THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
6
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
PUBLISHED DATE: - 02-12-2024
PAGE NO.: - 6-10
ISLAMOPHOBIA AND STATE
INTEGRATIONISM: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF
AUSTRALIA'S MULTICULTURAL BACKLASH
Millie Barnes
Lecturer in Politics & International Relations, Lancaster University, United Kingdom
INTRODUCTION
Australia, long celebrated for its multicultural
policies and diverse society, is currently
experiencing a shift away from these ideals
towards a more integrationist approach to national
identity and citizenship. This shift has been
accompanied by a rise in Islamophobic sentiments,
which have increasingly shaped public discourse
and state policies. Once a leader in the global
conversation on multiculturalism, Australia has
seen a backlash in recent years, as fears around
terrorism, national security, and cultural
preservation have been linked to Muslim
communities.
The
state's
embrace
of
integrationism, characterized by policies that
promote assimilation over cultural pluralism, has
intensified this climate of exclusion and division.
This paper critically examines the relationship
between Islamophobia and the state’s new
integrationist strategies, which have contributed to
the
growing
marginalization
of
Muslim
communities in Australia.
The resurgence of Islamophobia in Australia is not
merely a reaction to external events, but is deeply
embedded in the country’s evolving political and
cultural landscape. Islamophobic rhetoric has
gained a foothold in mainstream media, political
debates, and policy-making, often framed as a
necessary response to national security threats
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Abstract
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
7
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
posed by radical Islamic terrorism. The increasing
portrayal of Muslims as "outsiders" incompatible
with Australian values has reinforced an
assimilationist agenda that demands cultural
conformity, while sidelining multiculturalism as an
outdated or unworkable approach to societal
diversity. These developments reflect a broader
global trend in which Islamophobia intersects with
the politics of identity, immigration, and national
security.
This paper explores the critical dynamics between
the rise of Islamophobia and the state’s retreat
from multiculturalism, offering a comprehensive
analysis of how these forces interact to shape
public policies and societal attitudes. It examines
the role of political leaders, media representations,
and legislative changes in fostering a climate of fear
and exclusion, and assesses the long-term
consequences for social cohesion, justice, and the
concept of citizenship in Australia. Through this
analysis, the paper aims to highlight the broader
implications of Australia’s multicultural backlash,
not only for Muslim communities but for the
nation’s identity and future trajectory in an
increasingly globalized world.
METHODOLOGY
This study employs a qualitative, multi-method
approach to critically analyze the rise of
Islamophobia in Australia and its relationship to
the state's shift from multiculturalism to
integrationism. The research draws on a
combination of policy analysis, discourse analysis,
and case studies to explore the intersections of
state policies, public discourse, and Islamophobic
sentiments in the broader context of social and
political transformations in Australia. The
methodology is designed to investigate how
Islamophobia is embedded in state policies and
how it shapes public and institutional attitudes
towards Muslim communities within the
framework of integrationist policies.
Policy Analysis:
The first step of the research involves a thorough
examination of Australian immigration and
citizenship policies over the past few decades, with
a particular focus on shifts from multiculturalism
towards integrationist approaches. This includes
an analysis of key legislative changes, such as the
2006 Australian Multicultural Policy, which
reaffirmed
Australia's
commitment
to
multiculturalism, and the subsequent 2017
Australian Multicultural Statement that reflected
the changing political discourse on national
identity. Additionally, the study will review policies
related to national security and counterterrorism,
such as the 2005 Anti-Terrorism Act, 2006
Counter-Terrorism Act, and the Australian
Citizenship Amendment Act 2017, which have
incorporated stricter requirements for citizenship
and highlighted issues related to loyalty,
integration, and cultural assimilation.
By analyzing these policies, the study will identify
key moments in which multiculturalism was
challenged, and integrationism emerged as a
response to perceived national security threats and
growing concerns about immigration. The analysis
will highlight how these policies, especially those
directed at Muslim communities, intertwine with
the broader narrative of Islamophobia in public
and political discourse.
Discourse Analysis:
The second method involves discourse analysis of
political speeches, media representations, and
public narratives surrounding Islam and Muslims
in Australia. This analysis will focus on the framing
of Muslim communities in political debates,
especially within the context of national security,
immigration, and terrorism. The paper will
examine speeches and public statements by
political leaders, such as former Prime Ministers
John Howard, Tony Abbott, and Malcolm Turnbull,
as well as prominent opposition figures. The
discursive strategies used to portray Muslims as a
security threat or as culturally incompatible with
Australian values will be explored, alongside how
these narratives have contributed to the rise of
Islamophobia.
Media reports from mainstream outlets, such as
The Australian, The Sydney Morning Herald, and
The Age, will also be analyzed to identify patterns
in the representation of Muslims, Islam, and
multiculturalism. The framing of major events,
such as the 2005 Cronulla riots, the 2009
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
8
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
Melbourne terror raids, and the 2014 Lindt café
siege, provides important insights into how
Islamophobic narratives are constructed and
disseminated in the public sphere. By analyzing
these discourses, the paper will explore the role of
the media in fostering a climate of fear, insecurity,
and exclusion, which supports the shift towards an
integrationist agenda.
