IMPROVING THE DIAGNOSTICS OF UTERUS SCAR AFTER CESAREAN SECTION

Abstract

Around the world, the number of caesarean sections is increasing every year. The purpose of the study was to study the consistency of the uterine scar after cesarean section in pregnant women of reproductive age; 103 pregnant women and the outcomes of their births were studied. Research and scientific work were carried out for 2020-2022. on the basis of the obstetric department of the multidisciplinary clinic of SamSMU. Based on clinical data, objective examination, ultrasound and Doppler measurements, as well as the amount of collagen type XXVI, in 66 pregnant women the condition of the postoperative scar was assessed as satisfactory and in 37 as insolvent.

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
HAC
doi
 
CC BY f
65-71
13

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Kurbaniyazova Venera Enverovna, & Kurbaniyazova Feruza Zafarjanovna. (2023). IMPROVING THE DIAGNOSTICS OF UTERUS SCAR AFTER CESAREAN SECTION. International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research, 3(10), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmscr/Volume03Issue10-12
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

Around the world, the number of caesarean sections is increasing every year. The purpose of the study was to study the consistency of the uterine scar after cesarean section in pregnant women of reproductive age; 103 pregnant women and the outcomes of their births were studied. Research and scientific work were carried out for 2020-2022. on the basis of the obstetric department of the multidisciplinary clinic of SamSMU. Based on clinical data, objective examination, ultrasound and Doppler measurements, as well as the amount of collagen type XXVI, in 66 pregnant women the condition of the postoperative scar was assessed as satisfactory and in 37 as insolvent.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

65


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

65-71

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

Around the world, the number of caesarean sections is increasing every year. The purpose of the study was to study
the consistency of the uterine scar after cesarean section in pregnant women of reproductive age; 103 pregnant
women and the outcomes of their births were studied. Research and scientific work were carried out for 2020-2022.
on the basis of the obstetric department of the multidisciplinary clinic of SamSMU. Based on clinical data, objective
examination, ultrasound and Doppler measurements, as well as the amount of collagen type XXVI, in 66 pregnant
women the condition of the postoperative scar was assessed as satisfactory and in 37 as insolvent.

KEYWORDS

Viability criteria, uterine scar, cesarean section (CS), type XXVI collagen.

INTRODUCTION

Around the world, the number of caesarean sections is

increasing every year. This is influenced by the rapid

development of modern medical science, the

improvement of surgical techniques, the emergence of

new suture materials and broad-spectrum antibiotics,

the improvement of anesthesiological care, as well as

changes in society’s attitude towards childbirth.

Caesarean section (CS) is an operative method of

delivery that is widely used at the moment. According

to the Ministry of Health for 2022, we registered 932.2

Research Article

IMPROVING THE DIAGNOSTICS OF UTERUS SCAR AFTER CESAREAN
SECTION

Submission Date:

October 20, 2023,

Accepted Date:

October 25, 2023,

Published Date:

October 30, 2023

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmscr/Volume03Issue10-12


Kurbaniyazova Venera Enverovna

Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan

Kurbaniyazova Feruza Zafarjanovna

Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijmscr

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

66


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

65-71

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

thousand births, which is the highest figure since

independence. The total fertility rate (number of births

per 1,000 inhabitants) was 26.2

in 2022, which falls

into the category of countries with a “moderately

high” fertility rate. The frequency of surgical births in

Uzbekistan is about 23% of all births. According to

statistics from the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2017-

2022, from 5100 to 5897 women per year give birth

surgically, and the number of women with a uterine

scar increased from 568 to 618, with the predominant

number of women with one scar. The majority of

women who completed childbirth through CS

corresponded to district medical associations. Among

them, primiparous women ranged from 10.5% to 17.7%.

During pregnancy, 77.2% of women had various somatic

diseases,

such

as:

obesity,

myopia,

chronic

pyelonephritis, chronic gastritis, anemia, hypertensive

conditions, neurocirculatory dystonia, hydronephrosis,

varicose veins. In 92.3% of those who underwent a CS,

repeated births ended with a repeat cesarean section

with removal of the postoperative scar. And only 7% of

women with one uterine scar were delivered through

the vaginal canal during repeated births. This shows

the need to study the reasons for the increase in CS,

improve the diagnostics of consistency and

development.

