THE TREATMENT OF TRANSACTIONAL ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE

A’zam  Qambarov

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

79

THE TREATMENT OF TRANSACTIONAL ISSUES IN

CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE

Qambarov A’zam Muxammadali o‘g‘li

International Islamic academy of Uzbekistan

Senior teacher of social sciences and law chair

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15574331

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of how transactional

(muʿāmalāt) issues are addressed in contemporary Islamic jurisprudence. The
study examines how traditional Islamic legal principles are interpreted and
applied in the context of globalization and modern economic reforms. Particular
focus is given to the concept of murābaḥah contracts, which are widely used in
Islamic finance. The paper investigates legal complexities arising in Western
legal systems when adjudicating Islamic financial transactions, exemplified by
the case of Islamic Investment Company of the Gulf Ltd. v. Symphony Gems N.V.

The author explores the historical development of Islamic jurisprudence

and its regional variations, analyzing how these differences impact the
formulation and execution of modern contractual obligations. The article also
sheds light on recent reforms in family law in countries like Egypt and the
ongoing tension between secular legal systems and Sharia-based approaches,
raising broader questions about legal pluralism and cultural integration.

Moreover, the article addresses critical challenges in applying Islamic legal

ethics to modern financial instruments, including the role of artificial
intelligence, regulatory frameworks, and the fatwa-issuing process. The
discussion emphasizes the need for adaptive legal models and ethical structures
to ensure that Islamic financial institutions remain competitive and compliant in
the global market.

In conclusion, the research not only highlights pressing legal and ethical

challenges but also proposes practical solutions for harmonizing Islamic legal
principles with modern financial realities.

Keywords:

Islamic jurisprudence, Muʿāmalāt (transactions), Murābaḥah

contracts, Islamic finance, western legal systems, Sharia and globalization

Introduction

The dynamic landscape of contemporary Islamic jurisprudence reflects a

complex interplay between traditional legal principles and modern transactional
practices. As globalization reshapes economic interactions, the need for a
nuanced understanding of Islamic financial transactions becomes ever more
critical. This evolving context necessitates an exploration of how classical

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

80

Islamic law responds to contemporary commercial realities, particularly in areas
such as murabahah contracts, which blur the lines between Islamic finance and
conventional methods. The legal discourse surrounding these transactions is not
merely an academic exercise; it also reflects broader societal debates about
identity and cultural heritage. For example, the discourse on family law in Egypt
illustrates the tensions between Islamic identity and secular governance,
revealing the profound implications of legal transformations ((Abu-Odeh et al.)).
Similarly, cases like Islamic Investment Company of the Gulf (Bahamas) Ltd. v.
Symphony Gems N.V. highlight the challenges faced by Islamic finance within
Western legal frameworks, emphasizing the need for effective integration of
these two worlds ((Esq A. et al.)).

Within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence, transactional issues

encompass the various rules and principles that govern economic interactions
and contracts among individuals. These transactions are deeply rooted in ethical
considerations derived from Islamic teachings, which emphasize fairness,
transparency, and justice. The complexities of these transactional issues are
observed when traditional Islamic concepts collide with contemporary financial
practices, leading to significant debates on the legitimacy and applicability of
various financial instruments. For instance, the case of Islamic Investment
Company of the Gulf (Bahamas) Ltd. v. Symphony Gems N.V. highlights the
tensions between Islamic financial contracts, such as murabahah, and the
prevailing Western legal frameworks, demonstrating how Islamic finance
navigates a unique set of challenges within a predominantly secular legal
landscape (Esq A. et al.). Furthermore, the ongoing discourse surrounding
identity in legal reform, particularly in contexts like Egypt, reflects how
transactional issues are also intertwined with broader societal values and
cultural identity (Abu-Odeh et al.).

In the realm of Islamic jurisprudence, the study of contemporary

applications is vital for understanding how traditional principles adapt to
modern societal needs. This adaptation is particularly relevant when addressing
transactional issues, where the intersection of cultural identity and legal
frameworks reveals much about a societys values and priorities. For instance,
the ongoing debate over family law reform in Egypt exemplifies this dynamic; it
highlights how discussions on gender roles and familial structures are
intertwined with the broader discourse on the Egyptian legal identity. As
stridently noted, these legal transformations raise questions about whether to
reconstruct the law to restore its Islamic character or to maintain a European,

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

81

secular approach (Abu-Odeh et al.). Such inquiries into contemporary
applications not only illuminate the evolving nature of Islamic law but also
underscore the necessity of integrating modern challenges into traditional
jurisprudence (Abu-Odeh et al.). Therefore, studying these contemporary
applications is essential for fostering a comprehensive understanding of Islamic
legal practices today.

