Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025
Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:
6.995, 2024 7.75
http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass
139
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEATURES IN GLOBAL MESSAGING PLATFORMS:
LESSONS FOR UZBEK DEVELOPMENT
Odiljon Atabaev Xusniddin ugli
Department of Information Technologies
Andijan State Technical Institute
+998916114818
Abstract:
In recent years, global messaging applications such as Telegram, WhatsApp, WeChat,
and Snapchat have become central to digital communication, each offering unique features
tailored to user behavior, privacy expectations, and cultural preferences. Despite their popularity,
these platforms are not fully optimized for the linguistic, social, and regulatory context of
Uzbekistan. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the technical and functional aspects of
leading messaging apps, with the aim of identifying best practices and feature gaps relevant to
the potential development of a localized Uzbek messaging platform. Through systematic
evaluation of UI/UX design, privacy mechanisms, content moderation, feature sets, and
integration capabilities, we highlight the strengths and limitations of each platform. The analysis
also considers sociocultural and infrastructural factors specific to Uzbekistan. The findings offer
valuable insights for developers, policy-makers, and digital entrepreneurs interested in creating
scalable, secure, and culturally adaptive communication tools for the Uzbek-speaking digital
audience.
Keywords:
Messaging platforms, Feature analysis, Social networking, UI/UX, Privacy, Content
moderation
Introduction.
Messaging platforms have become the backbone of modern communication,
evolving far beyond simple text exchange to support multimedia sharing, encrypted
conversations, commerce, education, and even governance. As of 2025, WhatsApp leads the
global messaging app market with over 2.8 billion monthly active users, followed by WeChat
(1.3 billion), Telegram (900 million), and Snapchat (750 million) [1-2]. These applications differ
not only in their technical capabilities but also in their adaptation to specific cultural and
regulatory environments.
In Uzbekistan, while foreign messaging apps dominate user engagement, they often fail to
accommodate linguistic nuances, regulatory alignment, and local communication norms. For
instance, the dual-script (Latin/Cyrillic) nature of the Uzbek language is poorly supported in
most global platforms, and data localization remains a grey area in user privacy compliance.
Moreover, none of the leading platforms provide native features tailored to regional user
behavior, such as family group dynamics, religious observance schedules, or low-bandwidth
video optimization for rural users [3].
This paper aims to analyze the functional strengths and weaknesses of four major messaging
platforms - Telegram, WhatsApp, WeChat, and Snapchat—by comparing their core features,
technical infrastructure, security protocols, and extensibility. The goal is not merely comparative
but constructive: to extract actionable insights for the potential development of an Uzbek-
focused social messaging app. Rather than replicating Western or Asian models, this study
advocates for culturally sensitive, user-informed, and infrastructure-aware digital design [4].
Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025
Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:
6.995, 2024 7.75
http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass
140
By combining quantitative data on global usage trends and qualitative evaluation of platform
features, this paper serves as a foundational study for developers, researchers, and decision-
makers aiming to localize digital communication tools in Uzbekistan and the broader Central
Asian region.
Methods.
This study adopts a comparative feature analysis framework to evaluate four globally
dominant messaging platforms - WhatsApp, Telegram, WeChat, and Snapchat - with the
objective of identifying technical, cultural, and usability patterns relevant to the design of a
localized Uzbek messaging platform.
The chosen apps were selected based on the following criteria [5-7]:
o
High global user base (each with 700+ million monthly active users).
o
Distinct technical architectures and messaging philosophies (e.g., open-source vs.
proprietary, centralized vs. decentralized).
o
Diverse cultural adaptation models, especially in Asia and multilingual contexts.
o
Frequent usage among Uzbek users, based on surveys and local app store trends.
To evaluate these platforms, we developed a multi-dimensional matrix consisting of the
following categories:
Table 1. Evaluation criterion
Category
Sub-features Evaluated
User Experience (UX)
Interface simplicity, accessibility, dual-script support
Security
End-to-end encryption, metadata collection, open-source code
Cultural Localization
Language support, holiday/calendar features, sticker
relevance
Feature Set
Text/audio/video chat, file sharing, group capabilities
Platform Extensibility
API availability, bot support, third-party integrations
Offline Usability
Low-bandwidth performance, message queueing
Regulatory Compliance
Data localization, censorship tools, GDPR or local
equivalents
Each feature was qualitatively rated on a three-point scale:
Fully implemented and effective
Partially implemented or limited
Lacking or absent
This study does not include:
Server-side implementation analysis due to proprietary restrictions
In-depth monetization or advertisement strategies
Legacy apps (e.g., Viber, Line) with declining relevance
The methodology prioritizes practical applicability for product design and user-focused analysis
over low-level technical deep-dives.
Results.
Now we move on to structured comparison of WhatsApp, Telegram, WeChat, and
Snapchat across core features critical for the design of a culturally-adapted Uzbek messaging app.
The goal is to identify key differentiators and gaps that can inform localized innovation. (see
Table 2.)
Table 2. Feature Comparison Table of Social Platforms
Category
Telegram
Snapchat
Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025
Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:
6.995, 2024 7.75
http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass
141
1.
Interface
Simplicity
Clean UI, no
ads
Minimalist
design
Feature-heavy
UI
Cluttered
for
new users
2.
Uzbek
Language
Support
Latin
script
only
Latin only (no
Cyrillic)
Not available
Not available
3.
Dual-Script
Input
Limited
Possible but not
optimized
No support
No support
4.
End-to-End
Encryption
Default for all
chats
Only in Secret
Chats
Government
access
Applied for all
content
5. Open Source
Code
Closed
Partially open
Closed
Closed
6. Bots and APIs Not available
Extensive
bot
API
Mini Programs
only
No API
7.
