In-depth study of the national literary heritage based on manuscript and lithographic sources and archival documents, scientific research, and its use in order to raise the morale of the society have become one of the most urgent tasks of literary studies today. After all, "A society cannot imagine its future without developing and strengthening its spiritual potential, spiritual and moral values in the minds of people." Today, it is especially important to study the literary process of the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, the legacy of enlightened creators who lived and worked in this period and promoted the nation to high culture and enlightenment. Therefore, "... the basis of the development of society, the only force that will save it from inevitable destruction is enlightenment. Remember the events that happened in Turkestan at the beginning of our century. Why was the enlightenment movement stronger than ever in this country in those years? After all, it was possible to wake up the country, which fell into the entanglements of tsarist Russia and was in complete decline, to open the eyes of the people only through enlightenment.
In this regard, he is a great representative of Uzbek literature of the national renaissance period, he left a rich legacy as a poet and writer, literary critic and translator, historian and ethnographer, he made a great contribution to the development of national spirituality with his calligraphy and journalistic activities, he is a famous person of his time. It is important to research the work of Furqat, the son of Furqat, the son of Zakirjon Khalmuhammad, who was a healer of the country's ailments as one of the doctors-judges, especially the eighteen-year period of the poet's life abroad, based on the first sources. There is a certain amount of research in folklore that comments on the period of the poet's life and creative activity abroad. Nevertheless, the results of their analysis show that there is much work to be done in this regard. The earliest information about this can be found in the 32nd issue of the "Tarjimon" newspaper, published under the editorship of Ismailbek Gasprali, on August 18, 1896. In the article titled "Koshghar" in the newspaper, Furqat is recognized as a famous Uzbek poet and tourist. His journalistic article about the cultural life of Yorkent is discussed. The article is important in studying the attitude of modern press to Furqat's work. "Shoro" magazine, published in Orenburg at the beginning of the 20th century, and its position in the Turkestan jadidist movement are clear to experts. The full publication of Furqat's work "From the language of Muhammas Muhammad Khudoyor Khan" in the first issue of this magazine in 1909 is another important evidence that modern thinkers were very interested in the poet's work.
Until now, several collections of articles 5 , pamphlets 6 , critical-biographical essays 7 , methodological manuals 8 and monographic works 9 have been created, in which Furqat's life and work abroad have been researched to one degree or another. In these studies, certain achievements were made in terms of studying the period of Furqat's life and creative activity abroad. In our opinion, the scientific results achieved in them can be classified as follows: 1. The route of Furqat's trip to foreign countries was determined based on the direction of the travel routes at that time .
2. New sources related to the poet's life and creative activity abroad were identified, put into scientific circulation, researched and analyzed .
3. A scientific analysis of several works written by Furqat abroad was carried out .
4. Various opinions were expressed about the poet's reasons for going abroad and not returning to the country. It can be seen that certain achievements have been made in literary studies in the scientific study of the period of Furqat's life and work abroad. However, it is impossible not to mention one feature that is characteristic of most of these studies, especially scientific works created during the Shura period, which is clearly visible and often does not correspond to the original essence. Despite this, in the interpretation of almost every poem, every work, the approach based on the requirements of the communist ideology, an attempt to make the poet unhappy with the system he lives in, to be a victim, and to artificially set him against religion and religious people is evident. . Therefore, it shows how urgent tasks are to reevaluate these works based on a new way of thinking, to study them first of all as examples of art and to determine their place in the history of our literature. Without disparaging the scientific results achieved in these studies, it should be noted that the following issues, which are important in studying the period of Furqat's life and work abroad, have not been sufficiently studied:
1. Reasons for furqat to go abroad and not to return to the country.
2. Poet's attitude to the colonial policy of Tsarist Russia.
3. Scientific analysis of some of Furqat's works written abroad (for example, "Qavaidi Chin va umuroti politiki", "In the description of Russian soldiers", "Masarratnoma", etc.).
4. How long the poet stayed in each foreign country.
5. Textual analysis of Furqat's works written abroad.
The following issues have not been studied at all: 1. Furqat's religious-educational works ("Hajnoma" and poems in this direction) created during his stay in Arab countries;
2. Comparison of the works written abroad with the first sources;
3. The attitude of foreign scientists to the poet's life and work;
4. Analysis of foreign publications of Furqat's works. The topic of this scientific work is also relevant because it is an attempt to solve these problems.