In addressing the treatment of transactional issues within contemporary

Islamic jurisprudence, the essay is structured to facilitate a comprehensive
understanding of both historical and current contexts. The initial sections
provide a foundational overview of Islamic law, elucidating key concepts and
principles that govern financial transactions. Subsequently, the discussion
transitions to a critical analysis of specific case studies, such as the Symphony
Gems case, which exemplifies the complexities arising from the intersection of
Islamic finance and Western legal systems (Esq A. et al.). Furthermore, the essay
explores various reform debates, particularly the dynamic surrounding family
law in Egypt, highlighting how identity and cultural context influence legal
interpretations and decisions (Abu-Odeh et al.). This structure not only
emphasizes the intricate relationship between legal frameworks and cultural
identity but also showcases the practical implications of these transactions
within global markets, thereby enriching the discourse on Islamic jurisprudence.

The evolution of Islamic jurisprudence is deeply rooted in a complex

historical context, shaped by cultural, legal, and political influences over
centuries. As Islamic law (Sharia) developed, jurists faced significant challenges
in reconciling traditional principles with contemporary societal needs, especially
regarding transactional issues. The debates surrounding family law reform in
Egypt during the twentieth century exemplify this struggle, where jurists
grappled with defining the identity of the legal system, questioning whether it
should retain its Islamic foundations or adopt a secular, European model (Abu-
Odeh et al.). Moreover, the works of prominent scholars, such as Imam al-Shafii,
highlighted the humanitarian values embedded within Islamic law, revealing a
nuanced understanding of womens rights and the broader social implications of
legal rulings (Nur et al.). Thus, the historical context of Islamic jurisprudence
reveals a dynamic interplay between heritage and modernity, informing the
treatment of transactional issues in contemporary practice.

The evolution of transactional laws in classical Islamic texts reflects a

dynamic interplay between jurisprudential principles and the socio-economic
contexts of the time. Early Islamic jurisprudence established foundational

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

82

concepts such as riba (usury) and gharar (excessive uncertainty), which
governed transactional ethics and sought to ensure fairness and social justice in
commerce. As trade expanded and diversified, scholars adapted classical texts to
address new financial instruments and practices, illustrating a pragmatic
approach to economic reality. For instance, the murabahah contract emerged as
a significant financial mechanism, demonstrating a shift towards transactional
arrangements that resemble contemporary financing methods, yet remain
grounded in Islamic principles. This adaptability raises critical questions
regarding the identity of the Islamic legal framework within modern contexts,
particularly as contemporary practices often evoke tensions between traditional
interpretations and present-day commercial realities, as explored in legal cases
like the Symphony Gems matter, which exemplifies these challenges in
integrating Islamic finance within Western legal paradigms (Esq A. et al.). The
broader discourse on family law in Egypt further exemplifies this struggle, as
legal reform debates reflect conflicting ideologies surrounding the nature of
Islamic identity in the contemporary legal system (Abu-Odeh et al.).

Within the realm of contemporary Islamic jurisprudence, several key

scholars have significantly advanced the discourse on transactional issues,
particularly in relation to Islamic finance. Their contributions elucidate the
complexities of adhering to Sharia principles while simultaneously navigating
modern financial systems. For instance, the scholarship surrounding sukuk—
Islamic financial certificates—has gained traction, particularly as it pertains to
their legal structuring in non-Islamic jurisdictions. This area of study not only
addresses legal challenges but also explores the integration of asset-backed
sukuk offerings, highlighting the necessity for innovative financial products that
comply with Islamic law. As noted, scholars stress the importance of prudent
risk management and regulatory compliance that honor Islamic tenets while
fostering economic development (Dahlia et al.). Furthermore, the evolving
marketplace for sukuk investments underscores the interdisciplinary
approaches required to navigate legal frameworks in global finance (McMillen et
al.). Such scholarly insights are vital for bridging traditional jurisprudence with
contemporary transactional practices.

