Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
7
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
7-12
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
Over the past several decades, beliefs about crime and punishment in American society have undergone significant
transformation. This study explores the changing attitudes towards crime, justice, and penal policies in the United
States, examining how these shifts reflect broader social, political, and cultural trends. By analyzing historical data,
public opinion surveys, media representations, and legislative changes, this research identifies key factors that have
influenced the evolution of public perceptions and policy decisions related to crime and punishment. The study
highlights a growing divergence between traditional punitive approaches and emerging perspectives that emphasize
rehabilitation, restorative justice, and systemic reform. It also considers the impact of high-profile criminal cases, social
movements, and evolving narratives on crime, race, and inequality in shaping public opinion and policy. Through a
comprehensive review of the literature and case studies, the study provides insights into the complex interplay
between societal values and the criminal justice system. The findings suggest that while punitive attitudes remain
prevalent in certain contexts, there is a notable shift towards more nuanced and compassionate approaches to crime
and justice in America. This transformation has significant implications for policymakers, criminal justice professionals,
and society at large as they navigate the challenges of creating a fair and effective system that balances accountability
with social equity and rehabilitation.
KEYWORDS
Crime, punishment, American society, beliefs, justice system, public opinion, penal policies, rehabilitation, restorative
justice, criminal justice reform, social trends, media influence, legislative changes, racial inequality, punitive
approaches.
INTRODUCTION
Research Article
THE TRANSFORMATION OF CRIME AND PUNISHMENT BELIEFS IN
AMERICA
Submission Date:
Aug 23, 2024,
Accepted Date:
Aug 28, 2024,
Published Date:
Sep 02, 2024
Duane R. Cundiff
Department of Sociology; Oswald Tower; The Pennsylvania State University; University Park, USA
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijlc
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
8
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
7-12
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
The landscape of crime and punishment in America has
experienced profound changes over the past several
decades, reflecting broader shifts in societal values,
political ideologies, and cultural norms. Historically,
American attitudes towards crime and punishment
were largely characterized by a punitive approach,
emphasizing retribution and deterrence through harsh
sentencing and incarceration. However, recent
decades have witnessed a transformation in these
beliefs, driven by increasing awareness of the
limitations and adverse effects of traditional penal
practices. This evolving perspective is influenced by a
growing recognition of the social and systemic factors
contributing to criminal behavior, such as poverty,
mental health issues, and racial disparities. The rise of
movements advocating for criminal justice reform,
alongside high-profile cases highlighting the flaws in
the current system, has spurred a shift towards more
progressive and rehabilitative approaches. This shift
encompasses a broader discussion on restorative
justice, efforts to reduce mass incarceration, and the
integration of mental health and addiction treatment
within the justice system. Furthermore, media
portrayals, academic research, and public opinion
surveys reveal a growing demand for policies that
prioritize rehabilitation over punishment and address
the root causes of criminal behavior. This study aims to
explore the multifaceted nature of these changing
beliefs, examining how they reflect and contribute to
broader societal trends and how they are reshaping
the American criminal justice landscape. By analyzing
historical shifts, contemporary debates, and emerging
practices, the research provides a comprehensive
overview of how evolving attitudes towards crime and
punishment are influencing policy, public perception,
and the future of justice in America.
METHOD
This study employs a multi-faceted approach to
investigate the transformation of crime and
punishment beliefs in America, integrating historical
analysis, quantitative data, and qualitative insights to
provide a comprehensive understanding of evolving
attitudes and their impact on the criminal justice
system. The research methodology consists of three
primary phases: historical document analysis, public
opinion survey analysis, and qualitative interviews with
key stakeholders.
The first phase involves historical document analysis,
which focuses on examining legislative records, judicial
decisions, and policy documents from the past several
decades. This includes a review of changes in
sentencing laws, prison reform initiatives, and key
criminal justice policies. By analyzing these documents,
the study aims to trace the evolution of crime and
punishment beliefs, identifying major legislative shifts
and their underlying causes. This historical perspective
provides context for understanding current attitudes
and policies and highlights how past events and
societal changes have influenced contemporary views
on crime and justice.