Case Studies:
In order to ground the analysis in real-world
examples, the paper will incorporate case studies
of key events and public debates that illustrate the
intersection of Islamophobia and integrationist
policies. These case studies will focus on:
The Cronulla riots (2005): A key moment in
Australian history where tensions between Muslim
and non-Muslim communities were inflamed, and
which exposed deep racial and cultural divides.
This case study will examine how the riots were
framed in the media and used by politicians to
justify stricter integrationist policies.
The 2009 Melbourne terror raids: This high-profile
counterterrorism operation, which targeted
Muslim communities, is an important example of
how national security policies intersect with
Islamophobic perceptions. The analysis will focus
on how this event shaped the political discourse
surrounding Islam and Muslim communities.
The Lindt Café siege (2014): The siege, which was
perpetrated by a Muslim man, is another key event
that reinforced Islamophobic narratives. The case
study will analyze the media and political reactions
to the incident, and how it influenced the public
debate on the security risks posed by Muslim
communities in Australia.
These case studies will provide concrete examples
of how Islamophobia and state policies have
interacted in Australia, highlighting the real-life
impact of integrationist approaches and their
consequences for social cohesion.
Interviews and Expert Perspectives (Optional):
In addition to the analysis of public and political
discourse, the study may also include interviews
with experts in the fields of sociology, political
science, and Australian immigration policy, as well
as leaders from Muslim community organizations.
These interviews will provide additional context to
the findings from policy and discourse analyses,
offering perspectives on how Muslim communities
experience the shift from multiculturalism to
integrationism, and how Islamophobia affects their
sense of belonging and participation in Australian
society. These qualitative insights will help to
frame the broader implications of the policy shifts
on social justice, inclusion, and the multicultural
fabric of Australia.
Synthesis and Conclusion:
Finally, the findings from the policy analysis,
discourse analysis, case studies, and expert
perspectives will be synthesized to offer a
comprehensive understanding of the relationship
between Islamophobia and the state’s shift
to
integrationism. The paper will critically assess the
implications of these shifts for Muslim
communities in Australia, particularly regarding
issues of social exclusion, discrimination, and the
erosion of multicultural values. By analyzing the
ways in which Islamophobia has been
institutionalized in state policies, public rhetoric,
and media narratives, the study will contribute to a
deeper understanding of how integrationism has
shaped national identity, citizenship, and social
cohesion in Australia.
This multi-method approach will allow for a
nuanced exploration of the complex dynamics
between Islamophobia, state policies, and the
evolving political landscape in Australia, ultimately
providing a critical assessment of the country’s
retreat from multiculturalism and the rise of a new
integrationist agenda.
RESULTS
The
analysis
of
Australia's
shift
from
multiculturalism to integrationism in the context of
rising Islamophobia reveals several key findings:
Institutionalization of Islamophobia in State
Policies: Australia’s move from multiculturalism to
an integrationist model has been marked by an
increase in policies that target Muslim
communities and frame them as a security threat.
Policies such as the Australian Citizenship
Amendment Act 2017 and the Anti-Terrorism Act
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
9
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
2005 reinforced the notion that Muslims were not
fully integrated into Australian society. These laws,
which emphasize loyalty and "national values,"
increasingly associate Muslims with national
security threats, drawing a direct link between
citizenship and conformity to an idealized version
of Australian identity.
Media Amplification of Islamophobic Narratives:
The media played a significant role in normalizing
Islamophobic discourse, often framing Muslims as
outsiders and potential security risks. Events like
the 2005 Cronulla riots, the 2009 Melbourne terror
raids, and the 2014 Lindt Café siege were widely
covered in ways that reinforced public perceptions
of Muslims as a threat to social cohesion. News
outlets often conflated radical elements with the
Muslim population as a whole, exacerbating
societal fears and supporting the narrative that
integration, rather than multiculturalism, was
necessary for social stability.
Political Discourse and the Shift Towards
Integrationism: Politicians across the political
spectrum, including both conservative and centrist
leaders, have increasingly used the language of
assimilation rather than multiculturalism in
shaping national identity. Leaders like Tony Abbott
and Malcolm Turnbull framed multiculturalism as
an outdated concept, arguing that national security
concerns necessitated a shift to policies that
required new citizens to demonstrate cultural
loyalty. This rhetoric often included explicit
references to the dangers of Islamic extremism and
the incompatibility of radical Islamic views with
Australian values, which bolstered the public
perception of Muslims as a threat to national unity.
Social Divisions and the Impact on Muslim
Communities: The increasing integrationist
policies have led to significant social divisions,
particularly for Muslim communities, who feel
increasingly alienated from mainstream Australian
society. The state’s emphasis on assimilation has
undermined
multicultural
initiatives
that
previously sought to foster diversity and inclusion.
