A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ASSOCIATIVE EXPERIENCE AND THEMATIC GROUPING PRINCIPLES IN LEARNER’S EXPLANATORY DICTIONARIES (IN THE CASE OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES)

Annotasiya

This article presents a comparative analysis of the principles of associative experience and thematic grouping—two key approaches in the structure of modern learner’s explanatory dictionaries—using examples from English and Uzbek. The study examines the role of these principles from linguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives, focusing on how they address the cognitive needs of language learners, reflect the mental organization of lexical items, and contribute to the effectiveness of vocabulary acquisition. The research analyzes the structure and methodological approaches of major learner’s dictionaries such as the Oxford Wordpower Dictionary (English) and the Izohli Lug‘at (Uzbek), evaluating their user-friendliness, ability to form semantic fields, and functionality in language instruction. Furthermore, the article explores how lexical items in these dictionaries are presented in terms of semantic, associative, and thematic relationships, and assesses the impact of these approaches on the development of learners’ vocabulary.

Manba turi: Jurnallar
Yildan beri qamrab olingan yillar 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
 
Chiqarish:
Bilim sohasi
  • Independent Researcher, PhD Candidate, Karshi State University
f
183-189

Кўчирилди

Кўчирилганлиги хақида маълумот йук.
Ulashish
Tosheva , D. . (2025). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ASSOCIATIVE EXPERIENCE AND THEMATIC GROUPING PRINCIPLES IN LEARNER’S EXPLANATORY DICTIONARIES (IN THE CASE OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 1(6), 183–189. Retrieved from https://www.inlibrary.uz/index.php/jmsi/article/view/133660
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Annotasiya

This article presents a comparative analysis of the principles of associative experience and thematic grouping—two key approaches in the structure of modern learner’s explanatory dictionaries—using examples from English and Uzbek. The study examines the role of these principles from linguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives, focusing on how they address the cognitive needs of language learners, reflect the mental organization of lexical items, and contribute to the effectiveness of vocabulary acquisition. The research analyzes the structure and methodological approaches of major learner’s dictionaries such as the Oxford Wordpower Dictionary (English) and the Izohli Lug‘at (Uzbek), evaluating their user-friendliness, ability to form semantic fields, and functionality in language instruction. Furthermore, the article explores how lexical items in these dictionaries are presented in terms of semantic, associative, and thematic relationships, and assesses the impact of these approaches on the development of learners’ vocabulary.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 7, 2025

183

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ASSOCIATIVE EXPERIENCE AND THEMATIC

GROUPING PRINCIPLES IN LEARNER’S EXPLANATORY DICTIONARIES (IN THE

CASE OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES)

Tosheva Dilbar Muzaffar kizi

Independent Researcher, PhD Candidate, Karshi State University

Annotation:

This article presents a comparative analysis of the principles of associative

experience and thematic grouping—two key approaches in the structure of modern learner’s

explanatory dictionaries—using examples from English and Uzbek. The study examines the role

of these principles from linguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives, focusing on how they

address the cognitive needs of language learners, reflect the mental organization of lexical items,

and contribute to the effectiveness of vocabulary acquisition. The research analyzes the structure

and methodological approaches of major learner’s dictionaries such as the Oxford Wordpower

Dictionary (English) and the Izohli Lug‘at (Uzbek), evaluating their user-friendliness, ability to

form semantic fields, and functionality in language instruction. Furthermore, the article explores

how lexical items in these dictionaries are presented in terms of semantic, associative, and

thematic relationships, and assesses the impact of these approaches on the development of

learners’ vocabulary.

Keywords:

learner’s explanatory dictionary, associative experience, thematic grouping,

lexicography, psycholinguistics, semantic analysis, cognitive approach, language teaching

methodology

Annotatsiya:

Ushbu maqolada zamonaviy o‘quv izohli lug‘atlarning tuzilishiga oid asosiy

tamoyillardan bo‘lgan assotsiativ tajriba va tematik guruhlash yondashuvlari ingliz va o‘zbek

tillari misolida qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotda til o‘rganuvchilarning kognitiv ehtiyojlarini

qondirish, leksik birliklarning mental organizatsiyasini inobatga olish, hamda leksik o‘zlashtirish

jarayonining samaradorligini ta’minlashda mazkur tamoyillarning tutgan o‘rni lingvistik va

psixolingvistik asosda ko‘rib chiqiladi. Maqola doirasida ingliz tilidagi Oxford Wordpower

Dictionary hamda o‘zbek tilidagi Izohli lug‘at kabi asosiy o‘quv lug‘atlari struktura va

yondashuv nuqtai nazaridan tahlil qilinib, ularning foydalanuvchi uchun qulaylik darajasi,

semantik maydonlarni shakllantirish imkoniyati va til o‘rgatishdagi funksionalligi baholanadi.

