Volume 02 Issue 08-2022
14
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
08
Pages:
14-18
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.489
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
In this article, socio-political features of information terrorism and its prevention are analyzed from a scientific and
practical point of view. In addition, the prevention of information terrorism is becoming more and more important to
study this dangerous phenomenon from a deep scientific point of view, which is increasingly changing, complicated
and improving, and information terrorism is a large-scale negative factor of a social, political, legal, economic, criminal
nature, as well as in inter-national and inter-confessional relations. It is scientifically proven that it manifests itself as a
product of the constant interaction of painful processes.
KEYWORDS
Information, information terrorism, information war, international terrorism, information-psychological war,
information-ideological threat, psycho-intellectual influence.
INTRODUCTION
Humanity has faced terrorist manifestations for a long
time, but until today there is no general view of
terrorism. Terrorism is usually seen as a conflict
between the rich and the poor, an expression of
jealousy, an expression of the contradictions between
modern and traditional societies. It is also seen as a
conflict between religious radicalism and extremism.
According to some political scientists, new
technologies - literacy has led to an unprecedented
increase in the political thinking of large sections of
Research Article
INFORMATION TERRORISM AND SOCIO-POLITICAL FEATURES OF ITS
PREVENTION
Submission Date:
August 11, 2022,
Accepted Date:
August 21, 2022,
Published Date:
August 26, 2022
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume02Issue08-04
Bahadir T. Makhmudboev
PhD student, Gulistan State University, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijlc
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 02 Issue 08-2022
15
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
08
Pages:
14-18
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.489
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
society, as a result of which humanity has become very
sensitive to nationalism. In other words, the world has
begun to understand inequality politically. Poverty in
economically developing countries is considered by
many as one of the reasons for the spread of terrorism.
However, the 9/11 planners came from relatively
wealthy families.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Terrorism is a dangerous land and cold judgment is
more important to approach than its level of
development. There is a view that terrorism has always
accompanied humanity throughout its history.
Terrorism as a political outpost was created at the
same time as explosives and telecommunications.
Explosives, although less likely to be detected at the
same
time,
caused
more
damage,
and
telecommunications allowed terrorists to transmit
information faster in space, allowing terrorists to be
known, make their actions a big show, and gather large
numbers of fearful spectators.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
There are cases where a terrorist has different
qualifications by different people: for one he is a
terrorist, for another he is a liberator. But this is a false
definition, to call each thing by its name. Often in the
21st century, terrorists try to use it for political
purposes. In the case of New Zealand, Erdogan often
tried to point out that it was aimed first at Turkey and
then at Muslims. He also used those videos in his
political campaign, which is very reprehensible, it
should not be covered like this, it should be used for its
own benefit. The same was used against the Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt. But it mainly depends on the
behavior of the person, his mental state that controls
such actions. Most of the terrorist organizations
currently registered in the world originate from the
Middle East. But their manifestation is mainly observed
outside the Middle East. Such terrorists operating in
developed countries, but registered in such
organizations, are mostly registered in those countries,
they are educated youth. But the exact reasons for
their actions are not yet clear. And it has not yet been
studied by anti-terrorist forces. Of course, there are
many reasons, such as religious. What is happening in
the Middle East, what is being promoted by the forces
there, is showing these young people as anti-Islamic
movements and thus encouraging the young people in
the Western countries that are carrying out airstrikes in
the Middle East to do the same. At the meeting,
Shavkat Mirziyoyev suggested that Uzbekistan
develop a generalized international legal document -
the UN International Convention on the Rights of
Youth - aimed at the formation and implementation of
youth policy in today’s conditions of rapid
development of globalization and information and
communication technologies. stressed that he must
make a firm commitment to upgrade to one of his most
important life priorities [1].
In the example of the terrorist attacks of September 11,
2001, Al Qaeda was blamed for the attack on the United
States; At that time, the international coalition against
terrorism followed the following principle: They were
looking for structures-leaders. Now, for example, the
“Islamic State” is no longer a structure, but a
movement with serious ideological influence. And the
presence of leaders, in general, does not change
anything, whether there are leaders or not, in fact, that
spark has been given, that is, it has already been
pushed into activity. Therefore, the concept of this
struggle must change. That is, there is no need to look
for the structure hidden in those parts of the Agwan-
Pakistan border at that time. (This structure was in
Syria-Iraq), unlike Osama bin Laden, the leaders seem
Volume 02 Issue 08-2022
16
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
08
Pages:
14-18
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.489
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
to be hiding now. Here we need to be closely
interested in an event or change. That is, we will have
to work separately with the local population, ethnic-
religious communities, effectively using the means of
solving the problems of education, migration, working
with refugees, as well as communication of
civilizations, what is going on in the mind of every
young Muslim, what motivates him to terrorism.
AN
ALYSIS АND RESULTS
The phenomenon of “terrorism” usually contradicts
the international regulations and the world order. And
the United States is the main guarantor of the modern
world order, so the United States must take a clear
stand against international terrorism.
Globalism, designed to unite two opposing geopolitical
burdens, actually began to serve purely Atlantic
(thalassocracy) interests. Indeed, the “land” (the East)
was defeated in the cold war. Two approaches were
put forward to interpret the new global situation:
These include Huntington’s theory of the clash of
civilizations and Fukuyama’s theory of the end of
history. These include Huntington’s theory [2] of the
clash of civilizations and Fukuyama’s theory of the end
of history. However, Russia was not completely
defeated, nor was the US position fully established in
the rest of the world. The United States is gradually
approaching the imperative of world domination.