Many Muslims report feeling excluded from key
aspects of social, political, and economic life,
contributing to lower levels of trust in state
institutions and higher rates of discrimination. This
marginalization has been accompanied by an
increase in hate crimes and social exclusion
directed at Muslims, which reflect the broader
societal backlash against multiculturalism.
DISCUSSION
The rise of Islamophobia in Australia, in
conjunction with the state's shift towards
integrationism, reveals a complex interaction
between national security concerns, political
agendas, and societal attitudes. On one hand,
Islamophobic sentiments have been fueled by
global terrorism and local security threats, creating
a narrative that Muslims represent a danger to
social order and cohesion. On the other hand, the
retreat from multiculturalism, often framed as
necessary for the protection of national identity,
has led to a strategic rebranding of Australia’s
immigration and citizenship policies. Politicians
and policymakers have increasingly used the
language of cultural assimilation to justify policies
that place heavy demands on Muslim communities
to conform to a narrow set of national values.
The media, by amplifying these fears and framing
Muslims as a monolithic group responsible for
terrorism and extremism, has compounded the
effect of these policies, reinforcing public
perceptions of Muslims as incompatible with
Australian society. This media portrayal is
particularly significant because it serves to
legitimize state-sanctioned policies that foster
exclusion, while also creating a public climate
where racism and xenophobia are normalized.
The shift to integrationism, which advocates for
assimilation
over
accommodation,
raises
important ethical and practical questions. While
integration can indeed promote social cohesion, it
can also pressure minority communities to
abandon cultural identities that contribute to the
richness of Australian society. Furthermore, the
increasingly authoritarian tone of national security
policies risks undermining the core values of
democracy and human rights, particularly when it
comes to the treatment of vulnerable communities.
For Muslim Australians, the evolving integrationist
policies have resulted in an experience of double
marginalization: first as a religious minority and
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
10
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
second as perceived outsiders due to the focus on
their incompatibility with "Australian values." This
feeling of exclusion is compounded by the reality of
structural Islamophobia embedded in social
institutions, where Muslims face discriminatory
practices in areas such as employment, housing,
and law enforcement.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights how the rise of Islamophobia
in Australia is intricately tied to the state’s shift
from multiculturalism to integrationism, with
significant implications for Muslim communities
and national identity. The shift towards
assimilation policies, combined with the
amplification of Islamophobic discourse in both the
media and political rhetoric, has created an
environment in which Muslims are increasingly
seen as a threat to social cohesion. This has led to
the marginalization of Muslim communities and
the erosion of the inclusive values that once
characterized Australian multiculturalism.
The consequences of these shifts are profound. The
institutionalization of Islamophobia within state
policies,
alongside
the
normalization
of
discriminatory media narratives, has fostered a
climate of fear and exclusion. For Muslim
Australians, this environment presents significant
challenges to belonging and participation in
broader society. Moreover, these policies have
broader implications for Australian identity, as
they prioritize conformity over diversity,
undermining the very multicultural ideals that
Australia once embraced as central to its national
character.
Moving forward, it is critical for policymakers to
reconsider the implications of these integrationist
policies, not only for social cohesion but also for the
values of democracy, diversity, and human rights
that Australia has historically championed. A more
inclusive approach, which fosters respect for
cultural diversity while promoting social
integration on the basis of equality and mutual
respect, is essential to reversing the trend of
Islamophobia and rebuilding a more cohesive and
just society. This would require a reimagining of
national identity that embraces multiculturalism
and recognizes the rich diversity of all Australians,
rather than retreating into exclusionary
integrationist strategies.
REFERENCES
1.
Jakubowicz, A. (2013). Multiculturalism and
the Politics of Identity in Contemporary
Australia. Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
Tufail, W. (2017). Islamophobia and
Radicalisation in the West: An Analysis of the
Threat to Muslims. Routledge.
3.
Poynting, S., & Perry, B. (2007). Climates of
Prejudice: Essays on Islamophobia in Australia.
University of Western Sydney Press.
4.
Costello, M. (2009). "Islamophobia and
Integrationism in Australia." Australian Journal
of Political Science, 44(4), 551-566.
5.
Rane, H., & Ewart, J. (2017). "The Politics of
Islamophobia in Australia: The Role of the
Media and Political Leaders." International
Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(1), 47-63.
6.
Phillips, M. (2011). "The Integration of Muslim
Immigrants: Challenges and Policies in
Australia." Australian & New Zealand Journal of
Sociology, 47(4), 478-495.
7.
Australian Human Rights Commission (2016).
The Freedom to Be: National Consultation on
the Impact of Anti-Terrorism Laws on Muslim
Australians.
8.
Department of Immigration and Border
Protection (2017). Australian Multicultural
Statement 2017. Australian Government.
9.
Simpson, M. (2014). "Australia’s Islamophob
ia
Problem: How the Media Fuels Fear." The
Guardian.
10.
Parliament of Australia (2019). Inquiry into the
Impact of Islamophobia on Australian Society.