Purpose of work was to study the consistency of the

uterine scar after cesarean section in pregnant women

of reproductive age.

Materials and methods. The study is based on a clinical

and laboratory examination of 103 women of

reproductive age with a history of one uterine scar,

who were under observation in the department of

obstetrics and gynecology of the multidisciplinary

clinic of Samarkand State Medical University for the

period from 2020 to 2022. During clinical and laboratory

examination, pregnant women were divided into 2

groups: Group I - with a stable scar (n=66), Group II

with an incompetent scar (n=37). Each of these groups

was divided into subgroups according to birth

outcomes: “A”

-

with natural birth, “B”

- birth by

cesarean section. Also, 68 postpartum women were

included in the main group for rehabilitation, and the

remaining 35 were included in the comparison group

for clinical assessment of the condition of the scar in

the postoperative period and rehabilitation.

The work used general clinical research methods

(general blood and urine analysis, vaginal smear,

assessment of hemostasis), as well as special research

methods, including: laboratory research methods

(determining the amount of type XXVI collagen by

ELISA, morphological examination of the scar area),

instrumental methods (ultrasound, Dopplerometry of

uterine vessels).

Variation-statistical processing of the study results was

carried out using the Statistica 6.0 program,

determining the main indicators of variation: mean

value (M), mean errors (m), standard deviation (p). The


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

67


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

65-71

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

reliability of the results obtained was determined using

the Student's test. The difference between two means

is considered significant if the p-parameter is less than

0.05. The confidence level was at least 95%.

Results. Research and scientific work was carried out

for 2020-2022. on the basis of the obstetric department

of the multidisciplinary clinic of SamSMU, based on the

analysis of the results of a comprehensive examination

and dynamic observation of 103 women of

reproductive age with one scar on the uterus after

cesarean section, during pregnancy and in the

postpartum period. The age of the women ranged

from 18 to 40 years, the average age was 24.5±4.1

years.

Criteria for inclusion in the study:

-

written consent of pregnant women;

-

pregnant women with one scar on the uterus after

one caesarean section in history

-

gestational age 37 weeks or more at the time of

previous caesarean section

Exclusion criteria from the study:

pregnant women with scars on the uterus after

two or more caesarean sections;

use of T- and J-type incisions on the uterus during a

previous caesarean section

History of uterine rupture;

primary reconstructive operations on the uterus,

resection of the uterine angle, myomectomy and

other gynecological operations

the presence of other severe obstetric or

extragenital pathology in the acute stage.

Oncological diseases of various localizations or

high-risk groups

The intergravid period of pregnant women (from the

last CS operation to the current pregnancy) ranged

from 1 to 3 years (on average 1.8±0.8 years).

After the first CS, the average levels of collagen type

XXVI did not differ in both groups during the second

pregnancy, but after delivery its indicator showed

significant changes in the two groups. Thus, in

subgroup IA, the concentration of type XXVI collagen

was 322.28±34.5 ng/ml; upon re-examination 3 months

after birth, a significant decrease in the average

concentration of type XXVI collagen was noted, which

amounted to 164.12±6.25 ng/ml.

The average concentration of type XXVI collagen in the

main group during pregnancy was 328.22±17.5 ng/ml,

and 3 months after birth - 363.1±48.4 ng/ml. This

indicates

the

effectiveness

of

rehabilitation

procedures. The data obtained show that collagen

type XXVI can be taken as a predictor of the choice of

method of delivery.

In pregnant women with a uterine scar after CS, the

main criteria for scar failure on ultrasound were


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

68


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

65-71

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

deformation of the uterine cavity in the area of the

sutures, the presence of local folds and visualization of

the “niche” symptom in the area of the postoperative

scar.

37 pregnant women had an echo picture of the uterine

scar, characterized by the presence of atrophy and the

formation of a thin fibrous cover, a defect in the

uterine wall in the area of the scar, and inadequate

blood circulation along the scar. Uterine hypertonicity

in both study groups was 55.88% and 57.14%,

respectively; other pathological findings are reflected

in Figure No. 1.

Although 22.86% of pregnant women of the main

group and 19.11% of the comparison group were

diagnosed with echo signs of placental insufficiency,

11.42% and 11.76% of umbilical cord entanglement,

14.28% and 14.7% were diagnosed with ORP, this is not

always directly related with a uterine scar or a history

of CS, which is confirmed by statistical data.

