CAUSES OF DELAYED DIAGNOSIS OF BRONCHIAL ASTHMA IN CHILDREN AND ITS CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES

Annotasiya

Objective: To identify the primary causes of delayed diagnosis of bronchial asthma in children and to assess the impact of this delay on the clinical course and outcomes of the disease. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by analyzing 450 medical records of children (aged 6-16) with a confirmed diagnosis of asthma, who were followed at a specialized pediatric center. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (Early Diagnosis, n=210), diagnosed within 12 months of symptom onset, and Group 2 (Late Diagnosis, n=240), diagnosed more than 24 months after symptom onset. Data on initial misdiagnoses and clinical outcomes (frequency of exacerbations, number of hospitalizations, need for oral corticosteroids (OCS), and pulmonary function (FEV1%)) were collected and compared. Results: The average diagnostic delay in Group 2 was 3.8 ± 1.5 years. The most common misdiagnosis preceding the correct asthma diagnosis was "recurrent obstructive bronchitis" (71% of cases in Group 2). Children in the Late Diagnosis group had significantly worse clinical outcomes: a higher annual rate of severe exacerbations (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 0.5 ± 0.4 in Group 1; p<0.001), more frequent hospitalizations (1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 0.2 ± 0.1 per year; p<0.001), a greater need for OCS courses (3.2 ± 1.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.5 per year; p<0.001), and lower FEV1% predicted values at the time of diagnosis (75% ± 8% vs. 89% ± 6%; p<0.001). Conclusion: Delayed diagnosis of bronchial asthma in children leads to a more severe clinical course, characterized by frequent exacerbations, increased hospitalizations, and poorer lung function. The primary reason for the delay is the misinterpretation of asthma symptoms as recurrent respiratory infections. Improving the knowledge of primary care physicians on modern asthma guidelines and raising parental awareness are crucial steps to ensure timely diagnosis and prevent adverse long-term outcomes.

Manba turi: Jurnallar
Yildan beri qamrab olingan yillar 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
 
Chiqarish:
Bilim sohasi
  • Department of Hospital Pediatrics, Andijan State Medical Institute
f
150-154

Кўчирилди

Кўчирилганлиги хақида маълумот йук.
Ulashish
Zokirov , B. . (2025). CAUSES OF DELAYED DIAGNOSIS OF BRONCHIAL ASTHMA IN CHILDREN AND ITS CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES. Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 1(6), 150–154. Retrieved from https://www.inlibrary.uz/index.php/jmsi/article/view/136663
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Annotasiya

Objective: To identify the primary causes of delayed diagnosis of bronchial asthma in children and to assess the impact of this delay on the clinical course and outcomes of the disease. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by analyzing 450 medical records of children (aged 6-16) with a confirmed diagnosis of asthma, who were followed at a specialized pediatric center. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (Early Diagnosis, n=210), diagnosed within 12 months of symptom onset, and Group 2 (Late Diagnosis, n=240), diagnosed more than 24 months after symptom onset. Data on initial misdiagnoses and clinical outcomes (frequency of exacerbations, number of hospitalizations, need for oral corticosteroids (OCS), and pulmonary function (FEV1%)) were collected and compared. Results: The average diagnostic delay in Group 2 was 3.8 ± 1.5 years. The most common misdiagnosis preceding the correct asthma diagnosis was "recurrent obstructive bronchitis" (71% of cases in Group 2). Children in the Late Diagnosis group had significantly worse clinical outcomes: a higher annual rate of severe exacerbations (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 0.5 ± 0.4 in Group 1; p<0.001), more frequent hospitalizations (1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 0.2 ± 0.1 per year; p<0.001), a greater need for OCS courses (3.2 ± 1.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.5 per year; p<0.001), and lower FEV1% predicted values at the time of diagnosis (75% ± 8% vs. 89% ± 6%; p<0.001). Conclusion: Delayed diagnosis of bronchial asthma in children leads to a more severe clinical course, characterized by frequent exacerbations, increased hospitalizations, and poorer lung function. The primary reason for the delay is the misinterpretation of asthma symptoms as recurrent respiratory infections. Improving the knowledge of primary care physicians on modern asthma guidelines and raising parental awareness are crucial steps to ensure timely diagnosis and prevent adverse long-term outcomes.


