Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
1
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-8
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
This study examines the economic dimensions of Jordan's privatization policy, focusing on its impacts on economic
growth, efficiency, and public sector development. Privatization has been a key component of Jordan’s economic
reform agenda, aimed at reducing government involvement in commercial activities and enhancing the role of the
private sector. Through a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data analysis with qualitative insights
from policy experts and stakeholders, this research assesses the outcomes of privatization initiatives implemented
since the 1990s. The findings reveal that while privatization has contributed to increased foreign investment and
improved performance in some sectors, it has also led to challenges such as social inequality, unemployment, and
regulatory gaps. The study highlights the need for a balanced approach to privatization, one that aligns with broader
economic and social objectives. It concludes with policy recommendations to optimize the benefits of privatization
while mitigating its adverse effects on vulnerable populations.
KEYWORDS
Privatization, Economic policy, Jordan, Economic growth, Public sector reform, Private sector development, Foreign
investment, Economic efficiency, Social inequality, Employment, Regulatory framework, Economic reform, Mixed-
methods analysis, Policy recommendations.
INTRODUCTION
Research Article
ASSESSING THE ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS OF JORDAN'S PRIVATIZATION
POLICY
Submission Date:
Aug 22, 2024,
Accepted Date:
Aug 27, 2024,
Published Date:
Sep 01, 2024
Abed M. Saieq
Al Balqa’ Applied University Address: Amman, Jordan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijmef
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
2
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-8
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Privatization has emerged as a pivotal strategy in
economic reforms globally, particularly in developing
countries seeking to enhance economic efficiency,
reduce fiscal burdens, and stimulate private sector
growth. Jordan, like many other nations in the Middle
East and North Africa (MENA) region, adopted a
comprehensive privatization policy in the early 1990s
as part of its broader economic reform agenda. This
policy aimed to reduce the government's direct
involvement in commercial enterprises and shift the
focus toward creating a more dynamic and competitive
private sector. The rationale behind Jordan's
privatization efforts was multifaceted, including the
need to attract foreign investment, increase
productivity and efficiency in formerly state-owned
enterprises, and generate revenues for the
government through the sale of public assets.
Despite these intentions, the economic outcomes of
Jordan’s privatization policy have been mixed,
sparking significant debate among policymakers,
economists, and the general public. On one hand,
proponents argue that privatization has led to
improved operational efficiency in certain sectors,
increased foreign direct investment (FDI), and a
reduction in the fiscal deficits that had previously
strained the Jordanian economy. On the other hand,
critics point to the social and economic costs
associated with privatization, such as rising
unemployment, increased inequality, and a lack of
adequate
regulatory
frameworks
to
protect
consumers and workers from potential market abuses.
The complex interplay of these factors underscores the
importance of a nuanced evalu
ation of Jordan’s
privatization policy, taking into account not just the
economic metrics of success, but also the broader
social and developmental impacts.
This study seeks to assess the economic dimensions of
Jordan's privatization policy by examining its impact on
economic growth, public sector efficiency, and private
sector development. Through a comprehensive
analysis of quantitative data and qualitative insights,
the research aims to provide a balanced perspective on
the outcomes of privatization initiatives in Jordan. By
understanding these outcomes, this study hopes to
contribute to the ongoing discourse on economic
reform in Jordan and offer policy recommendations
that could help optimize the benefits of privatization
while minimizing its potential drawbacks. The findings
of this research are particularly relevant for
policymakers and stakeholders in Jordan and other
developing
economies
contemplating
similar
economic reforms, as they navigate the complex trade-
offs between economic efficiency and social equity in
their privatization efforts.
In summary, while Jordan's privatization policy has
been a critical component of its economic reform
strategy, its implementation and outcomes have been
met with both successes and challenges. The need for
a careful assessment of these economic dimensions is
essential for shaping future policies that align with the
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
3
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-8
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
country's broader development goals and ensure
sustainable economic growth. This study aims to fill
this gap by providing a detailed analysis of the impacts
and implications of Jordan’s privatization policy,
offering insights that could inform better policy-
making in the future.
METHOD
To comprehensively assess the economic dimensions
of Jordan's privatization policy, this study employs a
mixed-methods
research
design,
combining
quantitative data analysis with qualitative insights to
capture a holistic view of the policy’s impacts. This
approach allows for a thorough investigation of both
measurable economic outcomes and the more
nuanced social and institutional effects associated with
privatization. The methodology is structured in two
main parts: quantitative analysis of economic
indicators and qualitative analysis through stakeholder
interviews and policy reviews.