Figure 1. Ultrasound data in the studied women (%)

According to ultrasound data, in 66 pregnant women

the presence of various elements located between full-

blooded capillaries and small-caliber capillaries was

revealed, indicating the

“consistency” of the uterine

scar.

According to the study data, at a period of 36-38

weeks, pregnant women were divided into 2 groups

14.70%

11.76%

19.11%

1.47%

55.88%

14.28%

11.42%

22.86%

0

57.14%

-20.00% -10.00%

0.00%

10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00%

Fetal growth restriction syndrome

Umbilical cord entanglement

Placental insufficiency

Placenta previa

Hypertonicity of the uterus

Comparison
group

p<0,02

p<0,02

p<0,03

p<0,05

p=0,00..


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

69


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

65-71

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

(Group I - 66 pregnant women with a clinically

“successful” scar, Group II

- 37 pregnant women with

an incompetent scar), based on the delivery data, each

of the groups was divided into 2 subgroups (A - with

natural birth, B - delivery by cesarean section): Group I

-

66 women with a clinically “significant” uterine scar,

admitted as planned. Group II consisted of 37 pregnant

women

who

were

diagnosed

with

uterine

incompetence and recommended for cesarean

section. But according to the birth outcomes, they

were also divided into 2 subgroups: Subgroup II A

included 13 women who were recommended for a

cesarean section, which they refused and were

admitted at 38 weeks or more in the second stage of

labor and had a natural delivery; Subgroup II B

consisted of 24 women with clinical signs of uterine

scar failure, who underwent repeat CS surgery as

recommended.

Figure 2. Distribution of pregnant women according to the condition of the postoperative scar

Conclusion

Based on clinical data, objective examination,

ultrasound and Doppler measurements, as well as the

amount of collagen type XXVI, in 66 pregnant women

the condition of the postoperative scar was assessed

as satisfactory and in 37 as insolvent.

REFERENCES

1.

Жаркин Н. А., Логутова Л. С., Семихова Т. Г.

Кесарево

сечение:

медицинские,

социальные

и

морально

-

этические

проблемы //Rossiiskii Vestnik Akushera

-

Ginekologa.

2019.

Т. 19. –

№. 4.

103 pregnant

Group I

Wealthy scar

(n=66)

Natural

childbirth

IA (n=42)

C-section

I B (n=24)

Group II

Incompetent

scar (n=37)

Natural

childbirth

IIA (n=13)

Caesarean

section II B

(n=24)


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

70


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

65-71

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

2.

Курбаниязова В. Э. Ранняя реабилитация

женщин, перенесших кесарево сечение, и

оптимизация ведения последующих родов

//Достижения науки и образования. –

2020.

№. 2 (56). –

С. 106

-109.

3.

Курбаниязова В. Э., Худоярова Д. Р. Реалии

Времени. Реабилитация Женщин С Рубцом

На Матке //Вестник науки и образования. –

2020.

№. 23

-1 (101).

С. 72

-78.

4.

Курбаниязова В. Э. КРИТЕРИИ ОЦЕНКИ

СОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ

ПОСЛЕОПЕРАЦИОННОГО

РУБЦА

И

РЕАБИЛИТАЦИЯ ЖЕНЩИН, ПЕРЕНЕСШИХ

КЕСАРЕВО СЕЧЕНИЕ //Перенесших Кесарево

Сечение.

5.

Курбаниязова В. Э., Ахтамова Н. А.,

Хамидова

Ш.

М.

Интенсивное

восстановление женщин репродуктивного

возраста перенесших операцию Кесарево

сечение //Проблемы биологии и медицины. –

2019.

Т. 4. –

С. 53

-55.

6.

Курбаниязова В. Э. CLINICAL, ECHOGRAPHIC,

MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING A WELL-FOUNDED

SCAR ON THE UTERUS AFTER CESAREAN

SECTION

//УЗБЕКСКИЙ

МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ

ЖУРНАЛ. –

2021.

№. SPECIAL 1.

7.

Лебеденко Е. Ю. и др. Кесарево сечение

-

мировые тенденции (обзор литературы)

//Архив акушерства и гинекологии им. ВФ

Снегирева. –

2021.