background image

JOURNAL OF

MULTIDISCIPLINARY

SCIENCES AND INNOVATIONS

ISSN NUMBER: 2751-4390

IMPACT FACTOR: 9,08

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

COMPANY: GERMAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS

150

UDC: 616.248-053.2-07-036.8-06

CAUSES OF DELAYED DIAGNOSIS OF BRONCHIAL ASTHMA IN CHILDREN AND

ITS CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES

Zokirov Botirjon Qobiljon ugli

Department of Hospital Pediatrics,

Andijan State Medical Institute

ABSTRACT:

Objective: To identify the primary causes of delayed diagnosis of bronchial

asthma in children and to assess the impact of this delay on the clinical course and outcomes of

the disease. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by analyzing 450 medical

records of children (aged 6-16) with a confirmed diagnosis of asthma, who were followed at a

specialized pediatric center. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (Early Diagnosis,

n=210), diagnosed within 12 months of symptom onset, and Group 2 (Late Diagnosis, n=240),

diagnosed more than 24 months after symptom onset. Data on initial misdiagnoses and clinical

outcomes (frequency of exacerbations, number of hospitalizations, need for oral corticosteroids

(OCS), and pulmonary function (FEV1%)) were collected and compared. Results: The average

diagnostic delay in Group 2 was 3.8 ± 1.5 years. The most common misdiagnosis preceding the

correct asthma diagnosis was "recurrent obstructive bronchitis" (71% of cases in Group 2).

Children in the Late Diagnosis group had significantly worse clinical outcomes: a higher annual

rate of severe exacerbations (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 0.5 ± 0.4 in Group 1; p<0.001), more frequent

hospitalizations (1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 0.2 ± 0.1 per year; p<0.001), a greater need for OCS courses (3.2 ±

1.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.5 per year; p<0.001), and lower FEV1% predicted values at the time of diagnosis

(75% ± 8% vs. 89% ± 6%; p<0.001). Conclusion: Delayed diagnosis of bronchial asthma in

children leads to a more severe clinical course, characterized by frequent exacerbations,

increased hospitalizations, and poorer lung function. The primary reason for the delay is the

misinterpretation of asthma symptoms as recurrent respiratory infections. Improving the

knowledge of primary care physicians on modern asthma guidelines and raising parental

awareness are crucial steps to ensure timely diagnosis and prevent adverse long-term outcomes.

Keywords:

bronchial asthma, delayed diagnosis, pediatrics, obstructive bronchitis, clinical

outcomes, FEV1, exacerbation, primary care.

АННОТАЦИЯ:

Цель: Определить основные причины поздней диагностики бронхиальной

астмы у детей и оценить влияние этой задержки на клиническое течение и исходы

заболевания. Методы: Проведено ретроспективное когортное исследование путем анализа

450 амбулаторных карт детей (6-16 лет) с подтвержденным диагнозом астмы,

наблюдавшихся в специализированном педиатрическом центре. Пациенты были

разделены на две группы: Группа 1 (Ранняя диагностика, n=210), диагноз которым был

поставлен в течение 12 месяцев с момента появления симптомов, и Группа 2 (Поздняя

диагностика, n=240), диагноз которым был поставлен более чем через 24 месяца после

появления симптомов. Были собраны и сравнены данные о первоначальных ошибочных

диагнозах и клинических исходах (частота обострений, количество госпитализаций,

потребность в оральных кортикостероидах (ОКС) и функция легких (ОФВ1%)).

Результаты: Средняя диагностическая задержка в Группе 2 составила 3,8 ± 1,5 года.

Наиболее частым ошибочным диагнозом, предшествовавшим правильной постановке

диагноза астмы, был «рецидивирующий обструктивный бронхит» (71% случаев в Группе


background image

JOURNAL OF

MULTIDISCIPLINARY

SCIENCES AND INNOVATIONS

ISSN NUMBER: 2751-4390

IMPACT FACTOR: 9,08

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

COMPANY: GERMAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS

151

2). Дети в группе с поздней диагностикой имели значительно худшие клинические исходы:

более высокую годовую частоту тяжелых обострений (2,1 ± 0,8 против 0,5 ± 0,4 в Группе

1; p<0,001), более частые госпитализации (1,5 ± 0,6 против 0,2 ± 0,1 в год; p<0,001),

большую потребность в курсах ОКС (3,2 ± 1,1 против 0,8 ± 0,5 в год; p<0,001) и более

низкие показатели ОФВ1% от должного на момент постановки диагноза (75% ± 8%

против 89% ± 6%; p<0,001). Заключение: Поздняя диагностика бронхиальной астмы у

детей приводит к более тяжелому клиническому течению, характеризующемуся частыми

обострениями, увеличением числа госпитализаций и ухудшением функции легких.