Shuningdek, lug‘atlardagi leksik birliklarning o‘zaro semantik, assotsiativ va tematik

bog‘liqliklari qanday shaklda ifoda etilgani, bu yondashuvlarning til o‘rganuvchilarning so‘z

boyligini rivojlantirishga qanday ta’sir ko‘rsatayotgani tahlil etiladi.

Kalit so‘zlar:

o‘quv izohli lug‘at, assotsiativ tajriba, tematik guruhlash, leksikografiya,

psixolingvistika, semantik tahlil, kognitiv yondashuv, til o‘qitish metodikasi

Аннотация:

В данной статье проводится сравнительный анализ подходов ассоциативного

опыта и тематической группировки — одних из основных принципов построения

современных учебных толковых словарей — на примере английского и узбекского языков.

В исследовании рассматривается роль этих принципов с лингвистической и

психолингвистической точек зрения, в частности, их значимость в удовлетворении

когнитивных потребностей изучающих язык, учёте ментальной организации лексических

единиц и повышении эффективности процесса усвоения лексики. В рамках статьи


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 7, 2025

184

анализируются структура и методологические подходы таких ключевых учебных

словарей, как Oxford Wordpower Dictionary (английский язык) и Izohli Lug‘at (узбекский

язык), с точки зрения удобства использования, возможностей формирования

семантических полей и функциональности в обучении языку. Также рассматривается,

каким образом в этих словарях представлены семантические, ассоциативные и

тематические связи между лексическими единицами, и как данные подходы влияют на

расширение словарного запаса изучающих язык.

Ключевые слова:

учебный толковый словарь, ассоциативный опыт, тематическая

группировка, лексикография, психолингвистика, семантический анализ, когнитивный

подход, методика преподавания языка

INTRODUCTION

In modern linguistics, lexicography plays a crucial role in forming the theoretical and practical

foundations for language teaching. In particular, learner’s explanatory dictionaries are widely

used as tools for acquiring vocabulary, understanding word meanings, recognizing their usage

contexts, and applying them in communicative situations. The effectiveness of such dictionaries

largely depends on the principles used in organizing lexical units—especially methodological

approaches such as thematic grouping and associative links.
The thematic grouping principle aims to create systematic knowledge in the learner by clustering

words from closely related semantic fields, while the associative experience approach ensures

psychological, contextual, and semantic connections among words. The implementation of these

two principles in dictionary structure directly influences how the learner receives, processes, and

memorizes the information. Today, in English lexicography, both associative and thematic

grouping approaches are used in tandem to create lexical systems that stimulate learners'

cognitive abilities.

The relevance of this research

lies in the increasing need to present lexical databases in a

scientifically grounded, interactive, and user-friendly format in order to develop competitive

language proficiency in the global information space. Enriching lexicography with modern

methodological approaches is of significant importance for enhancing the effectiveness of

language teaching.

The purpose of the research

is to conduct a comparative analysis of the principles of

associative experience and thematic grouping employed in English and Uzbek learner’s

explanatory dictionaries, and to determine their effectiveness.
T

he subject of the research

is the associative and thematic approaches applied in organizing

lexical units within learner’s explanatory dictionaries. The object of the research includes

English and Uzbek learner’s dictionaries, particularly the Oxford Wordpower Dictionary and

Explanatory Dictionary of the Uzbek Language, and the lexical-structural systems within them.

Research Objectives

The following tasks have been defined to achieve the aims of this study:
1. To explore the theoretical foundations of learner’s explanatory dictionaries.
2. To analyze the scientific basis of thematic grouping and associative experience principles.
3. To conduct a comparative study of the structures of English and Uzbek learner’s dictionaries.
4. To identify the advantages of the approaches applied in both languages’ dictionaries.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 7, 2025

185

Scientific Novelty

The comparative analysis of associative and thematic grouping principles within English and

Uzbek learner’s explanatory dictionaries was carried out on the basis of linguistic and

psycholinguistic frameworks. In general, learner’s dictionaries are one of the key tools for

language learners. Their effectiveness largely depends on how lexical units are organized. The

main principles used in dictionary compilation—namely thematic grouping and associative

experience—both play an essential role in shaping the structure of learner’s dictionaries.

