STUDENTLERDI BIRLESTIRIW: XALÍQARALÍQ IZERTLEWLER HÁM PÁNLER BOYINSHA BIRGE
ISLESIW 1-XALÍQARALÍQ STUDENTLER KONFERENCIYASÍ. NÓKIS, 2025-JÍL 20-21-MAY
__
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
101
4. –lı / –li / –lu / –lü
This suffix forms adjectives and nouns indicating possession or relation.
Example:
köngüllü
– ‘willing, with heart’ (köngül – heart + lü)
Kazakh equivalent:
көңілді
The Kazakh -ді / -ты / -лі suffixes are context-dependent but share the same semantic function
— to express possession of a quality.
These examples illustrate that many derivational suffixes used in Kutadgu Bilig have survived
in modern Kazakh with minimal phonological change. Their function remains largely the same, which
is a testament to the stability of Turkic morphological structures over time. This linguistic continuity
emphasizes the deeprooted connections between Old Turkic and modern Kazakh, highlighting the
relevance of historical texts in understanding present-day language dynamics.
Conclusion.
тIn conclusion, the comparative analysis of derivational suffixes in Kutadgu Bilig
and modern Kazakh highlights the rich historical continuity within the Turkic language family. The
study has demonstrated that many of the affixes used in this 11th-century text are still present in
Kazakh, albeit with some phonological and morphological adaptations. These suffixes serve
fundamental roles in word formation, creating adjectives, nouns, and verbs that expand the meaning
of root words and reflect the underlying structure of the language.
Through this analysis, it is evident that the preservation of these suffixes over centuries
underscores the enduring connection between the historical Turkic language and its modern variants.
The similarities between Old Turkic and Kazakh affixation patterns are a testament to the linguistic
resilience and cultural continuity that have shaped the Kazakh language.
This research not only contributes to the field of historical linguistics but also reinforces the
importance of studying classical Turkic texts for understanding the evolution of modern Turkic
languages. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity of preserving linguistic heritage in the context of
cultural identity, as the transformation of these derivational elements reflects the dynamic nature of
language in a historical context.
References
1. Taş, İbrahim.
Kutadgu Bilig’de Söz Yapımı
. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, 2015.
2. Dilaçar, A.
Kutadgu Bilig İncelemesi.
Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, 2020. – pp. 3-23.
3. Arat, Reşit Rahmeti.
Kutadgu Bilig I.
Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, 1999. – pp. 25-26.
4. Banarlı, Nihad Sâmi.
Resimli Türk Edebiyatı Tarihi I.
Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı
Yayınları, 12th edition, 2016. – pp. 230-231-232-237.
5. Korkmaz, Zeynep.
Türkiye Türkçesi Grameri.
Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, 2009. – p.
21.
6. Ergin, Muharrem.
Üniversiteler İçin Türk Dili.
İstanbul: Bayrak Yayınları, 2009. – pp. 194-
214-230-235-248.
THE NATURE OF LINGUISTIC LANGUAGE AS A SYMBOLIC SYSTEM: SEMIOTIC
AND COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE
Obidova Zulhumor Orifjon qizi,
Student of Chirchik State Pedagogical University
Scientific adviser: Z. A.Umirova ,
Chirchik State Pedagogical University, EFL teacher
ABSTRACT. Language is a vital element of human interaction, serving not only as a means of
communication but also as a symbolic system for conveying meaning. The core of language’s function
lies in its capacity to represent abstract ideas, experiences, and objects through symbols. This paper
STUDENTLERDI BIRLESTIRIW: XALÍQARALÍQ IZERTLEWLER HÁM PÁNLER BOYINSHA BIRGE
ISLESIW 1-XALÍQARALÍQ STUDENTLER KONFERENCIYASÍ. NÓKIS, 2025-JÍL 20-21-MAY
__
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
102
explores the symbolic nature of language, examining it through perspectives drawn from semiotics,
cognitive linguistics, and social theory. The analysis underscores that the power of language lies in its
symbolic capacity, which allows for the creation and exchange of meaning in dynamic social contexts.
Keywords: language as a symbolic system, semiotics, linguistic signs, cognitive linguistics,
symbolic representation in language, social functions of language, metaphorical language, language
and cognition
INTRODUCTION. Language is more than a tool for communication; it operates as a symbolic
system that enables individuals to represent and understand the world. Words, phrases, and
grammatical forms function as symbols that do not inherently possess meaning but acquire it through
social conventions. These symbolic systems allow humans to categorize their experiences, express
abstract thoughts, and articulate complex ideas. The flexibility of language, which adapts over time
according to shared norms, ensures that it remains an effective tool for expression and understanding.
By viewing language through the lens of symbolism, we gain deeper insight into how meaning is
constructed and interpreted in different contexts and societies [1].
Methodology.This research follows a qualitative, theoretical approach, utilizing a broad review
of literature to examine the symbolic role of language. Sources from semiotics, cognitive linguistics,
and discourse analysis were explored, focusing on the ways in which language functions as a system
of symbols. Scholarly works from experts like Chandler (2007), Evans (2009), Gee (2014), and
Tomasello (2010) have been integral to understanding the relationship between language and
meaning construction. These theories reveal that language not only conveys meaning but actively
shapes how we think and interact with the world.