Understanding the contemporary interpretations of transactional issues in

Islamic jurisprudence necessitates a critical evaluation of their historical
context. The evolution of legal frameworks within Islamic societies has often
been influenced by broader socio-political dynamics and cultural identity
debates, which continue to shape modern applications. For instance, the

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

83

discussions surrounding family law reform in Egypt highlight the intricate
relationship between legal identity and cultural expression. As noted, it is crucial
to relate the debate on family law with another debate, one revolving around the
identity of the Egyptian legal system, where the struggle for identity invokes
essential questions regarding whether Egyptian law should reflect Islamic
principles or maintain a European and secular stance (Abu-Odeh et al.). This
clash not only underscores the complexities inherent in contemporary
interpretations but also illustrates how historical contexts can profoundly
influence current legal practices and social norms within Islamic jurisprudence
(Abu-Odeh et al.)

The integration of Islamic financial principles within the global marketplace

poses significant challenges in transactional issues, particularly as it navigates
the prevailing Anglo-American legal frameworks. A pivotal case illustrating
these tensions is the Islamic Investment Company of the Gulf (Bahamas) Ltd. v.
Symphony Gems N.V., which marks the first instance of a Western court
evaluating an Islamic financial transaction. This case underlines the difficulties
inherent in aligning Islamic contracts, such as murabahah, with conventional
finance systems that often critique these arrangements as convoluted and
inefficient (Esq A. et al.). Furthermore, the ongoing discourse surrounding the
identity of legal frameworks in Egypt highlights the complexities of reconciling
modern applications of Islamic law with the historical and cultural narratives of
legal identity (Abu-Odeh et al.). Ultimately, these contemporary challenges
necessitate a careful reevaluation of how Islamic jurisprudence can be adapted
to function effectively within diverse legal contexts.

Globalization has profoundly influenced Islamic finance, catalyzing both

opportunities and challenges in the context of contemporary transactional
jurisprudence. The integration of Islamic finance within the global economic
system has prompted the need for greater compliance with international
standards, compelling Islamic financial institutions to balance Shariah
adherence with economic competitiveness. This dynamic has introduced
complexity in ensuring that financial products not only align with Islamic
principles but also meet the rigorous demands of a global market. As noted in
discussions of Maqashid Shariah, leadership in Islamic finance must navigate
these transformations while upholding essential values such as equity and
morality (Arifin et al.). Furthermore, debates surrounding the identity of legal
frameworks, particularly in regions like Egypt, highlight the tension between
maintaining Islamic legal principles and succumbing to secular influences,

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

84

emphasizing that the globalization of finance can shape not only economic
practices but also underlying cultural identities (Abu-Odeh et al.).

The realm of modern transactions presents a myriad of ethical dilemmas,

particularly within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence, which emphasizes
moral integrity and fairness. Issues such as interest (riba), ambiguous contracts,
and the increasingly common practice of hedging provoke critical ethical
concerns among practitioners. The concept of syirkah, for example, is frequently
examined in this context, highlighting Imam Maliks perspective on partnerships
and their ethical implications for asset management (Awaluddin et al.).
Furthermore, the necessity for a comparative methodology in Islamic
jurisprudence becomes increasingly apparent as it allows scholars to navigate
the complexities of contemporary financial practices while maintaining
adherence to core Islamic principles (Osman et al.). Engaging with these ethical
dilemmas not only encourages deeper understanding among jurists but also
fosters a more harmonized approach to contemporary issues, thereby
reinforcing the relevance of Islamic law in todays dynamic economic landscape.

In contemporary Islamic jurisprudence, technology plays a pivotal role in

reshaping transactional practices, particularly through the adoption of
innovative financial instruments that align with Islamic principles. The
murabahah contract, for instance, exemplifies how technology influences
modern financing mechanisms, as it closely resembles conventional practices
while adhering to Islamic legal frameworks (Esq A. et al.). By incorporating
advancements such as blockchain, Islamic finance can further evolve, enhancing
transparency and efficiency in waqf contributions while shifting traditional
concepts toward a more business-oriented culture (Megat A et al.). These
technological advancements not only facilitate smoother transactions but also
ensure compliance with Shariah principles, addressing concerns over
conventional banking methods. As technological capabilities expand, they
present both opportunities and challenges for integrating Islamic financial
practices into a global economy dominated by different regulatory
environments, underscoring the need for continued adaptation and innovation
in transactional methodologies.