LITERATURE REVIEW

In studying the theoretical and practical foundations of learner’s explanatory dictionaries, various

sources within the fields of linguistics, lexicography, psycholinguistics, and language teaching

methodology play a crucial role. This section analyzes key scholarly works relevant to the topic

and highlights their contributions to the research.
Cowie, A. P. (1999). English Dictionaries for Foreign Learners: A History. Oxford University

Press – This work provides a comprehensive analysis of the historical development of English

learner’s dictionaries, the evolution of lexicographic principles, and their user-oriented nature.

Cowie explores the formation of associative networks, collocations, and synonymic relations in

language learning, especially using practical examples such as the Oxford Wordpower

Dictionary to illustrate how cognitive connections between words are applied in dictionary

structures.
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Longman – This guide focuses on vocabulary

teaching methods from a psycholinguistic perspective. Thornbury emphasizes the effectiveness

of thematic grouping in language acquisition and justifies the principle of teaching lexical items

through logical blocks. The book serves as a methodological foundation for the study. Gairns, R.

& Redman, S. (1986). Working with Words: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Vocabulary.

Cambridge University Press – The authors analyze the benefits of teaching vocabulary through

thematic fields with practical examples. They stress the importance of interrelated lexical units in

dictionaries, demonstrating how this activates learners' memory mechanisms. This work deepens

the understanding of the pedagogical foundations of thematic approaches. Nation, I. S. P. (2001).

Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press – This book analyzes

how associative and thematic connections are formed through psychological processes in

acquiring vocabulary in a foreign language. According to Nation, words are stored in a network

form within the learner’s mental map, and thus, dictionary structures should align with this

principle. The present study uses this viewpoint to comparatively analyze the structures of

English and Uzbek dictionaries. Hasanov, B. (2018). Leksikografiyaga kirish [Introduction to

Lexicography]. Tashkent: Fan Publishing House – This work outlines the theoretical foundations

of Uzbek lexicography. The author pays special attention to the structure of explanatory

dictionaries, the organization of lexical units, and the methodology of clarifying them. Qodirova,

M. (2022). “O‘zbek tilida tematik lug‘atlar yaratish tamoyillari” [Principles of Creating

Thematic Dictionaries in Uzbek]. Issues of Philology, No. 1 – This article highlights the

importance of creating dictionaries based on thematic approaches in the Uzbek language. It

serves as a directly relevant source for the present study. O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati (1–3

volumes). (2006). Tashkent: Uzbekistan National Encyclopedia – This is the primary source that

provides comprehensive explanations of basic lexical units in the contemporary Uzbek language.

The entries are organized alphabetically. Oxford Wordpower Dictionary (2012). Oxford

University Press – Designed for English language learners, this dictionary presents words with

definitions, pronunciation, grammar, synonyms, collocations, and associations in a user-friendly

format. It stands out for being based on a psycholinguistic approach and was used as a model in


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 7, 2025

186

the study.
The literature review demonstrates that in English lexicography, psycholinguistic and cognitive

principles are widely applied in the compilation of learner’s dictionaries. Dictionaries

constructed based on associative networks and thematic blocks facilitate easier language

acquisition for learners.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This research employed a comprehensive methodological approach to identify the application of

associative experience and thematic grouping principles in learner’s explanatory dictionaries,

and to conduct a comparative analysis based on English and Uzbek lexicographic practices. The

study focuses on analyzing the structure of learner’s dictionaries in both languages, their user-

oriented design, the principles of lexical organization, and their psycholinguistic effectiveness.
1. Scientific Approaches
The following core approaches were jointly utilized in the study:
Descriptive approach — The structure, composition, and organizational principles of the existing

learner’s dictionaries were thoroughly analyzed.
Comparative approach — English and Uzbek learner’s explanatory dictionaries were compared

to determine the extent to which thematic and associative principles are applied in each.
Psycholinguistic approach — The interconnection between lexical items, semantic associations,

and their role in language acquisition were evaluated.
Cognitive approach — The mental processes involved in learners’ language perception,

information processing, and memorization were examined in relation to dictionary structure.
2. Research Materials and Sources
The following learner’s dictionaries were selected as primary empirical sources for the analysis:
Oxford Wordpower Dictionary (2012) — An English learner’s dictionary that extensively

employs associative and thematic approaches.
Explanatory Dictionary of the Uzbek Language (2006, Volumes 1–3) — A dictionary compiled

in a traditional lexicographic style, providing alphabetically ordered definitions of contemporary

