The USA Journals Volume 03 Issue 05-2021
68
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
(ISSN
–
2693-0803)
Published:
May 31, 2021 |
Pages:
68-71
Doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue05-11
I
MPACT
F
ACTOR
2021:
5.
952
‘
ABSTRACT
This article examines the concept, nature and specifics of criminal involvement. Also, some problems
in the legal norms of the institute of criminal involvement were analyzed, and on the basis of these
analyzes, proposals and scientific recommendations were developed.
KEYWORDS
Involvement in crime, criminal law, participation, improvement, criminal law.
INTRODUCTION
Radical reforms in the Republic of Uzbekistan
along with the criminal law is also constantly
improving. But that's it however, the criminal
law does not eliminate the pending problems.
Among such problems, the institute of criminal
involvement plays an important role takes
over. After all, the institute of criminal
involvement is a tool of criminal law is
particularly important in the prevention of
crime through. The full use of the potential of
Issues Of Improving The Institution Of Crime
Ahror Sharipov
Student, Tashkent State University Of Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
The USA Journals Volume 03 Issue 05-2021
69
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
(ISSN
–
2693-0803)
Published:
May 31, 2021 |
Pages:
68-71
Doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue05-11
I
MPACT
F
ACTOR
2021:
5.
952
this institution will significantly contribute to
the rapid and complete detection of crimes
that are being prepared, committed or are
being committed, and, in essence, the
prevention of crime.
THE MAIN RESULTS AND FINDINGS
In turn, this is currently the case in scientific
studies devoted to a comprehensive analysis of
the institute of criminal involvement a number
on improving the legal mechanism of the
institute suggestions developed. On improving
the criminal law the main directions of these
proposals are, first of all, its General part and
secondly, the Special part. In particular,
A.V.Zarubin[1] and E.V
Ponomarenko[2], arguing that the General Part
of the Criminal Code should define the concept
and forms of criminality, propose to define the
concept and forms of criminal liability as
"Liability for criminal involvement" in a single
norm of the General Part.
The first part of this norm deals with the
concept of the institution of criminality and
crimes related to criminality the basis for
determining liability (for involvement in a
crime) liability is provided for in the articles of
the Special Part of the Criminal Code); the
second (concealment of a crime), the third
(admission of a crime), and the fourth (non-
reporting of a crime) to explain the concepts
and signs of forms of involvement in a crime is
dedicated.
However, neither A.A. Otajonov[3] nor such a
legal regulation of the institute of criminal
involvement can have a positive effect on the
full use of the potential of this institution and
the elimination of existing problems in judicial
practice. Because, firstly, the effectiveness of a
complex legal regulation of the institution of
criminality in a single norm is not high, then the
norm can be expressed in a very broad and
complex
way
(which
complicates
the
understanding of the essence of this
institution), secondly, the norm recommended
by scientists (determination of the list of
persons not liable for involvement in the crime,
what category of crimes the failure to report
the crime is committed, etc.). we agree.
In order to further increase the effectiveness of
this institution, the correct assessment of the
act and increase the measures of criminal
justice, it is necessary to improve the
institution of criminal justice, taking into
account modern conditions. Therefore, our
laws should prohibit the use of terms that may
cause some problems in terms of content.
In order to improve this institution,
A.A.Otajonov[4] argues that it would be logical
to use the term "offender" instead of the term
"criminal" in the development of involvement
in crime and other related norms.
In turn, for acts related to involvement in a
crime the problem of defining responsibilities
and placing them in the Special Part of the
Criminal Code is an important issue in theory
and practice forms.
In this sense, for the involvement of scientists
in crime take into account the views expressed
on the determination of responsibility
deserves.
“It
should
be
noted
that
N.S.Kosyakova and A.D.Makarovs believed
that the responsibility for acts related to a
crime should be reflected in the “Crimes
against Public Security and Public Order”
section of the Special Part, which should only
provide for liability for failure to report a crime
The USA Journals Volume 03 Issue 05-2021
70
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
(ISSN
–
2693-0803)
Published:
May 31, 2021 |
Pages:
68-71
Doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue05-11
I
MPACT
F
ACTOR
2021:
5.
952
and concealment of a crime. A.V.Zarubin and
E.V. Ponomarenko, on the contrary, suggested
that for all forms of involvement in a crime, the
norms of the Special Part provide for liability,
all of which should be defined in the chapter
“Crimes against Justice” [5].
In this regard, in determining the criminal
liability for crimes related to criminal
involvement in the Special Part of the Criminal
Code, we must first take into account its object
and, secondly, pay attention to the
development of norms that serve to increase
the efficiency of the institution.
It is known that the current criminal law
provides for liability for forms of criminal
involvement in various sections and chapters
of the Special Part. For example, liability for a
crime is defined in Article 208 of the Criminal
Code as an integral part of the “inaction of the
authorities”. Indeed, the logical requirements
in this article are violated in the case of mixing
two ideologically and legally unrelated legal
phenomena in violation of the rules of
legislative technique sent For this reason, the
inaction of the authorities and the admission of
crime a special liability measure need.
