THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR PREPARING FUTURE PEDAGOGUES

Abstract

This article describes the crucial importance of the International Assessment System (IAS) in molding the training of prospective educators. Acknowledging the changing demands of the global educational landscape, the research seeks to unveil the pivotal role that the IAS plays in guiding teacher preparation programs worldwide. The article examines how involvement with this assessment framework contributes to the cultivation of competent and globally-aware educators. The paper deals with primary objectives include scrutinizing the alignment of teacher preparation programs with international assessment standards, identifying perceived benefits and challenges associated with IAS integration, and proposing recommendations to optimize the preparation of future educators within this global framework.

American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
HAC
doi
 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Ruslanbek Sarsenovich Rajapov. (2024). THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR PREPARING FUTURE PEDAGOGUES. American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 4(10), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume04Issue10-17
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

This article describes the crucial importance of the International Assessment System (IAS) in molding the training of prospective educators. Acknowledging the changing demands of the global educational landscape, the research seeks to unveil the pivotal role that the IAS plays in guiding teacher preparation programs worldwide. The article examines how involvement with this assessment framework contributes to the cultivation of competent and globally-aware educators. The paper deals with primary objectives include scrutinizing the alignment of teacher preparation programs with international assessment standards, identifying perceived benefits and challenges associated with IAS integration, and proposing recommendations to optimize the preparation of future educators within this global framework.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

232


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

This article describes the crucial importance of the International Assessment System (IAS) in molding the training of

prospective educators. Acknowledging the changing demands of the global educational landscape, the research seeks

to unveil the pivotal role that the IAS plays in guiding teacher preparation programs worldwide. The article examines

how involvement with this assessment framework contributes to the cultivation of competent and globally-aware

educators. The paper deals with primary objectives include scrutinizing the alignment of teacher preparation

programs with international assessment standards, identifying perceived benefits and challenges associated with IAS

integration, and proposing recommendations to optimize the preparation of future educators within this global

framework.

KEYWORDS

Importance, the International Assessment System (IAS), preparation, programs, educators, evaluation, system, global

standardization.

INTRODUCTION

The International Assessment System (IAS) plays a

pivotal role in shaping the preparation of future

pedagogues, carrying substantial importance in the

following aspects:

Research Article

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR
PREPARING FUTURE PEDAGOGUES

Submission Date:

October 08, 2024,

Accepted Date:

October 13, 2024,

Published Date:

October 18, 2024

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume04Issue10-17


Ruslanbek Sarsenovich Rajapov

Nukus State Pedagogical Institute, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajsshr

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

233


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Global Competence Development: The IAS ensures

that future pedagogues are equipped with a global

perspective and the necessary skills to navigate diverse

educational landscapes. This global competence is

increasingly vital as educators engage with students

from varied cultural backgrounds and prepare them for

an interconnected world.

Quality Assurance in Teacher Training: By establishing

international standards and benchmarks, the IAS

contributes to the quality assurance of teacher training

programs. It sets a framework for assessing the

effectiveness of pedagogical approaches, technology

integration, and cross-cultural competencies, thereby

elevating the overall quality of teacher education.

Alignment with Evolving Educational Needs: The IAS

encourages the adaptation of teacher training

programs to meet the evolving needs of education. It

prompts educators to stay abreast of emerging

teaching methodologies, technological advancements,

and global educational trends, ensuring that future

pedagogues are well-prepared for the challenges of

the modern educational landscape.

Enhanced

Professional

Development:

Future

pedagogues benefit from the IAS by having access to

continuous professional development opportunities

that align with international standards. This not only

fosters their individual growth but also contributes to

the advancement of the teaching profession on a

global scale.

Global Collaboration and Knowledge Exchange: The

IAS promotes international collaboration among

educators and institutions, facilitating the exchange of

best practices. This collaborative approach allows

future pedagogues to learn from successful models

implemented in different parts of the world, enriching

their understanding and repertoire of effective

teaching strategies.

Increased Mobility and Recognition: Teachers

prepared under the IAS framework gain enhanced

mobility and recognition internationally. Their

qualifications are more readily understood and

accepted across borders, fostering a global community

of educators and promoting the internationalization of

education.