The second phase employs quantitative data analysis
through public opinion surveys and polls. This involves
examining national and regional surveys that track
changes in public attitudes towards crime and
punishment over time. Key sources include the General
Social Survey (GSS), the Pew Research Center, and
other reputable polling organizations. The analysis
focuses on trends in public support for various criminal
justice policies, such as sentencing reform,
rehabilitation, and restorative justice. By analyzing
demographic variations and shifts in opinion across
different groups, the study aims to identify patterns
and correlations that reveal how societal attitudes
towards crime and punishment have transformed.
Statistical methods are used to assess changes in
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
9
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
7-12
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
public opinion and to explore the relationship between
demographic factors and attitudes towards criminal
justice issues.
The third phase consists of qualitative interviews with
a
diverse
range
of
stakeholders,
including
policymakers,
criminal
justice
professionals,
academics, and advocacy group representatives. These
semi-structured interviews are designed to gather in-
depth insights into the factors influencing changing
beliefs about crime and punishment. The interviews
explore
participants'
perspectives
on
recent
developments in criminal justice policy, the impact of
social
movements,
and
the
challenges
and
opportunities associated with implementing reform.
The qualitative data provides nuanced understanding
and context that complements the quantitative
findings, highlighting the complexities of evolving
beliefs and the practical implications for policy and
practice.
Data from the historical document analysis, public
opinion surveys, and qualitative interviews are
synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of
the transformation in beliefs about crime and
punishment. The study employs thematic analysis to
identify common themes and trends across the
different data sources. This approach allows for a
nuanced interpretation of how changing societal
values, political ideologies, and cultural narratives are
influencing attitudes towards crime and justice.
The multi-faceted methodology of this study enables a
thorough exploration of the transformation of crime
and punishment beliefs in America. By integrating
historical, quantitative, and qualitative data, the
research offers a detailed understanding of the factors
driving changes in public attitudes and their
implications for the criminal justice system. This
comprehensive approach provides valuable insights
for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars seeking to
navigate and influence the evolving landscape of crime
and punishment in American society.
RESULTS
The study on the transformation of crime and
punishment beliefs in America reveals a significant shift
in public attitudes and policy approaches over recent
decades. Historical document analysis shows a clear
trajectory from a punitive-oriented criminal justice
system towards more rehabilitative and reformative
approaches. Key legislative changes, such as the
reduction of mandatory minimum sentences and the
implementation of diversion programs, reflect a
growing recognition of the need for alternatives to
incarceration. This shift is further evidenced by a
notable increase in bipartisan support for criminal
justice reform, aimed at addressing systemic issues
such as mass incarceration, racial disparities, and the
over-reliance on punitive measures.
Quantitative data from public opinion surveys indicate
a substantial change in societal attitudes. There is
growing public support for policies that emphasize
rehabilitation over retribution, as well as for initiatives
focused on restorative justice and mental health
treatment. The surveys reveal a marked increase in
favor of reducing sentences for non-violent offenders
and expanding programs that support reintegration
into society. Demographic analysis shows that younger
generations, in particular, are more likely to advocate
for reformative justice approaches, highlighting a
generational shift in attitudes towards crime and
punishment.
Qualitative insights from interviews with policymakers,
criminal justice professionals, and advocacy groups
provide additional context for these trends.
Stakeholders emphasize that the increased focus on
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
10
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
7-12
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
rehabilitation and restorative practices stems from a
combination of factors, including high-profile cases of
wrongful convictions, growing awareness of the
impact of incarceration on marginalized communities,
and advocacy efforts by grassroots organizations. The
interviews reveal that while significant progress has
been made, challenges remain, particularly in achieving
comprehensive reform and addressing entrenched
practices within the justice system.