Т. 8. –

№. 1. –

С. 20

-25.

8.

Мартынов С. А., Адамян Л. В. Рубец на матке

после кесарева сечения: терминологические

аспекты //Гинекология. –

2020.

Т. 22. –

№. 5.

С. 70

-75.

9.

Ножницева О. Н., Семенов И. А., Беженарь В.

Ф. Рубец на матке после операции кесарева

сечения

и

оптимальный

алгоритм

диагностики

его

состояния

//Лучевая

диагностика и терапия. –

2019.

№. 2. –

С. 85

-

90.

10.

Ножницева О. Н., Беженарь В. Ф. Ниша рубца

на матке после кесарева сечения

-

новая

проблема

репродуктивного

здоровья

женщины //Журнал акушерства и женских

болезней. –

2020.

Т. 69. –

№. 1. –

С. 53

-62.

11.

Сафоева З. Ф., Хусаинова Ш. К., Умарова С. С.

Сравнительная оценка неврологической

симптоматики

у

новорожденных,

рожденных естественным путем и путем

операции кесарева сечения //Достижения

науки и образования. –

2021.

. 1 (73).

С.

53-57.

12.

Ткаченко

Л.

В.

и

др.

Применение

классификации Робсона для поиска путей

снижения частоты операций кесарева

сечения

//Вестник

Волгоградского

государственного

медицинского

университета. –

2020.

№. 2 (74). –

С. 87

-90.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

71


International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research
(ISSN

2771-2265)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

65-71

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

694

)

(2022:

5.

893

)

(2023:

6.

184

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

13.

Яметова Н.

М., Цхай В. Б., Домрачева М. Я.

Повторная операция кесарева сечения у

женщин с двумя и более рубцами на матке

//Медицинский вестник Юга России. –

2021.

Т. 12. –

№. 3. –

С. 86

-91.

14.

Antoine C., Young B. K. Cesarean section one

hundred years 1920

2020: the Good, the Bad

and the Ugly //Journal of Perinatal Medicine.

2021.

Т. 49. –

№. 1. –

С. 5

-16.

15.

Betran A. P. et al. Trends and projections of

caesarean section rates: global and regional

estimates //BMJ Global Health.

2021.

Т. 6. –

№. 6. –

С. e

005671.

16.

Cai J. et al. Cesarean section or vaginal delivery

to prevent possible vertical transmission from

a pregnant mother confirmed with COVID-19 to

a neonate: a systematic review //Frontiers in

medicine.

2021.

Т. 8. –

С. 634949.

17.

Enverovna K. V. MODERN APPROACHES TO

THE MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANT WOMEN

WITH UTERINE SCARS AND DELIVERY TACTICS

IN THEM //Science and innovation.

2023.

Т.

2.

№. D4. –

С. 154

-160.

18.

Enverovna K. V. MODERN APPROACHES TO

THE MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANT WOMEN

WITH UTERINE SCARS AND DELIVERY TACTICS

IN THEM //Science and innovation.

2023.

Т.

2.

№. D4. –

С. 154

-160.

19.

Enverovna

K.

V.

RELATIONSHIP

OF

POSTOPERATIVE SCAR ON THE UTERUS AND

TYPE

II

COLLAGEN

//JOURNAL

OF

BIOMEDICINE AND PRACTICE.

2023.

Т. 8. –

№. 3.

20.

Nagy S., Papp Z. Global approach of the

cesarean section rates //Journal of Perinatal

Medicine.

2021.

Т. 49. –

№. 1. –

С. 1

-4.

21.

Sung S., Mahdy H. Cesarean section

//StatPearls [Internet].

Statpearls publishing,

2023.

22.

22.

Wu Y. et al. Factors associated with

successful vaginal birth after a cesarean

section: a systematic review and meta-analysis

//BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

2019.

Т. 19.

№. 1. –

С. 1

-12.

References

Жаркин Н. А., Логутова Л. С., Семихова Т. Г. Кесарево сечение: медицинские, социальные и морально-этические проблемы //Rossiiskii Vestnik Akushera-Ginekologa. – 2019. – Т. 19. – №. 4.

Курбаниязова В. Э. Ранняя реабилитация женщин, перенесших кесарево сечение, и оптимизация ведения последующих родов //Достижения науки и образования. – 2020. – №. 2 (56). – С. 106-109.