Things went well under Russian President Boris Yeltsin
(Russia was moving westward), but things changed
under Vladimir Putin. At that time, both Russia and the
United States were the main targets of terrorists, and
the United States tried to use this situation to achieve
its goals. This period was the most terrible event in the
history of international terrorism, on September 11,
2001, terrorists managed to carry out large-scale
operations. Two civilian planes crashed into two
buildings of the World Trade Center in New York, and
another into the Pentagon in Washington. 2977 people
died, about 6300 were injured. In doing so, terrorism
has revealed itself as an institution capable of
terrorizing even the citizens of a leading superpower
[3]. It is highly doubtful that the US supersonic forces
were able to control the chaotic flight of three civilian
aircraft at the same time. A number of details of the
organization of a real terrorist act were dubious and
could not be carried out without the permission of the
higher echelons. At that time, the whole world,
including the Russian Federation, supported the
United States and expressed its readiness to cooperate
against the enemy of mankind. Al-Qaeda claimed
responsibility for the attack, and its leader, Osama bin
Laden, was named the number 1 terrorist. In fact, the
US achieved its goal by conducting a tough foreign
policy in the name of fighting terrorism, its first strike
was against the Taliban regime in Afghanistan (2001).
The war against the Taliban continues to this day, and
NATO troops are still in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is a
key and extremely important country of strategic
importance. The implementation of the Anaconda plan
proposed by Mehen, in this case, would allow Russia to
drown in the ring. In 2003, another missing element of
the ring was added: Iraq, today only two parts remain:
Syria and Iran. It is clear that the civil war in Syria is
sponsored by the US and Western civilization, and
readiness for active military action against Iran is only
on the agenda of Israel, a lifelong friend of the US.
Indeed, after the collapse of the USSR, it took the
United States more than a decade to fundamentally
transition to a new strategic concept. In September
2002, the George W. Bush administration presented an
elaborate ‘National Security Strategy” that reaffirmed
the United States’ intent t
o become a global
“hegemon.” The doctrine of deterrence and
deterrence, which served the United States effectively
Volume 02 Issue 08-2022
17
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
08
Pages:
14-18
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.489
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
in the nuclear age, was decided to be less effective in
protecting the country from asymmetric threats posed
by non-state political actors fo
r “irrational’ or
ideological reasons. The new doctrine confirmed that
the United States now acts unilaterally with “imperial
arrogance” to protect its interests. The United States
reserves the right to suspend or change political
regimes in adversary countries to address perceived
threats [4]. An even more brutal imperial position was
that the United States would prevent the growth of
any military capacity in the world comparable to that of
the United States. This was the doctrine of
“sovereignty” and refl
ected the direction of the United
States to act independently without the help of allies,
known as the “new American empire” ideology.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONS
The world order, which is the most important problem
of the United States in the era of globalization, is
fundamentally changing in world politics. Professor S.
Otamuratov said: “Globalization is the enlargement of
parts, becoming a whole. More precisely, under the
strong pressure of highly developed countries, it is a
manifestation of the unity of nations, countries and
regions in all areas [5]. According to B.Umarov’s
conclusion: “...the process of globalization, along with
giving mankind great opportunities in terms of mutual
information exchange, strengthening of relations,
expansion of production speed, has also begun to
reveal problems that have been growing for years and
centuries” [6].
REFERENCES
1.
Mirziyoev Sh.M. “President of the Republic of
Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev gave a speech
at the 72nd session of the United Nations
General Assembl
y on September 19.”
-
uza.uz/oz/politics/zbekistan-prezidenti-
shavkat-mirziyeev-bmt-general-assembly-20-
09-2017
2.
Huntington S. Clash of civilizations, M., 2003.
//http://grachev62.narod.ru/hantington/conten
t.htm
3.
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/911
_archive/
4.
Cain, Anthony C. Iran’s Strategic Culture and
Weapons of Mass Destruction.
—
Air War
College Maxwell Paper No. 26, April 2002
5.
Otamuratov S. Globalization and the nation. -
Tashkent.: New age generation, 2008. - p. 19.
6.
Umarov
B.
Conflicts
of
globalization:
economic, social and spiritual aspects. -
Tashkent.: Spirituality, 2006. - p. 28.
7.
http://www.planet-of-
people.org/htmls/rus/global_problems/terroris
m_istoria_mezhdunarodnogo.htm
8.
Bruce Hoffman. Inside terrorism. Columbia
University Press, 2006, p. 71
9.
Dugin A.G. Fundamentals of geopolitics. M.:
Arktogeya, 1997,
էջ
100:
10.
Important events and dates of recent history of
Uzbekistan. Chronicle. 2017 year. -
T.: “Sparks
of Literature’, 2019.
- 548 p.
11.
Mirziyoev Sh.M. From a speech at a meeting
with representatives of creative intellectuals of
Uzbekistan,
Tashkent
city.
04.08.2017.
www.uza.uz
12.
The idea of national independence: a textbook
for the undergraduate level of higher
education
of
the
Republic
of
Uzbekistan.//Responsible editor I. Ergashev.
Tashkent.: Academy, 2005.-p.294.
Volume 02 Issue 08-2022
18
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
(ISSN
–
2771-2214)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
08
Pages:
14-18
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.489
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
13.
G.G. Pocheptsov. Psychological wars. M.: Refl-
book, K.: Vakler. 2000. -p. 58-59.