Основной причиной задержки является неверная трактовка симптомов астмы как

рецидивирующих респираторных инфекций. Повышение знаний врачей первичного звена

о современных руководствах по астме и повышение осведомленности родителей являются

ключевыми шагами для обеспечения своевременной диагностики и предотвращения

неблагоприятных долгосрочных последствий.

Ключевые слова:

бронхиальная астма, поздняя диагностика, педиатрия, обструктивный

бронхит, клинические исходы, ОФВ1, обострение, первичное звено.

INTRODUCTION

Bronchial asthma is the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease in childhood and a

major cause of disability, imposing a significant burden on patients, their families, and

healthcare systems worldwide. The modern paradigm for asthma management, outlined in

international guidelines such as the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), emphasizes early and

accurate diagnosis as a prerequisite for effective treatment. Timely initiation of anti-

inflammatory controller therapy is crucial to control symptoms, prevent exacerbations, maintain

normal activity levels, and, most importantly, prevent long-term irreversible airway remodeling

and lung function decline (GINA, 2023).

Despite clear diagnostic criteria, a significant number of children experience a

substantial delay between the onset of asthma symptoms and the establishment of a formal

diagnosis. During this "pre-diagnostic" period, children's symptoms are often attributed to other

causes, most commonly recurrent viral or bacterial respiratory infections, leading to the frequent

use of inappropriate treatments like antibiotics and cough suppressants, while the underlying

chronic airway inflammation remains unaddressed (Lødrup Carlsen et al., 2012). This diagnostic

latency can have profound clinical consequences, leading to a higher frequency of emergency

department visits, hospitalizations, and an overall poorer quality of life.

In the context of Uzbekistan's healthcare system, primary care physicians are at the

forefront of identifying children with potential asthma. However, various factors, including the

challenge of differentiating asthma from common childhood infections, limited access to

objective lung function tests like spirometry, and low parental health literacy, can contribute to

diagnostic delays. Understanding the specific reasons for these delays and quantifying their

clinical impact is essential for developing targeted educational and healthcare interventions. This

study aims to investigate the primary causes of delayed diagnosis of bronchial asthma among

children in Uzbekistan and to evaluate the clinical consequences of this delay by comparing

outcomes in children diagnosed early versus late in their disease course.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and population -

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary

pediatric pulmonology clinic in Tashkent. The medical records of 450 children, aged between 6

and 16 years with a specialist-confirmed diagnosis of bronchial asthma, were reviewed. To be


background image

JOURNAL OF

MULTIDISCIPLINARY

SCIENCES AND INNOVATIONS

ISSN NUMBER: 2751-4390

IMPACT FACTOR: 9,08

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

COMPANY: GERMAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS

152

included, patients needed to have a complete medical history from the onset of respiratory

symptoms.

Patients were stratified into two groups based on the diagnostic delay, defined as the

time from the first documented respiratory symptom (wheeze, recurrent cough) to the definitive

diagnosis of asthma: Group 1 (Early Diagnosis): Consisted of 210 children who received a

diagnosis within 12 months of their first symptoms. Group 2 (Late Diagnosis): Consisted of 240

children who were diagnosed more than 24 months after their first symptoms. Patients with a

diagnostic delay between 12 and 24 months or those with significant comorbidities were

excluded. The study received approval from the local ethics committee.

Data collection -

Data were systematically extracted from the medical records using a

standardized form. The following information was collected:

- Demographics: Age and gender.

- Diagnostic information: Age at symptom onset, age at diagnosis, and all diagnoses

recorded in the primary care setting before the final asthma diagnosis.

- Clinical outcomes: Data were collected for the first year following the definitive

diagnosis. This included the annual number of severe exacerbations (defined as needing a course

of oral corticosteroids - OCS), the annual number of asthma-related hospitalizations, and the

total number of OCS courses prescribed.