Uzbek words.
Additionally, the Uzbek-English Learner’s Dictionary (compiled by T. Norboyeva et al.) was

reviewed as a supplementary analytical resource.
3. Analytical Tools
The following analytical tools were applied during the study:
Content analysis — Lexical entries were examined to determine how words were grouped and

whether semantic or associative connections were presented, with results statistically

summarized.
Structural analysis — The organizational elements of dictionary entries (e.g., headword,

definition, collocations, synonyms, antonyms, context) were analyzed in terms of their

interrelations.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 7, 2025

187

User-oriented criteria — Features intended to support user comprehension (e.g., visual layout,

thematic categorization, ease of use) were evaluated.
4. Research Stages
The research was conducted in the following sequential stages:
1. Theoretical foundation — The role of associative and thematic approaches in linguistics was

examined, along with their scientific basis and best practices from foreign experience.
2. Empirical analysis — The application of each principle in the selected dictionaries was

assessed through concrete examples.
3. Comparative analysis — A side-by-side comparison of the English and Uzbek dictionaries

was performed.
4. Methodological delimitation — The research was limited to learner’s explanatory dictionaries,

excluding general encyclopedic and terminological dictionaries. Only English and Uzbek

dictionaries were considered; dictionaries of other languages fell outside the study scope. This

research methodology was based on a systematic and multi-faceted approach to identify how

associative and thematic principles are implemented in learner’s dictionaries.

RESEARCH RESULTS

The study carried out a detailed comparative linguistic and psycholinguistic analysis of learner’s

explanatory dictionaries compiled in English and Uzbek. The results revealed notable differences

in word organization principles, presentation formats, thematic grouping, and the degree of

associative connectivity. The findings are summarized below according to key directions of

analysis.
1. Differences in Lexical Organization Principles
The analysis showed that English learner’s dictionaries such as the Oxford Wordpower

Dictionary are structured with a strong user-oriented design. Words are often presented within

thematic blocks, accompanied by contextual examples, collocations, and associative links.

Entries are supported not only with definitions but also with additional elements that highlight

inter-word relationships: synonyms, antonyms, idiomatic expressions, frequently used word

combinations, and simplified definitions are used to contextualize lexical units.
In contrast, the Explanatory Dictionary of the Uzbek Language (2006) follows a strictly

alphabetical structure. Definitions are provided in a scholarly, encyclopedic style that serves as a

convenient source for gathering information, rather than emphasizing learning facilitation.
2. Effectiveness of the Thematic Grouping Approach
English learner’s dictionaries frequently organize words by semantic fields (e.g., Food, Health,

Education, Nature, Emotions), which enhances learners’ ability to systematize, memorize, and

actively use vocabulary, particularly at beginner and intermediate levels. Thematic categorization

supports cognitive retention and facilitates conceptual clarity.
3. Presence and Functionality of Associative Networks
The associative approach in English dictionaries, especially the Oxford Wordpower Dictionary,

is well-aligned with cognitive models of language learning. Each new word is often presented

alongside others that share logical, contextual, or psychological connections. For example, the


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 7, 2025

188

entry for “rain” may be linked to words like “umbrella,” “storm,” or “cloud,” thereby helping

learners form semantic networks in their minds.
In Uzbek dictionaries, associative links are occasionally present—primarily in the form of

synonyms or antonyms—but the depth and systematization of these connections are limited

compared to English learner’s dictionaries.
4. General Conclusions Based on Descriptive Analysis
English learner’s dictionaries are built on pedagogical and psycholinguistic foundations,

simplifying the language acquisition process for users. Uzbek dictionaries, on the other hand, are

structured in a more scientific-encyclopedic manner, primarily serving as a source of linguistic

information.
The findings indicate that integrating both thematic and associative approaches can significantly

enhance learner’s dictionaries. Such integration would bring these resources closer to the user

and expand their cognitive reach through semantic and associative structuring. Learner’s

explanatory dictionaries that are harmonized with modern language teaching methodologies can

considerably facilitate the language learning process, both psychologically and semantically.