The exploration of case studies related to transactional issues in

contemporary Islamic jurisprudence reveals significant complexities shaped by
cultural, legal, and social dimensions. One prominent area of concern is the
intersection of family law reforms and cultural identity in Egypt, where debates
about legal legitimacy challenge traditional notions of jurisprudence. As

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

85

highlighted in the discourse, the contention over familial structures not only
addresses gender issues but also raises questions about the legal systems
Islamic authenticity, reflecting broader societal struggles (Abu-Odeh et al.).
Additionally, the nuances of real estate transactions illustrate the critical role of
formal documentation in Islamic legal practices. Article 22 of the Registration
Law emphasizes the necessity of official recognition to confirm property
ownership, wherein unregistered agreements lead to disputes in courts
(Hasankhani et al.). Such case studies underscore the ongoing negotiation
between modernity and tradition within the evolving landscape of Islamic law.

The intersection of Islamic banking practices and Sharia compliance is

marked by complexities that arise from the interpretations and applications of
Islamic jurisprudence. A critical issue within this realm is the phenomenon of
Fatwa shopping, where bank managers seek favorable Sharia opinions to
sanction practices that may not fully adhere to Islamic law. This approach often
leads to a divergence of objectives between Sharia Board Members and bank
managers, as highlighted in existing studies. Such discrepancies jeopardize
Sharia compliance, resulting in products that are deemed non-compliant,
ultimately undermining the integrity of Islamic banking systems (Hassan et al.).
Furthermore, the literature suggests that Islamic financial institutions aim to
eliminate economic injustices through adherence to religious guidelines
governing transactions, emphasizing the necessity for aligning practices with
principles of Mu’amalat (Hassan A et al.). Therefore, addressing these challenges
is essential for ensuring that Islamic banking robustly reflects the ethical
foundations of Sharia law.

In contemporary settings, the examination of contracts and agreements is

increasingly complex due to the intersection of legal frameworks and cultural
contexts, particularly within the domain of co-religionist commerce. Such
transactions, which aim to fulfill both commercial and spiritual objectives,
require a robust legal foundation to ensure that the rights of parties involved are
protected ((Helfand et al.)). However, current legal trends pose challenges to
enforcing these agreements in courts, where legal doctrines discourage
contextual interpretations that respect the intentions of the parties. The
phenomenon of New Formalism and the effects of Establishment Clause Creep
further hinder the ability of courts to navigate the nuanced landscape of
religiously framed contracts, compromising the viability of co-religionist
commerce ((Fleetwood et al.)). Thus, revitalizing contextual tools within legal

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

86

interpretations is essential to uphold the integrity of contracts in this evolving
terrain, balancing commercial objectives with respect for personal faith.

In the realm of Islamic jurisprudence, dispute resolution mechanisms play a

critical role in addressing transactional issues, emdiving principles of fairness
and justice. Traditional methods, such as mediation (sulh) and arbitration
(tahkim), encourage parties to engage amicably while adhering to Islamic ethical
standards. The evolution of these mechanisms has also been influenced by
contemporary practices in Islamic finance, including innovative models like
Commodity Murābahah, which illustrate the practical operations of dispute
resolution within financial transactions (Mahadi et al.). Furthermore, as Islamic
financial institutions expand globally, the necessity for harmonized regulatory
frameworks becomes increasingly apparent. These frameworks are essential for
mitigating risks associated with Islamic financial intermediation and ensuring
compliance with Shariah principles (Dahlia et al.). Consequently, the integration
of effective dispute resolution mechanisms ensures not only the legitimacy of
transactions but also the overall integrity of Islamic finance within the
contemporary economic landscape.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the treatment of transactional issues in contemporary Islamic

jurisprudence highlights the intricate balance between religious principles and
the demands of modern financial practices. The growing complexity of Islamic
financial transactions, as illustrated by cases like the Islamic Investment
Company of the Gulf (Bahamas) Ltd. v. Symphony Gems N.V., underscores the
challenges of reconciling traditional Islamic concepts with the Western legal
framework that dominates global commerce. Such cases reveal a tendency for
Islamic contracts to adapt closely to conventional mechanisms, which can lead to
deviations from their classical forms, as noted in (Esq A. et al.). Moreover, the
rise of co-religionist commerce in the United States emphasizes the need for
legal structures that support these unique transactions while respecting
religious contexts, as discussed in (Helfand et al.). Ultimately, fostering an
environment in which Islamic finance can thrive while upholding its core tenets
remains essential for the future of the discipline.