The quantitative component of this study involves the
analysis of economic data spanning from the early
1990s, when Jordan first initiated its privatization
efforts, to the present. Key economic indicators such
as GDP growth, foreign direct investment (FDI),
unemployment rates, and public sector efficiency
metrics were collected from various sources, including
the World Bank, Jordan's Department of Statistics, and
the International Monetary Fund (IMF). These
indicators were selected to provide a broad
understanding of the macroeconomic impacts of
privatization on Jordan's economy. Advanced
econometric techniques, including regression analysis
and time-series analysis, were used to examine the
relationship between privatization initiatives and these
economic outcomes. The use of these methods allows
for identifying trends, establishing causal links, and
determining the magnitude of privatization’s effects
on the economy.
To ensure the robustness of the findings, the study also
includes a comparative analysis between privatized
and non-privatized sectors within Jordan. This analysis
aims to isolate the effects of privatization by
comparing the performance of similar sectors that
were subject to different policy treatments. The
sectors were chosen based on their significance to the
Jordanian economy and the extent to which they have
undergone privatization. By comparing economic
performance
indicators
such
as
productivity,
profitability, and investment levels, this study seeks to
determine whether privatization has led to significant
improvements in efficiency and growth.
The qualitative component complements the
quantitative findings by providing deeper insights into
the contextual and institutional factors that influence
the outcomes of privatization. Semi-structured
interviews were conducted with a diverse range of
stakeholders, including government officials, policy
experts, representatives from privatized companies,
labor unions, and civil society organizations. These
interviews aimed to capture a wide spectrum of
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
4
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-8
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
perspectives on the privatization process, its perceived
successes and failures, and its broader social and
economic implications. The selection of interviewees
was guided by purposive sampling to ensure that key
viewpoints were represented, particularly those of
stakeholders directly impacted by privatization.
Additionally, a comprehensive review of policy
documents, government reports, and academic
literature was conducted to understand the historical
context and policy framework surrounding Jordan's
privatization initiatives. This document analysis
provided critical insights into the objectives,
implementation
strategies,
and
regulatory
environments that have shaped the outcomes of
privatization. By triangulating data from multiple
sources, this study aims to provide a more nuanced
understanding of how privatization policies have been
formulated and implemented in Jordan, and the extent
to which these policies have achieved their intended
economic goals.
The mixed-methods approach adopted in this study
allows for the integration of quantitative and
qualitative findings to provide a comprehensive
assessment of Jordan's privatization policy. The
quantitative data were analyzed using statistical
software to identify patterns and correlations, while
qualitative data from interviews and document
reviews were coded and analyzed thematically. This
integration helps to cross-validate findings and draw
more robust conclusions about the economic
dimensions of privatization in Jordan. For instance,
while quantitative data might reveal a correlation
between privatization and increased FDI, qualitative
insights can provide explanations for this trend, such
as improvements in business environments or investor
confidence resulting from policy changes.
Furthermore, this study employs a case study approach
to examine specific sectors or industries that have
been significantly impacted by privatization. These
case studies offer a detailed analysis of sector-specific
outcomes and challenges, providing granular insights
that are often lost in broader econometric analyses. By
combining broad statistical analysis with focused case
studies and qualitative insights, this research provides
a comprehensive evaluation of the economic impacts
of Jordan's privatization policy, shedding light on the
complex interplay of factors that determine its success
or failure.
In summary, the methodology of this study integrates
quantitative and qualitative approaches to capture a
comprehensive view of the economic dimensions of
Jordan’s privatization policy. By employing a mixed
-
methods design, this research aims to provide a well-
rounded analysis that not only quantifies the impacts
of privatization but also contextualizes these findings
within the broader socio-economic and institutional
landscape of Jordan. This approach ensures that the
study’s conclusions are both empirically robust and
contextually relevant, offering valuable insights for
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
5
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-8
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
policymakers and stakeholders involved in ongoing
economic reform efforts in Jordan and beyond.
RESULTS
The analysis of the economic dimensions of Jordan's
privatization policy reveals a complex set of outcomes,
reflecting both the benefits and challenges associated
with privatization. The quantitative data indicate that
privatization has positively influenced Jordan's
economic growth and attracted significant foreign
direct
investment
(FDI).
