently entail criminal or civil liability and appropriate
punishment. In adolescents (from 13 years old), the following types of
delinquent behavior prevail: hooliganism, petty crime, crime, vandalism,
physical violence, drug trafficking. In childhood (from 5 to 12 years old),
violence against younger children and peers, cruelty to animals, crime, petty
crime, property destruction, arson are quite common.
THEORETICAL ASPECTS IN THE FORMATION OF
PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES
International scientific-online conference
32
Asocial morality is a morality that directly threatens the peace of
interpersonal relationships, avoiding the fulfillment of moral and spiritual
norms. It manifests itself as aggressive morality, sexual deviation (promiscuous
sexual relations, prostitution, bad habits, voyeurism, exhibitionism, etc.),
addiction to gambling, homelessness, and dependency. In adolescence, leaving
home, homelessness, not going to school or refusing to receive education,
aggressive morality, promiscuity (promiscuous sexual relations), graffiti
(drawing obscene pictures and writing on walls), subcultural deviations (slang,
scarification, tattoos) are somewhat widespread. In children, it is found in such
manifestations as running away from home, homelessness, not going to school,
aggressive morality, gossiping, lying, pain, greed (begging). The boundaries of
asocial morality are especially variable, since it is influenced by culture and time,
unlike other moral deviations. Autodestructive (slightly destructive morality) is
a morality that deviates from medical and psychological norms, endangering the
development of the individual and himself in general. Self-destructive morality
manifests itself in the modern world in the following main forms: suicidal
morality, need for food, need for chemicals (abuse of psychoactive substances),
fanatical morality (for example, attraction to destructive-religious culture),
autistic morality, victim morality (victim morality), activities that are clearly
dangerous for life (extreme sports, speeding while driving a car, etc.). A feature
of autodestructive morality in adolescence (similar to its previous form) is its
indirect connection with group values. The following forms of self-destruction
that occur in adolescence are formed: a habit of drug addiction, cutting,
addiction to computers, phones, the Internet, food addictions, less often suicidal
behavior. There is a tendency to smoking and drug addiction in childhood, but in
general, the period of self-destruction is less characteristic of this age group. We
see that various manifestations of deviant behavior of the individual are located
in a single deviation of "destructive behavior" with two opposite directions to
each other or to others. Deviant behavior can be presented according to the
following scale according to the direction and degree of destructive expression:
Antisocial (active-destructive) – conforming to the norms of antisocial
groups, relatively destructive – asocial (passive-destructive)
Self-destructive (passive-autodestructive) – gradually killing oneself
(active-autodestructive).
The main causes of destructive behavior:
1. Childhood trauma
2. Attention deficit
THEORETICAL ASPECTS IN THE FORMATION OF
PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES
International scientific-online conference
33
3. Problems in the family and social environment
4. Psychological disorders (for example, depression, bipolar disorder) may
be.
Destructive behavior is a type of behavior that negatively affects the
development of society by deviating from the rules of society, failing to obey
them, and violating the laws. Destructive behavior can take different forms at
different ages.
References:
1. A. Отажонов, Д.А.Салаева "Хулки огишган болалар психологияси"
2. Нурматов Ж., Девиантология асослари – Toshkent, 2018.
3. Герасимов П.И., Девиантное поведение: Социология и психология –
Москва: Юрайт, 2021.
4. Щербатых Ю.В., Психология девиантного поведения – Санкт-Петербург:
Питер, 2019.
5. Коновалова Г.А., Социология девиантного поведения – Москва:
Академический проект, 2017.
6. Мертон Р., Социальная теория и социальная структура – Москва: Аспект
Пресс, 2006.
7. Ойматова, Д. Р. (2021). Хотира муаммосининг психология фанида тадқиқ
этилиши. Science and Education, 2(5), 973-979.
8. Ойматова, Д. Р. СОЦИАЛЬНО-ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ФАКТОРЫ,
ВЛИЯЮЩИЕ НА УРОВЕНЬ УДОВЛЕТВОРЕННОСТИ БРАКОМ.
9. Oymatova Dilorom Ruzimurotovna, . (2021). The Study Of Memory
Characteristics Of Adolescents And Methods Of Its Development. The American
Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 3(08), 15–17.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume03Issue08-04
10. Jomurodovich E. A. Possibilities of Developing Tourism in the Southern
Regions of Uzbekistan (In the Case of Kashkadarya, Surkhandarya) //The
Peerian Journal. – 2022. – Т. 11. – С. 92-96.
11. Ergasheva Y. A., Eralov A. J. Prospects of development of eco-tourism, agro-
tourism, and mountain tourism in Surkhandarya region //BIO Web of
Conferences. – EDP Sciences, 2024. – Т. 93. – С. 05002.
12. Jomurodovich E. A., Alimovna E. Y. Public Policy in The Field of Tourism in
the Republic of Uzbekistan and Its Result. – 2023.
13. Alimovna E. Y., Jomurodovich E. A. DIFFICULT ASPECTS OF TOURISM
DEVELOPMENT IN UZBEKISTAN //Spectrum Journal of Innovation, Reforms
and Development. – 2022. – Т. 3. – С. 192-197.