Discussions and Results.Language functions through signs, where each sign consists of a form
(the sound or written symbol) and a meaning (the concept it represents). The connection between form
and meaning is arbitrary, governed by social agreements rather than any inherent connection between
the sign and the object it symbolizes. For example, the word “book” is not related to the physical
object it represents, yet it is widely accepted as a symbol for that object in English. This arbitrariness
is key to the adaptability of language, allowing it to evolve and reflect new meanings as society
changes.
The symbolic nature of language also plays a central role in cognitive processes. According to
cognitive linguistics, language is not just a reflection of the world but also a tool for organizing and
structuring thought. It enables individuals to conceptualize abstract ideas, categorize experiences, and
make sense of the world in symbolic terms. Metaphors, such as “time is money” or “life is a journey,”
are not literal but represent symbolic ways of thinking about time and life. These metaphors shape
how individuals perceive abstract concepts by providing a symbolic framework for understanding [2].
In addition, language serves as a powerful social tool. It functions symbolically by representing
identity, status, and power within a given social context. The way individuals use language through
word choice, tone, and structure symbolizes social roles, relationships, and values. For example, the
formal or informal register one uses can symbolize respect, familiarity, or authority. This social aspect
of language highlights its role not only in communication but in shaping social identities and group
dynamics. Language thus becomes a tool for negotiating power, influence, and social cohesion within
communities [ 3].
Language also plays a vital role in education, acting as a symbolic mediator in learning. In
academic settings, language helps students internalize complex ideas and engage with abstract
knowledge. Textbooks, discussions, and lectures all rely on linguistic symbols to convey information
and foster understanding. Language’s role in education is not limited to the transmission of facts; it
also facilitates cognitive growth by enabling students to process, reflect on, and transform their
understanding of new concepts [ 4].
STUDENTLERDI BIRLESTIRIW: XALÍQARALÍQ IZERTLEWLER HÁM PÁNLER BOYINSHA BIRGE
ISLESIW 1-XALÍQARALÍQ STUDENTLER KONFERENCIYASÍ. NÓKIS, 2025-JÍL 20-21-MAY
__
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
103
Furthermore, the symbolic nature of language contributes to the construction of meaning in social
and cultural contexts. Language does not merely describe the world; it actively shapes how individuals
interact with it. Through the use of symbols, language enables the creation of shared understandings,
collective memories, and cultural identities. As language evolves, it reflects changes in society,
incorporating new symbols to represent emerging concepts, technologies, and social structures [5].
CONCLUSION.Language is far more than a tool for everyday communication it is a symbolic
system that allows humans to represent, organize, and interpret their experiences. Through symbols,
language makes abstract thought and complex social interaction possible. It enables individuals to
express emotions, conceptualize the future, and reflect on the past, all through a system of signs.
Language's symbolic nature is not static it adapts and evolves, reflecting the dynamic relationship
between society, culture, and cognition. Understanding language as a symbolic system is essential for
appreciating its role in human life, as it shapes how we think, communicate, and understand the world
around us. Language is much more than just a way to talk to each other it's a powerful system that
helps us make sense of our world. By using symbols, language allows us to think in abstract ways,
connect with others, and navigate complex social situations. It gives us the ability to express our
feelings, imagine the future and reflect on our past experiences all through the use of signs and
symbols. What's even more fascinating is that language is always changing. As society and culture
evolve, so does the way we communicate, reflecting the shifting ideas, values, and technologies that
shape our lives. Understanding language as a symbolic system helps us appreciate its crucial role in
how we think, how we interact with one another, and how we make sense of everything around us.
It’s a system that not only allows us to communicate but also shapes the very way we understand and
experience the world.
References:
1.Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The Basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
2. Evans, V. (2009). How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning
Construction. Oxford University Press.
3. Gee, J. P. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (4th ed.).
Routledge.
4. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday's Introduction to Functional
Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
5. Tomasello, M. (2010). Origins of Human Communication. MIT Press.
6. Yule, G. (2020). The Study of Language (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
DÚRKINLESKEN DIDAKTIKALÍQ QOSÍQLAR
Óteshov Berdaq Bazarbaevich
QMU magistrantı
Dúrkin qosıqalar janrlıq, idea-tematikalıq, mazmunlıq, formalıq jaqtan bir neshe shuwmaqlardan
turatuǵın poetikalıq forma bolıp esaplanadı. Dúrkinler belgili maqset penen bir pútinlikke birlesedi.
Dúrkin teoriyalıq principleri haqqında ilimpaz M.Orazımbetova óz miynetinde arnawlı izertlegen.
Onıń principlerin islewde jáhán ádebiyattanıwı iliminiń jetiskeliklerinen, izertlew jumıslarınan
paydalanǵan. Sóz etilip atırǵan dissertaciyada ilimpaz dúrkin haqqında: «Dúrkin áyyemgi Greciyada
cikl (kuklos-krug, koleso, yaǵnıy sheńber, dóńgelek) sózinen kelip shıqqan bolıp qanday da bir
waqıyalardıń sheńber ishinde sáwleleniwi túsiniledi», [2-12] - dep, dúrkin sózine sıpatlama berip
ótedi. Ilimpazdıń aytıwınsha, lirikalıq qaharman ishki oy-tolǵanısların, ishki sezimlerin dúrkin
quramındaǵı qosıqlar arqalı tolıǵıraq, keńrek sáwlelendiriw múmkinshiligine iye boladı. Durısında
da, shayır dúrkindi belgili bir maqsette ya formalıq ya mazmunlıq tárepten bir tutas sheńberge