Курбаниязова В. Э., Худоярова Д. Р. Реалии Времени. Реабилитация Женщин С Рубцом На Матке //Вестник науки и образования. – 2020. – №. 23-1 (101). – С. 72-78.

Курбаниязова В. Э. КРИТЕРИИ ОЦЕНКИ СОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ПОСЛЕОПЕРАЦИОННОГО РУБЦА И РЕАБИЛИТАЦИЯ ЖЕНЩИН, ПЕРЕНЕСШИХ КЕСАРЕВО СЕЧЕНИЕ //Перенесших Кесарево Сечение.

Курбаниязова В. Э., Ахтамова Н. А., Хамидова Ш. М. Интенсивное восстановление женщин репродуктивного возраста перенесших операцию Кесарево сечение //Проблемы биологии и медицины. – 2019. – Т. 4. – С. 53-55.

Курбаниязова В. Э. CLINICAL, ECHOGRAPHIC, MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING A WELL-FOUNDED SCAR ON THE UTERUS AFTER CESAREAN SECTION //УЗБЕКСКИЙ МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ. – 2021. – №. SPECIAL 1.

Лебеденко Е. Ю. и др. Кесарево сечение-мировые тенденции (обзор литературы) //Архив акушерства и гинекологии им. ВФ Снегирева. – 2021. – Т. 8. – №. 1. – С. 20-25.

Мартынов С. А., Адамян Л. В. Рубец на матке после кесарева сечения: терминологические аспекты //Гинекология. – 2020. – Т. 22. – №. 5. – С. 70-75.

Ножницева О. Н., Семенов И. А., Беженарь В. Ф. Рубец на матке после операции кесарева сечения и оптимальный алгоритм диагностики его состояния //Лучевая диагностика и терапия. – 2019. – №. 2. – С. 85-90.

Ножницева О. Н., Беженарь В. Ф. Ниша рубца на матке после кесарева сечения-новая проблема репродуктивного здоровья женщины //Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. – 2020. – Т. 69. – №. 1. – С. 53-62.

Сафоева З. Ф., Хусаинова Ш. К., Умарова С. С. Сравнительная оценка неврологической симптоматики у новорожденных, рожденных естественным путем и путем операции кесарева сечения //Достижения науки и образования. – 2021. – №. 1 (73). – С. 53-57.

Ткаченко Л. В. и др. Применение классификации Робсона для поиска путей снижения частоты операций кесарева сечения //Вестник Волгоградского государственного медицинского университета. – 2020. – №. 2 (74). – С. 87-90.

Яметова Н. М., Цхай В. Б., Домрачева М. Я. Повторная операция кесарева сечения у женщин с двумя и более рубцами на матке //Медицинский вестник Юга России. – 2021. – Т. 12. – №. 3. – С. 86-91.

Antoine C., Young B. K. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly //Journal of Perinatal Medicine. – 2021. – Т. 49. – №. 1. – С. 5-16.

Betran A. P. et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates //BMJ Global Health. – 2021. – Т. 6. – №. 6. – С. e005671.

Cai J. et al. Cesarean section or vaginal delivery to prevent possible vertical transmission from a pregnant mother confirmed with COVID-19 to a neonate: a systematic review //Frontiers in medicine. – 2021. – Т. 8. – С. 634949.

Enverovna K. V. MODERN APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANT WOMEN WITH UTERINE SCARS AND DELIVERY TACTICS IN THEM //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D4. – С. 154-160.

Enverovna K. V. MODERN APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANT WOMEN WITH UTERINE SCARS AND DELIVERY TACTICS IN THEM //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D4. – С. 154-160.

Enverovna K. V. RELATIONSHIP OF POSTOPERATIVE SCAR ON THE UTERUS AND TYPE II COLLAGEN //JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE AND PRACTICE. – 2023. – Т. 8. – №. 3.

Nagy S., Papp Z. Global approach of the cesarean section rates //Journal of Perinatal Medicine. – 2021. – Т. 49. – №. 1. – С. 1-4.

Sung S., Mahdy H. Cesarean section //StatPearls [Internet]. – Statpearls publishing, 2023.

Wu Y. et al. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis //BMC pregnancy and childbirth. – 2019. – Т. 19. – №. 1. – С. 1-12.