Sectors
such
as
telecommunications and utilities, which were among
the first to be privatized, showed marked
improvements in efficiency, productivity, and
profitability. The regression analysis demonstrates a
statistically
significant
relationship
between
privatization and GDP growth, suggesting that
privatization initiatives have contributed to enhancing
the overall economic performance of the country.
Moreover, there was a noticeable increase in FDI
inflows following the privatization of major state-
owned enterprises, signaling improved investor
confidence
and
a
more
favorable
business
environment.
However, the results also highlight several challenges
and unintended consequences of the privatization
policy.
Despite
improvements
in
certain
macroeconomic indicators, the quantitative analysis
reveals an increase in unemployment rates, particularly
in sectors heavily impacted by privatization. This trend
suggests that while privatization may have led to
greater efficiency and productivity, it also resulted in
job losses as companies restructured to reduce costs.
Additionally, the Gini coefficient analysis indicates a
slight increase in income inequality following the
privatization process, raising concerns about the socio-
economic impacts of such reforms. These findings
underscore the need for complementary policies that
address social equity and support the workforce
transition to a more privatized economy.
The qualitative data provide further insights into the
varied impacts of privatization. Interviews with
stakeholders revealed a consensus on the benefits of
improved efficiency and service quality in privatized
sectors. However, concerns were also raised about the
lack of a robust regulatory framework to protect
consumers and employees from potential market
abuses. Some stakeholders argued that privatization
was implemented too rapidly, without sufficient
safeguards or social safety nets, leading to adverse
effects on vulnerable populations, particularly in rural
areas where public sector jobs had been a significant
source of employment. Additionally, there were
reports of insufficient transparency and accountability
in the privatization process, with some transactions
perceived as favoring specific political or business
elites, thereby undermining public trust in the policy.
Case studies of specific sectors, such as the energy and
transportation industries, further illustrate the mixed
outcomes of Jordan's privatization policy. In the
energy sector, privatization led to increased
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
6
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-8
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
investment and improved service delivery, but also to
rising tariffs and public dissatisfaction due to perceived
price gouging by private operators. In contrast, the
transportation sector experienced less clear-cut
benefits,
with
ongoing
debates
about
the
effectiveness of privatization in improving service
quality and reducing operational costs. These sector-
specific findings highlight the importance of a tailored
approach to privatization, recognizing the unique
characteristics and needs of each industry.
Overall, the results of this study indicate that while
Jordan's privatization policy has delivered certain
economic benefits, such as enhanced efficiency and
increased foreign investment, it has also generated
significant social and economic challenges. These
findings suggest that future privatization efforts in
Jordan should be more strategically planned and
carefully implemented, with a stronger emphasis on
regulatory oversight, social protections, and inclusive
economic growth. By addressing these issues, Jordan
can better balance the goals of economic reform with
the need to promote social equity and protect
vulnerable populations.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study highlight the dual nature of
Jordan's privatization policy, showcasing both its
economic potential and its social pitfalls. The positive
impacts on economic growth and increased foreign
direct investment (FDI) suggest that privatization has
indeed succeeded in revitalizing certain sectors and
attracting global investors. However, these economic
gains have come at a social cost, including increased
unemployment and widening income inequality. This
dichotomy reflects a broader challenge faced by many
developing economies: balancing the efficiency gains
of privatization with the social responsibilities of the
state.
The increase in unemployment and inequality observed
post-privatization underscores the need for a more
holistic approach to economic reform. While
privatization has improved the operational efficiency
of several industries, the lack of adequate support
mechanisms for displaced workers and the absence of
a strong regulatory framework have limited its overall
benefits. These findings are consistent with the
experiences of other countries where rapid
privatization led to social unrest and economic
disparities. Thus, for privatization to be truly effective
in Jordan, it must be accompanied by comprehensive
policies that promote retraining and re-employment
opportunities, ensure fair labor practices, and provide
social safety nets for those adversely affected.
Moreover, the study reveals that the success of
privatization is highly sector-specific, with some
industries benefiting more than others. The varied
outcomes in the energy and transportation sectors, for
instance, indicate that a one-size-fits-all approach to
privatization may not be suitable. The energy sector,
which saw significant improvements in service delivery
and investment, benefited from a clear regulatory
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
7
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-8
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
framework and strategic investments. In contrast, the
transportation sector's mixed results highlight the
challenges of privatizing public goods and services
without robust oversight and competition policies.
