TRANSLATION CHALLENGES OF LIGHT INDUSTRY AND TEXTILE TERMINOLOGY IN ENGLISH AND KARAKALPAK LANGUAGES

Аннотация

The textile and light industry fields have their own intricate terminologies, which pose significant challenges when translated between linguistically distant languages such as English and Karakalpak. This article provides a detailed analysis of the linguistic, cultural, and industrial factors that influence the translation process, focusing on terminology commonly used in textile technology, materials, and production.

Тип источника: Конференции
Годы охвата с 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Выпуск:
50-53

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Поделиться
Sratdinova , G. . (2025). TRANSLATION CHALLENGES OF LIGHT INDUSTRY AND TEXTILE TERMINOLOGY IN ENGLISH AND KARAKALPAK LANGUAGES. Академические исследования в современной науке, 4(45), 50–53. извлечено от https://www.inlibrary.uz/index.php/arims/article/view/132534
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Аннотация

The textile and light industry fields have their own intricate terminologies, which pose significant challenges when translated between linguistically distant languages such as English and Karakalpak. This article provides a detailed analysis of the linguistic, cultural, and industrial factors that influence the translation process, focusing on terminology commonly used in textile technology, materials, and production.


background image

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

50

TRANSLATION CHALLENGES OF LIGHT INDUSTRY AND TEXTILE

TERMINOLOGY IN ENGLISH AND KARAKALPAK LANGUAGES

Sratdinova Gulbakhar Bakhtiyarovna

Assistant-teacher of Karakalpak State University

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16741632

Abstract

. The textile and light industry fields have their own intricate

terminologies, which pose significant challenges when translated between
linguistically distant languages such as English and Karakalpak. This article
provides a detailed analysis of the linguistic, cultural, and industrial factors that
influence the translation process, focusing on terminology commonly used in
textile technology, materials, and production.

Keywords

: Textile terminology, Karakalpak language, industrial

translation, light industry, English, linguistic adaptation, technical vocabulary,
cultural equivalence

Introduction

. The textile industry is one of the oldest yet most globally

evolving sectors, and with the spread of international trade, translating textile-
related terminology becomes a crucial task. Karakalpakstan, though a region
with its own textile traditions, is experiencing increased exposure to modern
industrial textile processes and materials. Hence, the necessity for accurate
translation from English into Karakalpak is growing. However, due to linguistic
disparities, cultural incongruities, and the novelty of many terms, the process is
not straightforward. Words in English often carry connotations, industrial
standards, or historical contexts that have no direct counterparts in the
Karakalpak language. This article aims to systematically explore these
challenges and recommend feasible strategies.

To begin with, a major issue lies in the asymmetry of vocabulary. English, as

a global lingua franca, has a vast and continuously evolving lexicon of textile-
related terms, many of which are neologisms or brand-specific compounds. In
contrast, the Karakalpak lexicon is still developing in this field, leading to several
key problems:

Lack of Established Equivalents
For example, terms like:
"Spandex" – a synthetic fiber known for elasticity,
"Sericulture" – the production of silk,
"Lycra" – a trademarked name for a type of elastic fiber,
have no native equivalents in Karakalpak. In such cases, translators often

face the choice of either borrowing the word (e.g., spandeks) or creating a
descriptive phrase (e.g., sozılmalı sintetikalıq jip). However, descriptive phrases


background image

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

51

can result in overly technical or unnatural constructions, which may hinder
comprehension, especially for general audiences.

Many English textile terms are polysemous, meaning they have multiple

meanings depending on context. Take the word "finish": In general use, it means
to complete something. In textiles, "fabric finish" refers to a process applied to
enhance texture or durability. If translated simply as «juwmaqlaw» (to finish),
the technical nuance is lost. It must be contextually adapted to something like
«material jùzesin tegislew processi» (the process of surface treatment) [6, 1-28].

Beyond semantics, grammatical structure creates another layer of difficulty.

English tends to use compact noun compounds, such as:

"moisture-wicking material",
"colorfast synthetic fibers",
"non-shrink wool blend".
These are difficult to directly translate into Karakalpak due to its

agglutinative morphology, which prefers analytic expressions. The result is
longer, more complex phrases like:

"ıǵallıqtı shıǵarıwshı material,"
"reńli sintetikalıq talshıqlar,"
"Keltermeytuģın jún aralaspası."
While these translations are technically accurate, they may sound

cumbersome and reduce readability, especially in marketing or instructional
materials.

Another significant issue in translation arises from cultural and industrial

mismatches between English-speaking countries and Karakalpakstan.