CONCLUSION
About crime, which is a separate form of
involvement in crime in our opinion, the
provision of liability in one article of the Special
Part of the Criminal Code for failure to report
and conceal a crime violates the logical
requirements of the structure of the norm of
criminal law and legally contradict each other
in accordance with the rules of legislative
technique the interference of two unrelated
legal events and the individualization of liability
for these acts may complicate the possibilities.
Also, the analysis of the criminal law of foreign
countries and the results of the study showed
that the provision of liability in the Special Part
of the Criminal Code for failure to report or
conceal a crime does not rule out the possibility
of positive results.
REFERENCES
1.
Zarubin A. V. Criminal legal regulation
of involvement in crime: Author's
abstract. dis ... cand. jurid. sciences. -
Krasnoyarsk, 2004 .-- P. 5.
2.
Ponomarenko E. V. Some theoretical
and
legislative
problems
of
involvement in crime in the criminal law
of the Russian Federation: Avtoref. dis
... cand. jurid. sciences. - Saratov, 2007
.-- P. 6.
3.
Otajonov A.A. Involvement in crime:
criminal
law
and
criminological
aspects. jurid… fan. jurid. nom ... diss -
T .: 2009. - p. 129.
4.
Otajonov A.A. Involvement in crime:
criminal
law
and
criminological
aspects. jurid… fan. jurid. nom ... diss -
T .: 2009. - p. 131.
5.
Zarubin A. V. Criminal legal regulation
of involvement in crime: Author's
abstract. dis ... cand. jurid. sciences. -
Krasnoyarsk, 2004. - pp. 10–12,
Ponomarenko EV Some theoretical and
legislative problems of involvement in
crime in the criminal law of the Russian
Federation: Author's abstract. dis ...
cand. jurid. sciences. - Saratov, 2007 .--
P. 9.
6.
Уразалиев М. К. EТКAЗИЛГAН ЗAРAР
Қ
OПЛAНГAНДA ЖAВOБГAРЛИКДAН
OЗOД
Қ
ИЛИШНИНГ XУCУCИЯТЛAРИ
//ЖУРНАЛ
ПРАВОВЫХ
The USA Journals Volume 03 Issue 05-2021
71
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
(ISSN
–
2693-0803)
Published:
May 31, 2021 |
Pages:
68-71
Doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue05-11
I
MPACT
F
ACTOR
2021:
5.
952
ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ. – 2020. – Т. 5. – №.
12.
7.
Уразалиев М. ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ РАЗВИТИЯ
УГОЛОВНОГО ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
В
СФЕРЕ
ПРОТИВОДЕЙСТВИЯ
КОМПЬЮТЕРНОЙ
ПРЕСТУПНОСТИ
//Review of law sciences. – 2020. – Т. 2.
– №. Спецвыпуск.
8.
Уразалиев
М.
ВОПРОСЫ
КРИМИНАЛИЗАЦИИ ОБЩЕСТВА В
УСЛОВИЯХ
ПАНДЕМИИ–НОВЫЕ
УГРОЗЫ И ВЫЗОВЫ //Review of law
sciences. – 2020. – №. 2.
9.
Уразалиев М. Зўрликка нисбатан
қ
ўлланадиган олдини олиш таъсир
чораларининг ўрни ва а
ҳ
амияти
//Общество и инновации. – 2020. – Т.
2. – №. 1/S. – С. 236-243.
10.
Уразалиев
М. Мажбурий ижро
тизимини такомиллатириш-суд-
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
со
ҳ
асидаги
устувор
вазифа
//Общество и инновации. – 2021. – Т. 2.
– №. 1. – С. 37-43.
11.
Allanova A. A., Kaustav C. A
Comparative Study Of The Economic
Crime In Uzbekistan And India: A
Critical Analysis //The American Journal
of
Political
Science
Law
and
Criminology. – 2021. – Т. 3. – №. 04. – С.
73-78.
12.
Алланова Азиза Антисоциальное
поведение несовершеннолетнего –
объективный признак преступления в
виде вовлечения в действия // Review
of law sciences. 2020. №Спецвыпуск.
URL:
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/antiso
tsialnoe-povedenie-
nesovershennoletnego-obektivnyy-
priznak-prestupleniya-v-vide-
vovlecheniya-v-deystviya
(дата
обращения: 25.05.2021).
13.
Салаев
Н.
С.
Государственная
пенитенциарная
политика
на
современном
этапе
развития:
попытка нового осмысления цели
наказания
и
его
исполнения
//Уголовно-исполнительное право. –
2017. – Т. 12. – №. 2.
14.
Салаев Н. С. К вопросу о влиянии
историко-философских, социально-
экономических
факторов
на
реализацию задач государственной
пенитенциарной политики //Вестник
Московского
государственного
областного университета. Серия:
Юриспруденция. – 2018. – №. 4.