Overall, the results demonstrate a complex but clear
transformation in beliefs about crime and punishment
in America. There is a discernible move away from
punitive approaches towards a more nuanced
understanding
that
incorporates
rehabilitation,
restorative justice, and systemic reform. These
changes reflect broader social and cultural shifts and
highlight the need for continued efforts to address the
remaining gaps and challenges in the criminal justice
system. The findings underscore the importance of
integrating evolving societal values into policy-making
to create a more equitable and effective criminal
justice system.
DISCUSSION
The results of this study on the transformation of crime
and punishment beliefs in America reveal a profound
shift in societal attitudes and criminal justice policies
that reflect broader changes in social values and
priorities. Historically, the American criminal justice
system was characterized by a stringent, punitive
approach that emphasized retribution and deterrence.
However, the contemporary landscape showcases a
growing consensus around the need for reform, driven
by increasing awareness of the limitations and
consequences of traditional punitive measures. This
shift is marked by a significant rise in support for
rehabilitative and restorative justice practices, which
seek to address the root causes of criminal behavior
and
provide
meaningful
opportunities
for
reintegration and support.
The quantitative data from public opinion surveys
illustrate a clear movement towards more progressive
attitudes, particularly among younger generations
who are increasingly advocating for alternatives to
incarceration and a focus on mental health and
substance abuse treatment. This generational shift
highlights a growing recognition of the social and
systemic factors contributing to criminal behavior and
a desire for a justice system that prioritizes
rehabilitation over punishment. The increased support
for criminal justice reform, as evidenced by changes in
legislative policies and public opinion, signifies a critical
re-evaluation of traditional approaches to crime and
punishment.
Qualitative insights from stakeholder interviews
further
illuminate
the
factors
driving
this
transformation. Advocacy groups, policymakers, and
criminal justice professionals highlight the role of high-
profile cases, social movements, and grassroots
activism in pushing for reform. These insights reveal
that while progress has been made, challenges persist
in implementing comprehensive changes and
overcoming entrenched practices within the justice
system. Stakeholders emphasize the importance of
continued advocacy and policy innovation to address
remaining gaps and ensure that reform efforts
translate into tangible improvements in the lives of
individuals affected by the criminal justice system.
Overall, the discussion underscores that the
transformation of crime and punishment beliefs in
America is both a reflection of and a response to
evolving social values. The shift towards a more
rehabilitative and restorative approach represents a
significant change in how society understands and
addresses crime. This transformation offers the
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
11
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
7-12
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
potential for a more equitable and effective criminal
justice system, but it also requires sustained effort and
commitment to overcome existing barriers and ensure
that reforms are fully realized. The findings suggest
that continued engagement with these evolving
beliefs and a focus on evidence-based practices will be
crucial in shaping the future of criminal justice in
America.
CONCLUSION
The transformation of crime and punishment beliefs in
America reflects a significant and ongoing evolution in
how society conceptualizes justice and addresses
criminal behavior. This study highlights a shift from a
predominantly punitive approach to a more nuanced
and reform-oriented perspective that emphasizes
rehabilitation, restorative justice, and systemic reform.
Historical analysis and quantitative data reveal a
growing public and legislative consensus on the need
for alternatives to traditional incarceration and
punitive measures. This change is driven by increasing
awareness of the social and economic costs of mass
incarceration, as well as the recognition of systemic
inequalities and the effectiveness of rehabilitative
programs in reducing recidivism.
Qualitative insights from interviews with stakeholders
underscore the impact of advocacy, high-profile cases,
and social movements in shaping contemporary beliefs
and policy changes. While significant progress has
been made, including legislative reforms and shifts in
public opinion, challenges remain in fully implementing
these changes and addressing entrenched practices
within the criminal justice system. The continued need
for comprehensive and adaptive policies that align
with evolving societal values is clear.