In examining contemporary Islamic jurisprudence, a critical analysis

reveals several key findings regarding the treatment of transactional issues.
Research indicates that Islamic banking transactions in South Africa,
encompassing products like mudaraba and murabaha, reflect specific Shariah
requirements integrated into contractual structures by various banks. However,

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

87

it has been found that the economic realities of these transactions often parallel
conventional banking, leading to inconsistencies in accounting practices
governed by IFRS. The study asserts that while Islamic financial institutions
account for transactions within IFRS frameworks, a significant dissonance
remains between these accounting standards and the inherent Shariah
principles of the contracts ((Kholvadia et al.)). Additionally, a broader literature
survey on Islamic ethics demonstrates that Google can serve as an equally
reliable resource for research in Islamic banking, paralleled with traditional
repositories like JSTOR, highlighting the evolving nature of accessible knowledge
within this domain ((Lewis et al.)).

The future of transactional issues in Islamic jurisprudence is intricately tied

to the evolving nature of societal norms and legal frameworks within Islamic
contexts. As contemporary issues such as real estate transactions take center
stage, there is a pressing need for adaptations in Islamic legal interpretations to
align with modern economic realities. For instance, issues that arise from
informal real estate transactions illustrate the tension between traditional
juristic principles and current practices, emphasizing the necessity for a legal
framework that recognizes both the sanctity of contracts and the practicalities of
enforcement, as noted in Article 22 of the Registration Law: The government
will recognize only the person in whose name the property is registered.
Furthermore, the ongoing debates regarding the identity of legal systems,
reflecting the contest over preserving Islamic authenticity versus embracing
secular influences, play a critical role in shaping future transactional
jurisprudence. This dynamic underscores the importance of creating a flexible
yet robust legal approach that harmonizes tradition with the demands of
contemporary society, as highlighted in (Abu-Odeh et al.). The commitment to
upholding contractual obligations is not only a legal expectation but also a moral
imperative deeply rooted in Islamic teachings, thus ensuring that future
developments in transactional issues remain relevant and contextually
appropriate, as reiterated in (Hasankhani et al.).

The contemporary landscape of Islamic jurisprudence necessitates ongoing

research and adaptation, particularly in addressing transactional issues that
arise in an increasingly complex economic environment. As businesses evolve
and new financial instruments emerge, jurisprudential frameworks must be
responsive and adaptable to maintain relevance and efficacy. The research
highlighted in various studies illustrates how concepts rooted in Islamic ethics,
such as those explored through the lens of Ad Dunya wa Ad Din, offer insightful

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

88

guidance for integrating ethical business practices into modern
entrepreneurship (DIDIT et al.). Moreover, following the global financial crises,
there is a pressing need to revisit and repurpose Shari’a financial principles,
which possess untapped potential to provide ethical alternatives amid rampant
speculation and risk-laden transactions (Reda et al.). Thus, continuous scholarly
engagement is indispensable for reformulating rules and interpretations that
align Islamic law with contemporary transactional realities, ensuring both
justice and economic stability.

References:

1.

Abu-Odeh, Lama. "Egyptian Feminism: Trapped in the Identity Debate"

Scholarship

@

GEORGETOWN

LAW,

2004,

doi:

https://core.ac.uk/download/70375513.pdf
2.

Ahmed Esq., Arshad A., Moghul Esq., Umar F.. "Contractual Forms in

Islamic Finance Law and Islamic Inv. Co. of the Gulf (Bahamas) Ltd. v. Symphony
Gems N.V. & Ors.: A First Impression of Islamic Finance" FLASH: The Fordham
Law

THE TREATMENT OF TRANSACTIONAL ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE

Abstract

Downloads

Keywords:

Abstract

References