DISCUSSION

The analysis reveals that English learner’s dictionaries predominantly adopt a cognitive approach,

wherein words are presented in interconnected ways. This organization facilitates memorization

and supports the expansion of active vocabulary. In contrast, Uzbek dictionaries primarily adhere

to a classical lexicographic model, relying more on a scientific-descriptive approach. This study

comparatively examined the application of associative experience and thematic grouping

principles in learner’s dictionaries, as well as their impact on users and their role in the practices

of English and Uzbek linguistics. The findings enabled the formulation of important scholarly

insights regarding the effectiveness, methodological strengths, and lexicographic advantages of

these two approaches. Dictionaries developed based on thematic grouping—especially in

English—enable learners to systematize their knowledge and memorize new words more

effectively by organizing them into logical blocks. Grouping vocabulary items by semantic fields

helps clarify interrelations between words, thereby enhancing the learner’s communicative

competence. For instance, in the Oxford Wordpower Dictionary, under the theme "Food", words

like bake, boil, fry, roast are grouped together, activating the learner’s semantic skills through

contextual association. In Uzbek dictionaries, each word is presented as an independent lexical

unit with a consistent but individualized explanation, without thematic categorization.
The associative approach is grounded in the use of psycholinguistic connections that naturally

form between words in the human mind. This method enables learners to relate new lexical items

to their existing knowledge and experiences. The research shows that English learner’s

dictionaries make effective use of this principle. Words are presented along with synonyms,

antonyms, collocations, and example phrases in real contexts, which enhances activation and

recall. This approach aligns with cognitive models of language learning, as human memory often

functions more efficiently through associations than through linear logic.
Modern English learner’s dictionaries are designed with user-friendliness in mind and aim to

support active language acquisition. This is achieved by integrating not only linguistic theory but

also cognitive psychology, educational technology, and information design. Words are enriched

with contextual examples, pictograms, grammatical indicators, and other visual aids, providing

learners with greater opportunities for independent study.
The discussion confirms that both associative experience and thematic grouping are essential


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 7, 2025

189

methodological foundations for the effective organization of modern learner’s dictionaries. Their

implementation plays a critical role in expanding vocabulary, forming semantic connections,

ensuring long-term retention, and developing active language competence.

CONCLUSION

This study conducted a comparative analysis of the use of associative experience and thematic

grouping principles in the structure of learner’s explanatory dictionaries and assessed their

impact and effectiveness in the context of English and Uzbek linguistics. The findings highlight

the significant role these two approaches play in modern lexicography and provide insights into

how their integration can open up new scientific and practical directions in dictionary

compilation.
Based on the comparative analysis, it can be concluded that the combined application of

associative and thematic principles in learner’s dictionaries significantly enhances their

effectiveness as language teaching tools. Such integration facilitates vocabulary acquisition,

improves semantic processing, and promotes more meaningful and lasting language learning

outcomes.

REFERENCES

1. Cowie, A. P. (1999). English Dictionaries for Foreign Learners: A History. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

2. Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. London: Longman.
3. Norqulova, D. (2020). Problems in Teaching the Core Vocabulary of the Uzbek Language.

Tashkent: Tashkent State Pedagogical University.

4. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

5. Oxford Wordpower Dictionary (2012). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Explanatory Dictionary of the Uzbek Language (Vols. 1–3) (2006). Tashkent: National

Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan.

7. Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (1986). Working with Words: A Guide to Teaching and Learning

Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

8. Hasanov, B. (2018). Introduction to Lexicography. Tashkent: Fan Publishing House.
9. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and

Applied Linguistics (4th ed.). London: Longman.

10. Qodirova, M. (2022). Principles of Creating Thematic Dictionaries in the Uzbek Language.

Issues of Philology, (1), 45–50.

Bibliografik manbalar

Cowie, A. P. (1999). English Dictionaries for Foreign Learners: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. London: Longman.

Norqulova, D. (2020). Problems in Teaching the Core Vocabulary of the Uzbek Language. Tashkent: Tashkent State Pedagogical University.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford Wordpower Dictionary (2012). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Explanatory Dictionary of the Uzbek Language (Vols. 1–3) (2006). Tashkent: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan.

Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (1986). Working with Words: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hasanov, B. (2018). Introduction to Lexicography. Tashkent: Fan Publishing House.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th ed.). London: Longman.

Qodirova, M. (2022). Principles of Creating Thematic Dictionaries in the Uzbek Language. Issues of Philology, (1), 45–50.