Preparation for Cross-Cultural Teaching Environments:

As education becomes increasingly diverse, the IAS

ensures that future pedagogues are adequately

prepared to teach in cross-cultural environments. This

preparation goes beyond academic knowledge,

encompassing an understanding of diverse learning

styles, cultural nuances, and effective communication

strategies.

Thus, the International Assessment System plays a

crucial role in shaping the preparation of future

pedagogues by providing a standardized framework,


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

234


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

fostering global competence, ensuring quality in

teacher training, and promoting collaboration and

adaptability in response to evolving educational needs.

It is a key driver in elevating the standards of teacher

education on a global scale.

LITERATURE REVIEW

According to some researchers who studied this

problem, efforts to prepare prospective educators for

the international assessment system through

technology-based

approaches

have

produced

favorable outcomes. Learning from the experiences of

other nations allows for a more comprehensive

preparation of future educators, ultimately elevating

the global standard of education [2]. International

evaluation

initiatives

encompass

standardized

assessments

designed

to

gauge

students'

performance across various nations. These programs

seek to assess students' proficiency and abilities in

diverse subjects such as mathematics, science, reading,

and writing. Prominent examples of international

assessment programs include the Program for

International Student Assessment (PISA), Trends in

International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS),

and the International Progress in Reading Literacy

Study (PIRLS) [1].

It is imperative to underscore the significance of

enhancing teacher competencies in alignment with

international assessment program standards. The

quality of education within a country is directly

contingent on the qualifications and capabilities of its

educators. The development of teacher competencies

that conform to the standards of international

assessment programs holds paramount importance

for

several

compelling

reasons.

The

internationalization of education has led to an

increased emphasis on preparing future pedagogues

to

meet

global

educational

standards

and

expectations. The significance of the International

Assessment System (IAS) in this context is crucial, as it

serves as a framework for evaluating and

benchmarking

educational

practices

on

an

international scale. This literature review explores the

importance of the IAS in the preparation of future

pedagogues, examining its impact on curriculum

development, teacher training, and the overall quality

of education.

Globalization and Education: The intersection of

globalization and education has necessitated a shift

towards preparing educators who are not only well-

versed in local educational practices but also capable

of navigating the globalized landscape. The IAS plays a

pivotal role in aligning educational goals with global

standards, ensuring that future pedagogues are

equipped to contribute to the internationalization of

education [7].

Quality Assurance and Accountability: The IAS serves

as a quality assurance mechanism by providing a


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

235


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

standardized framework for evaluating educational

systems and institutions. This contributes to increased

accountability in teacher preparation programs,

ensuring that they meet rigorous international

benchmarks [8].

Curriculum Development and Alignment: A critical

aspect of preparing future pedagogues involves

developing curricula that align with international

educational standards. The IAS provides a guideline for

curriculum development, fostering the integration of

global perspectives, cross-cultural competencies, and

relevant pedagogical approaches [4].

Teacher Training and Professional Development:

Effective teacher preparation programs acknowledge

the significance of the IAS in shaping pedagogical

practices. Training future educators to understand and

navigate

international

assessment

frameworks

enhances their capacity to deliver high-quality

education that is globally competitive [6].

Impact on Student Learning Outcomes: The alignment

of teacher preparation with the IAS has been linked to

positive outcomes in student learning. Educators

trained under international assessment standards are

better equipped to implement effective teaching

strategies, resulting in improved student performance

and achievement [5].

Cultural Sensitivity and Inclusivity: The IAS encourages

the development of culturally sensitive educational

practices. Future pedagogues prepared under this

system are more likely to embrace diversity, foster

inclusivity, and integrate global perspectives into their

teaching methodologies [3].

Challenges and Critiques: While the IAS offers

substantial benefits, it is not without challenges. Critics

argue that a one-size-fits-all approach may not

consider the unique cultural contexts and needs of

individual regions, potentially leading to a loss of local

identity in education [9].

METHODOLOGY

The teaching methodology outlined here aims to

prepare future pedagogues for the International

Assessment System (IAS). Recognizing the increasing

importance of global educational standards, this

approach integrates both theoretical understanding

and practical applications to equip educators with the

skills required to navigate and contribute to the

international assessment landscape.

