Worldwide, traumas represent an actual theme of
discussion. The recognition and interpretation of
severe traumas are essential for choosing the right
treatment strategy. There are two approaches to
mark the patients with a high risk of unfavorable
evolution and death. First, to use the terms as
“major trauma”, “severe trauma” and
“polytrauma”, without ability to stratify the patients
according the severity of lesions inside categories
mentioned above. Second, to implement the trauma
scoring systems (anatomical, physiological or
mixed), when a doctor uses a mathematical
algorithm/model to calculate the risks for each
trauma patient. At the same time, according to the
articles found on PubMed/Medline, Web of Science,
and EBSCO databases, there is no international
consensus concerning the most accurate traumatic
score. This article’s goal was to revise the existing
trauma scoring systems to highlight the potential
scoring systems that in perspective can be validated
in the Moldovan medical system.