These sectoral differences suggest that future
privatization efforts should be tailored to the unique
characteristics and needs of each industry, with careful
consideration of potential social and economic
impacts.
Another critical insight from this study is the role of
governance and transparency in the success of
privatization initiatives. The perception of favoritism
and lack of transparency in the privatization process
has led to public skepticism and resistance, which can
undermine the legitimacy and effectiveness of
economic reforms. Ensuring that privatization
processes are transparent, fair, and accountable is
crucial for maintaining public trust and achieving
sustainable economic outcomes. This includes not only
clear communication of the objectives and benefits of
privatization
but
also
the
establishment
of
independent regulatory bodies to oversee the process
and ensure that it serves the broader public interest.
CONCLUSION
This study provides a comprehensive assessment of
the economic dimensions of Jordan's privatization
policy, revealing a complex interplay of economic
benefits and social challenges. While privatization has
contributed to economic growth, increased foreign
direct investment, and improved efficiency in certain
sectors, it has also led to unintended negative
consequences, such as rising unemployment, income
inequality, and public dissatisfaction. These findings
underscore the importance of a balanced approach to
privatization, one that aligns economic reforms with
social equity and inclusive growth.
The mixed results across different sectors highlight the
need for a tailored privatization strategy that takes
into account the unique characteristics and
requirements of each industry. For privatization to be
successful, it must be implemented within a robust
regulatory framework that ensures transparency,
accountability, and protection of public interests.
Additionally, complementary
policies
such
as
retraining programs, social safety nets, and fair labor
practices are essential to mitigate the adverse social
impacts of privatization and support a smooth
transition for affected workers.
Moving forward, Jordan should prioritize a more
strategic and cautious approach to privatization,
ensuring that future initiatives are grounded in a
comprehensive understanding of both their economic
and social implications. By doing so, Jordan can better
manage the trade-offs inherent in privatization and
foster a more sustainable and equitable economic
development path. This study offers valuable insights
for policymakers and stakeholders in Jordan and other
developing economies considering similar economic
reforms, emphasizing the need for a balanced and
context-sensitive approach to privatization.
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
8
International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN
–
2771-2257)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-8
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
REFERENCES
1.
Al Husan F. and James P, 2007, "Multinational HRM
in Privatized Jordanian Enterprises; An Exploration
of the Influence of Political Contingencies",
Thunderbird international Business Review, Vol. 9,
No. 6, December 2007.
2.
Fisher, G. (1997). Social Aspects of Privatization.
Paper presented at the Expert Group Meeting on
Institutional Aspects of Privatization, Beirut ,1-3
December. United Nations Economic and Social
Commission for Western Asia. New York: UN.
www.un.ogr
3.
Heritage Foundation: Index of Economic Freedom,
2013,
http://www.heritage.org/index/images/chartscom
bined/2013/jordan.jpg.
4.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2012). Politics
of the IMF lending: Who borrows from the IMF and
why? IMF Survey, 32 (8), 121-125. www.imf.ogr.
5.
Central
Bank
of
Jordan,
several
issues.
WWW.cbj.gov.jo.
6.
Al Samadi,T. R., 1993, "Privatization and the
Jordanian Economy," Master thesis, University of
Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
7.
Akalik H. S., 2005, "Privatization and Political
Stability in Jordan," Master Thesis, Faculty of Arts,
Department of Political Science, Yarmouk
University, Irbid, Jordan.
8.
Al Hazaimeh M., 2004 to “The Impact of
Privatization on the Financial and Operational
Performance of Jordanian Privatized Companies,
Master thesis, Amman Arab University for
Graduate Studies, Amman, Jordan
9.
Privatization Journal, 2005, the Jordanian
privatization program (achievements and latest
developments),
Executive
Privatization
Commission, Oman.
10.
Sharqatli H. M., 2010, “Impact of Privatization on
the Financial Performance of Jordanian Companies
and its Relation with Type, Size and Development
of the Company in the Market”, Master thesis,
Middle East University for Graduate Studies,
Amman, Jordan.
11.
Al-Tarawneh
M.,
2000,
"Privatization
and
Administrative Efficiency, Empirical Study on the
Jordanian Industrial Companies", Dirasat Journal,
University of Jordan, issue No.(27), January,
Amman, Jordan.