1. Understanding the International Assessment System

(IAS): Provide a comprehensive overview of the IAS,

including its objectives, frameworks, and global impact

on educational practices. Explore international

assessment models, such as PISA, TIMSS, and other

benchmarking

systems,

to

familiarize

future

pedagogues with diverse approaches.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

236


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

2.

Technological

Competence

Development:

Emphasize the role of technology in the IAS and train

future educators in the use of assessment

technologies. Integrate hands-on sessions with digital

tools used in international assessments to enhance

technological competence [11].

3.

Cross-Cultural

Competence:

Inculcate

an

understanding of diverse cultural contexts and their

influence on assessment practices. Encourage

interactions with international educators, fostering

cross-cultural communication skills among future

pedagogues.

4. Curriculum Alignment with International Standards:

Guide future educators in aligning their teaching

strategies and curricula with international educational

standards. Explore resources like the Common

European Framework of Reference for Languages

(CEFR) or International Baccalaureate (IB) frameworks

for curriculum development [10].

5. Assessment Literacy: Develop assessment literacy by

covering topics such as formative and summative

assessment, validity, reliability, and fairness in

assessment [14]. Engage in practical exercises to

design assessments aligned with international

standards.

6. Continuous Professional Development (CPD):

Promote the importance of lifelong learning through

continuous professional development. Encourage

participation in online courses, webinars, and

conferences focused on international assessment

practices [12].

7. Research and Critical Analysis: Cultivate research

skills by engaging future pedagogues in critically

analyzing international assessment literature and

studies. Assign research projects exploring the impact

of international assessments on educational policies

and practices worldwide.

8. Collaborative Learning: Foster collaborative learning

environments where future pedagogues work

together on international assessment projects.

Encourage participation in international educational

networks for collaborative knowledge exchange [13].

9. International Collaboration and Exchange Programs:

Facilitate opportunities for international collaboration

through exchange programs or partnerships with

educational institutions in different countries. Expose

future educators to diverse teaching methodologies

and assessment practices from around the world.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The internationalization of education has prompted a

paradigm shift in the way future pedagogues are

prepared for their roles. A crucial aspect of this

transformation

is

the

incorporation

of

the

International Assessment System (IAS) into teacher

training programs. This discussion explores the


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

237


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

significance, challenges, and potential benefits

associated with integrating the IAS into the

preparation of future educators.

Significance of International Assessment in Teacher

Preparation: The incorporation of the IAS into teacher

preparation programs is of paramount importance in

addressing the global nature of education. As

highlighted by Darling-Hammond [4], international

assessments provide a common framework for

evaluating educational outcomes across borders,

allowing for a standardized measurement of teacher

effectiveness and student achievement. This ensures

that future pedagogues are equipped with the skills

and knowledge necessary to navigate the complexities

of a globally interconnected educational landscape.

Challenges in Implementing the International

Assessment System: While the adoption of the IAS

brings several benefits, its implementation is not

without challenges. One notable challenge is the need

for alignment with diverse cultural and contextual

factors. As Biesta [15] emphasizes, educational

assessments should consider the socio-cultural

contexts in which they are applied. Adapting the IAS to

diverse

educational

settings

requires

careful

consideration of cultural nuances and variations in

pedagogical approaches.

Moreover, the potential tension between standardized

assessments and individualized teaching methods

needs to be addressed. Scholars such as Popham [14]

caution against the overreliance on standardized

assessments, emphasizing the importance of

preserving the individualized and holistic aspects of

education. Striking a balance between global

standards and local flexibility is crucial in the successful

integration of the IAS into teacher preparation

programs.

Benefits and Potential Outcomes: The integration of

the IAS into teacher preparation programs hold several

potential benefits. Firstly, it provides a benchmark for

assessing the quality of teacher education across

different

countries,

facilitating

international

comparisons and the sharing of best practices [16].

Secondly, exposure to international assessment

practices prepares future pedagogues to navigate

diverse learning environments and fosters cross-

cultural competence [6].

Additionally, the IAS can contribute to the

development of a more globally competitive

workforce. As argued by Tucker [17], aligning teacher

preparation with international benchmarks enhances

the quality of education, ensuring that graduates are

well-prepared to meet the demands of a globalized job

market.