Karakalpak textile heritage includes elements such as:
Kórpeshe tigiw (quilting and padding),
Jip iyiriw (traditional yarn making),
Sawkele bezew (headdress decoration), [5].
which have no functional counterparts in industrial English terminology.

Similarly, English terms like "digital textile printing," "technical textiles," or
"nanofibers" often do not correspond to any existing cultural concept in
Karakalpak. This leads to a conceptual translation gap where words must be
explained rather than translated.

Karakalpakstan is in a developmental stage regarding modern textile

manufacturing. Many processes and materials are imported, and so are the
terms. Without institutional standardization or formal training in industrial


background image

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

52

translation, these terms often appear inconsistently in texts, sometimes in
Russian, Uzbek, or a mix of transliterations.

To address these multifaceted challenges, a combination of strategies is

needed. Below are several practical recommendations:

Using loanwords with descriptive qualifiers can help balance clarity and

authenticity. Example: "Acrylic yarn" → akril jip (zamanagóy sintetika)

Educational institutions and textile industry stakeholders should

collaborate to create bilingual or trilingual glossaries (English–Karakalpak–
Uzbek). These would:

Provide standardized equivalents,

Explain unfamiliar terms,

Reduce confusion in educational materials and product labeling [1, 3-25].

Training translators in technical fields is essential. Workshops and short-

term courses focusing on industrial terminology, textile production processes,
and cultural adaptation would significantly improve translation quality.

In instructional or promotional contexts, adding visual diagrams, process

illustrations, and usage examples can complement translation, especially for
terms with no equivalents.

English Term

Karakalpak Translation

Translation Note

Synthetic fiber

Sintetikalıq jip

Commonly

borrowed;

understandable

across Turkic

languages

Fabric finishing

material jùzesin tegislew

processi

Needs contextual

clarification

Embroidery thread

Naģıslap tigiw jibi

Traditional term;

close to cultural

context

Flame-retardant

textile

Órtke shıdamlı material

New concept;

requires technical

awareness


background image

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

53

Textile printing

technique

Materialģa basıp

shıģarıw usılı

May need visual

clarification in

educational settings

Conclusion

. In conclusion, the translation of textile and light industry

terms between English and Karakalpak is not merely a linguistic task but a
socio-cultural and industrial endeavor. It requires sensitivity to linguistic form,
awareness of industrial processes, and adaptation to the cultural reality of the
target audience. While Karakalpak is rich in traditional textile lexicon, modern
technical vocabulary is still evolving.

References:

1. Alguliyev, R., & Mahmudov, R. (2018). Language industry: opportunities,
perspectives and problems. Problems of Information society, 9(1), 3-25.
2. Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation. Routledge.
3. Bowker, L., & Pearson, J. (2002). Working with specialized language: A
practical guide to using corpora. Routledge.
4. Berdimuratov. E “Qaraqalpaq tili terminleri” Nókis. 1999
5. Berdimuratov. E – “Qaraqalpaq tili terminologiyası” 1989
6. Granger, S., & Lefer, M. A. (2023). Learner translation corpora: Bridging the
gap between learner corpus research and corpus-based translation studies.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 9(1), 1-28.
7. Qaraqalpaq tilinin' lingvistikali'q terminologiyasi' No'kis, 1984.
8. Ziyamukhammedov, J. T., & Mustafaeva, S. T. (2023). Current problems in the
unification of Chinese linguistic terms, the translation of industry terms into
other languages, and the issue of their regulation. Journal of Law and Sustainable
Development, 11(12), e2514-e2514..

Библиографические ссылки

Alguliyev, R., & Mahmudov, R. (2018). Language industry: opportunities, perspectives and problems. Problems of Information society, 9(1), 3-25.

Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation. Routledge.

Bowker, L., & Pearson, J. (2002). Working with specialized language: A practical guide to using corpora. Routledge.

Berdimuratov. E “Qaraqalpaq tili terminleri” Nókis. 1999

Berdimuratov. E – “Qaraqalpaq tili terminologiyası” 1989

Granger, S., & Lefer, M. A. (2023). Learner translation corpora: Bridging the gap between learner corpus research and corpus-based translation studies. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 9(1), 1-28.

Qaraqalpaq tilinin' lingvistikali'q terminologiyasi' No'kis, 1984.

Ziyamukhammedov, J. T., & Mustafaeva, S. T. (2023). Current problems in the unification of Chinese linguistic terms, the translation of industry terms into other languages, and the issue of their regulation. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12), e2514-e2514..