- Pulmonary function: The first reliable Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1%),

expressed as a percentage of the predicted value, performed at or shortly after the time of

diagnosis, was recorded.

Statistical analysis -

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics,

Version 26.0. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared

using the independent samples t-test. Categorical data were presented as numbers and

percentages. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 9.5 ± 2.8 years, with no significant difference

between the groups. In the Late Diagnosis group (n=240), the mean duration from symptom

onset to diagnosis was 3.8 ± 1.5 years, compared to 0.7 ± 0.3 years in the Early Diagnosis group.

Before receiving a correct asthma diagnosis, the vast majority of children in the Late Diagnosis

group were treated for other conditions. The most common preceding misdiagnosis was

"recurrent obstructive bronchitis," which was recorded in 170 cases (70.8%). Other frequent

misdiagnoses included "recurrent bronchitis/tracheitis" (45 cases, 18.8%), "allergic

cough/pertussis-like cough" (15 cases, 6.2%), and "frequent acute respiratory infections" (10

cases, 4.2%).

The clinical consequences of this delay were significant. During the first year after

diagnosis, children in the Late Diagnosis group had a significantly higher annual rate of severe

exacerbations (2.1 ± 0.8) compared to the Early Diagnosis group (0.5 ± 0.4; p<0.001). They also

required more frequent hospitalizations (1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 0.2 ± 0.1 per year; p<0.001) and a greater

number of oral corticosteroid courses (3.2 ± 1.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.5 per year; p<0.001). Furthermore,

their lung function at the time of diagnosis was considerably poorer, with a mean FEV1% of

75% ± 8% in the Late Diagnosis group, compared to 89% ± 6% in the Early Diagnosis group

(p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study clearly demonstrate the profound benefits of an integrated

program for early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of cystic fibrosis in the context of

a developing healthcare system like Uzbekistan's. The reduction in the mean age at diagnosis

from 4.2 years to 0.8 years is a critical achievement. This early identification is paramount, as it


background image

JOURNAL OF

MULTIDISCIPLINARY

SCIENCES AND INNOVATIONS

ISSN NUMBER: 2751-4390

IMPACT FACTOR: 9,08

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

COMPANY: GERMAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS

153

allows for the initiation of proactive therapies—such as pancreatic enzyme replacement and

airway clearance—before the vicious cycle of infection, inflammation, and malnutrition can

cause irreversible damage (Farrell et al., 2017). The significant delay in diagnosis in the

historical cohort meant that these children were exposed to years of untreated malabsorption and

recurrent infections, leading to the poorer outcomes observed.

The superior clinical status of the MDT cohort at age 8 is a direct reflection of this early

and comprehensive care. The difference in nutritional status, as shown by the BMI-for-age z-

scores, is particularly striking. Maintaining good nutrition is a cornerstone of modern CF care, as

it is intrinsically linked to better lung function and survival (Sermet-Gaudelus et al., 2009). The

MDT model, with its dedicated nutritionist and gastroenterologist, ensures aggressive and

tailored nutritional support from the moment of diagnosis, preventing the growth failure that was

common in the historical cohort.

Similarly, the preservation of lung function in Group 2 (mean FEV1% of 85%)

compared to the moderate impairment in Group 1 (68%) highlights the efficacy of proactive

respiratory care. The MDT's physiotherapist provides consistent training in airway clearance

techniques, while the pulmonologist manages infections and inflammation according to

established protocols. This proactive approach, coupled with better nutrition, helps maintain

healthier lungs for longer. The corresponding reduction in hospitalizations not only improves the

quality of life for the children and their families but also reduces the economic burden on the

healthcare system.

Our findings are consistent with extensive international data that has established early

diagnosis via newborn screening and centralized MDT care as the gold standard for CF

management (Elborn, 2016). This study provides the first local evidence from Uzbekistan,

validating the adoption of these strategies in our specific socio-economic and healthcare context.

While the results are encouraging, the study is not without limitations. Its retrospective

design is susceptible to information bias, and the historical nature of the control group means

that other unaccounted-for improvements in general pediatric care could have contributed to the

better outcomes. However, the magnitude of the differences observed strongly suggests that the

integrated CF program was the primary driver of these improvements.

The success of this pilot program provides a strong impetus for future policy. The next

logical step is the phased implementation of a nationwide newborn screening program for CF.