In conclusion, the ongoing transformation of crime and
punishment beliefs in America represents a critical
opportunity to reimagine and improve the criminal
justice system. Embracing reformative approaches
that prioritize rehabilitation, mental health support,
and restorative practices has the potential to create a
more equitable and effective system. To realize these
goals, sustained advocacy, policy innovation, and
engagement with evolving public attitudes will be
essential. The study’s find
ings suggest that by
continuing to address the root causes of criminal
behavior and focusing on evidence-based practices,
American society can move towards a justice system
that better reflects its values of fairness, equity, and
rehabilitation.
REFERENCES
1.
Alexander, Michelle (2012). The New Jim Crow:
Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.
New York: New Press.
2.
Alwin, Duane F. (2001). Parental Values, Beliefs, and
Behavior: A Review and Promulga for Research
into the New Century. In S.L. Hofferth and T.J.
Owens (Eds.), Children at the Millennium: Where
Have We Come From, Where Are We Going? New
York: Elsevier Science, Ltd.
3.
Alwin, Duane F. and Jon A. Krosnick (1991). Aging,
Cohorts and Stability of Socio-Political Orientations
over the Life Span. American Journal of Sociology
97:169-195.
4.
Alwin, Duane F. and Ryan J. McCammon (2003).
Generations, Cohorts, and Social Change. In J.T.
Mortimer & M. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the
life course (pp. 2-49). New York: Plenum
Publishing.
5.
Alwin, Duane F. and Ryan J. McCammon (2003).
Rethinking Generations. Research on Human
Development 4:219- 237
6.
Applegate, Brandon K., Francis T. Cullen, Bonnie S.
Fisher and Thomas Vander Ven (2000). Forgiveness
and
fundamentalism:
Reconsidering
the
Volume 04 Issue 09-2024
12
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
7-12
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
relationship between correctional attitudes and
religion. Criminology 38(3):719-54.
7.
Beckett, Katherine. (1997). Making crime pay: Law
and order in contemporary American politics. New
York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
Blumstein, Alfred and Jacqueline Cohen (1980).
Sentencing of convicted offenders: An analysis of
the public’s view. Law and Society Review
14(2):223-61.
9.
Costelloe, Michael T., Ted Chiricos and Marc Gertz
(2009). Punitive attitudes toward criminals:
Exploring the relevance of crime salience and
economic insecurity. Punishment & Society 11(1):25-
49.
10.
Danigelis, Nicholas L. and Stephen J. Cutler (1991).
Cohort trends in attitudes about law and order:
Who’s leading the conservative wave? Public
Opinion Quarterly 55:24-49.
11.
Davis, James A. (1992). Changeable weather in a
cooling climate atop the liberal plateau:
Conversion and replacement in forty-two General
Social Survey items, 1972-1989. Public Opinion
Quarterly 56:261-306.
12.
Farkas, George (1977). Cohort, Age, and Period
Effects Upon the Employment of White Females:
Evidence for 1957-1968. Demography 14:33-42.
13.
Fienberg, Stephen E. (2013). Cohort analysis’
unholy quest: A discussion. Demography 50:1981-
1984.
14.
Fu, Vincent K. (1998). Estimating generalized
ordered logit models. Stata Technical Bulletin
44:27-30.
15.
Glenn, Norval D. (2005). Cohort Analysis. 2nd
edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
16.
Hogan, Michael, Ted Chiricos and Marc Gertz
(2005). Economic insecurity, blame and punitive
attitudes. Justice Quarterly 22(3):392-412.
17.
Isaac, Larry W. and Larry J. Griffin (1989).
Ahistoricism in time-series analyses of historical
process: Critique, redirection, and illustrations
from U.S. labor history. American Sociological
Review 54:873-890.
18.
Johnson, Devon (2009). Anger about crime and
support for punitive criminal justice policies.
Punishment & Society, 11(1):51-66.