Group
Features
Up to 1024
members
Supergroups
(200,000+)
Limited to use
case
Focused
on
private sharing
8. File Sharing
Limits
2 GB max
2+ GB and
cloud storage
Compressed or
blocked
Limited sharing
9.
Low
Bandwidth
Support
Yes
Yes
Urban
optimized
High data use
10.
Visual
Messaging
(Stories)
Status
Stories
in
Channels
Not
popular
globally
Core feature
11.
Data
Localization
Servers abroad
Abroad (Dubai,
etc.)
China-based
US-based
From above comparison we can conclude following data:
o
Telegram emerges as the most extensible and developer-friendly platform, offering bot
APIs, large group support, and cloud storage. However, its Cyrillic support and localization for
Uzbek culture are weak.
o
WhatsApp is widely used in Uzbekistan and easy to navigate, but it’s closed-source, has
no bot support, and lacks any local features.
o
WeChat, while feature-rich in China, does not scale globally due to language and cultural
limitations. It is a powerful blueprint for ecosystem integration (payments, services).
o
Snapchat focuses on visual interaction, but offers little beyond entertainment and is not
well-suited for practical everyday communication in Uzbekistan.
The analysis reveals that an effective Uzbek messaging app should prioritize support for the
Uzbek script, as native-language accessibility remains fundamental for broad user engagement.
Ensuring end-to-end encryption is equally critical, given growing global and regional concerns
about data privacy and secure communication. Incorporating local calendar tools tailored to
regional holidays and cultural norms would enhance relevance and daily utility. Offline
compatibility, particularly for users in areas with unstable internet access, is another vital feature.
Additionally, robust group and bot tools can enable more dynamic interactions and automate
Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025
Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:
6.995, 2024 7.75
http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass
142
tasks, especially for business and community use. The app should also guarantee that user data is
stored and processed locally to build trust and comply with emerging data sovereignty
regulations. Finally, optimization for low-end devices is necessary to ensure inclusivity, as a
significant portion of the target audience may rely on older or budget smartphones.
Discussion.
The development of a localized Uzbek messaging app must be guided not only by
global social networking trends but also by the specific sociocultural, technical, and economic
realities of Uzbekistan. Our feature priority analysis reveals a strong demand for platform
functionalities that bridge linguistic accessibility, data security, and practical usability in
resource-constrained environments.
Firstly, the necessity of Uzbek script support (both Cyrillic and Latin) reflects deeper cultural
and identity factors. Most global platforms like WhatsApp and Snapchat support Unicode, yet do
not optimize the user interface or autocorrect models for Uzbek. This creates a usability gap that
a local app could close, fostering inclusivity and digital engagement across all demographics.
Second, data privacy and encryption are no longer optional but expected. Telegram, which has a
strong user base in Uzbekistan, is often preferred due to its perceived security and lightweight
design. However, its default chats are not end-to-end encrypted, and user data is not hosted
locally. Our proposed app must differentiate by offering both robust encryption and data
localization, giving users confidence that their information is protected and governed under
national laws.
Another strong implication is the integration of offline compatibility. In many regions of
Uzbekistan, especially rural areas, internet connectivity remains unreliable. Designing the app to
cache messages, media, and even calendar events for later sync would significantly improve the
user experience and adoption.
In comparison with leading apps like WhatsApp, WeChat, or Snapchat, these platforms have
developed large ecosystems but often lack regional tailoring. For instance, WeChat thrives in
China because of its deep integration with local payment, ID, and public services — a model
which suggests the power of ecosystem thinking. While Uzbekistan lacks similar digital
infrastructure, adding tools like Uzbek calendar support, local weather updates, or Uzbek-
language bots could be early steps toward a contextual ecosystem.
Finally, device compatibility and performance optimization is non-negotiable. A significant
share of Uzbek users rely on low- or mid-tier Android devices with limited memory and
bandwidth. The app’s architecture must therefore prioritize minimal background activity,
efficient storage use, and adaptive loading for media.
In summary, while global platforms dominate the messaging landscape, they often overlook
local nuances. By targeting these overlooked areas - script support, data sovereignty, offline
access, and cultural integration - an Uzbek social messaging app has the potential to carve out a
meaningful and sustainable user base. However, the successful realization of such a platform
requires not only technical capacity but also ongoing engagement with local communities,
policymakers, and developers.
Conclusion.
This paper has explored the historical development, current dynamics, and critical
design implications of social networking and messaging platforms, with the aim of informing the
creation of a localized Uzbek messaging app. The analysis underscores that while global
platforms like Telegram, WhatsApp, WeChat, and Snapchat dominate user markets, they often
fail to address specific linguistic, cultural, and infrastructural needs of countries like Uzbekistan.
Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025
Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:
6.995, 2024 7.75
http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass
143
Our findings highlight several key priorities for a homegrown solution: full support for the
Uzbek script, robust end-to-end encryption, offline-friendly architecture, tools tailored to local
traditions (such as Uzbek calendar integration), and optimization for low-end mobile devices.
These design features are not simply enhancements - they are essential for ensuring inclusivity,
data sovereignty, and real user utility.
References.
1.
Statista. “Most popular global mobile messenger apps as of July 2025, by monthly active
users.”
https://www.statista.com/statistics/258749/most-popular-global-mobile-messenger-apps/
2.
Business of Apps. “Telegram Revenue and Usage Statistics (2025).”
https://www.businessofapps.com/data/telegram-statistics/
3.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and
scholarship.
Journal
of
Computer-Mediated
Communication,
13(1),
210–230.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
4.
https://www.whatsapp.com/
5.
https://telegram.org/
6.
https://www.wechat.com/
7.
https://www.snapchat.com/