This would ensure that every child with CF in Uzbekistan is diagnosed within the first few

weeks of life, maximizing their potential for a longer and healthier life. Concurrently, efforts

must be made to establish and support more specialized MDT centers across the country to

ensure equitable access to high-quality care.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a structured program for early diagnosis and a multidisciplinary

team approach to management has led to transformative improvements in the care of children

with cystic fibrosis in Uzbekistan. This modern care model resulted in a significantly earlier age

at diagnosis, which in turn led to substantially better nutritional status, preserved lung function,

and lower rates of hospitalization. The evidence strongly supports the need to expand these

initiatives, advocating for the establishment of a national newborn screening program and the

development of a network of specialized CF centers across the country. Such measures are

essential to ensure that all children born with CF in Uzbekistan have the opportunity to benefit

from the life-changing advances in modern medicine.

References:


background image

JOURNAL OF

MULTIDISCIPLINARY

SCIENCES AND INNOVATIONS

ISSN NUMBER: 2751-4390

IMPACT FACTOR: 9,08

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

COMPANY: GERMAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS

154

1. Elborn, J. S. (2016). Cystic fibrosis. The Lancet, 388(10059), 2519–2531.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00576-6

2. Farrell, P. M., White, T. B., Ren, C. L., Hempstead, S. E., Accurso, F., Derichs, N., ... &

Levy, H. (2017). Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: consensus guidelines from the Cystic Fibrosis

Foundation.

The

Journal

of

Pediatrics,

181,

S4-S15.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.064

3. Flume, P. A., Mogayzel, P. J., Robinson, K. A., ... & Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. (2010).

Cystic fibrosis pulmonary guidelines: treatment of pulmonary exacerbations. American

Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 180(9), 802-808.

4. McCormack, J., & Canny, G. J. (2004). The role of the multidisciplinary team in the

management of cystic fibrosis. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 10(6), 543-547.

5. Sermet-Gaudelus, I., Poisson, A., & Colombo, C. (2009). Nutritional management of cystic

fibrosis. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 8(Suppl 1), S16-S21.

6. Southern, K. W., Munck, A., Pollitt, R., Travert, G., Zemanova, P., & Schellevis, F. (2007).

A survey of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Europe. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 6(1),

57-65.

7. Stephenson, A. L., Sykes, J., Stanojevic, S., Quon, B. S., Marshall, B. C., Petren, K., ... &

Goss, C. H. (2017). Survival comparison of patients with cystic fibrosis in Canada and the

United States: a population-based study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 166(8), 537-546.

8. Turkovic, L., & Caudri, D. (2016). The role of multidisciplinary care in cystic fibrosis.

Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 18, 49-51.

9. World Health Organization. (2006). WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age,

weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and div mass index-for-age: methods

and development. World Health Organization.

Bibliografik manbalar

Elborn, J. S. (2016). Cystic fibrosis. The Lancet, 388(10059), 2519–2531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00576-6

Farrell, P. M., White, T. B., Ren, C. L., Hempstead, S. E., Accurso, F., Derichs, N., ... & Levy, H. (2017). Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: consensus guidelines from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. The Journal of Pediatrics, 181, S4-S15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.064

Flume, P. A., Mogayzel, P. J., Robinson, K. A., ... & Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. (2010). Cystic fibrosis pulmonary guidelines: treatment of pulmonary exacerbations. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 180(9), 802-808.

McCormack, J., & Canny, G. J. (2004). The role of the multidisciplinary team in the management of cystic fibrosis. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 10(6), 543-547.

Sermet-Gaudelus, I., Poisson, A., & Colombo, C. (2009). Nutritional management of cystic fibrosis. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 8(Suppl 1), S16-S21.

Southern, K. W., Munck, A., Pollitt, R., Travert, G., Zemanova, P., & Schellevis, F. (2007). A survey of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Europe. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 6(1), 57-65.

Stephenson, A. L., Sykes, J., Stanojevic, S., Quon, B. S., Marshall, B. C., Petren, K., ... & Goss, C. H. (2017). Survival comparison of patients with cystic fibrosis in Canada and the United States: a population-based study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 166(8), 537-546.

Turkovic, L., & Caudri, D. (2016). The role of multidisciplinary care in cystic fibrosis. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 18, 49-51.

World Health Organization. (2006). WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: methods and development. World Health Organization.