International assessment systems play a crucial role in

shaping the preparation of future pedagogues,

providing

a

framework

for

evaluating

and


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

238


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

standardizing educational practices globally. In this

comparative analysis, we will explore and contrast the

significance of international assessment systems in

preparing future educators, considering both the

advantages and challenges associated with their

implementation.

Advantages: Global Benchmarking: Positive Aspect:

International assessment systems provide a common

benchmark for evaluating the proficiency of future

pedagogues, ensuring that their skills align with global

educational standards. This global benchmarking

facilitates mobility, allowing educators to seamlessly

transition between countries and educational systems.

Challenge: However, a potential challenge lies in the

diversity of educational contexts across nations,

raising questions about the universality of benchmarks

and the cultural relevance of assessment criteria.

Quality Assurance: Positive Aspect: These systems

contribute to quality assurance by establishing

consistent standards for teacher preparation

programs worldwide. Future pedagogues trained

under such systems are likely to meet or exceed

minimum competency levels, fostering a high-quality

and standardized education. Challenge: The challenge

emerges in adapting these standardized assessments

to accommodate diverse cultural and contextual

factors, ensuring that they do not inadvertently

promote a one-size-fits-all approach to education.

Cross-Cultural

Competence:

Positive

Aspect:

International assessment systems emphasize the

development of cross-cultural competence among

future pedagogues. This prepares educators to

navigate diverse classrooms, fostering a global

perspective and ensuring that they can effectively

engage with students from different cultural

backgrounds. Challenge: The challenge lies in striking a

balance

between

promoting

cross-cultural

competence and respecting the unique cultural

nuances of individual regions. There is a risk of cultural

homogenization if not approached thoughtfully.

Professional Development Opportunities: Positive

Aspect: These systems create opportunities for

continuous professional development, encouraging

future pedagogues to stay abreast of global trends,

innovative

teaching

methods,

and

evolving

educational technologies. Challenge: The challenge is

ensuring that professional development opportunities

are accessible and tailored to address the specific

needs of educators in different regions, avoiding a one-

size-fits-all approach.

Challenges: Cultural Relevance: Challenge: One notable

challenge is ensuring the cultural relevance of

international assessment systems. Education is deeply

rooted in cultural contexts, and imposing standardized

assessments may overlook the diverse ways in which

learning is valued and expressed across different

societies.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

239


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Equity and Access: Challenge: There is a potential

challenge related to equity and access. Not all regions

have equal access to resources, technologies, or the

capacity to meet international standards. This can

exacerbate educational inequalities and hinder the

effective implementation of global assessment

systems.

Flexibility and Adaptability: Challenge: The need for

flexibility and adaptability poses a challenge.

Educational contexts vary widely, and a rigid

adherence to global standards may hinder innovation

and the ability to tailor teaching methods to local

needs.

Thus, the importance of international assessment

systems for preparing future pedagogues is evident in

their potential to establish global standards, ensure

quality

assurance,

and

foster

cross-cultural

competence [23, 24]. However, challenges related to

cultural relevance, equity, and flexibility highlight the

complexity of implementing such systems on a global

scale. Striking a balance between standardization and

adaptability is crucial to harness the benefits of

international assessment systems while respecting the

diversity inherent in education worldwide.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the significance of the International

Assessment System in preparing future pedagogues is

evident across various dimensions of education. From

influencing curriculum development to shaping

teacher training and impacting student outcomes, the

IAS plays a central role in fostering global competence

among educators. As the landscape of education

continues to evolve, understanding and embracing the

implications of the IAS are essential for developing

well-prepared, internationally competent pedagogues.

In conclusion, the integration of the International

Assessment System into teacher preparation is a

significant step towards ensuring the quality and

relevance of education on a global scale. While

challenges exist, careful consideration of cultural

contexts and a balanced approach to assessment

methods can pave the way for successful

implementation. Future research should focus on

refining the IAS to address diverse educational settings

and on evaluating its long-term impact on the

preparedness of future pedagogues for the challenges

of a globalized world.

REFERENCES

1.

Ormonbekova

G.

Development

of

the

competences of future teachers specified in the

standards of international assessment programs.

2023. pp. 48-50. Scientific and practical conference

of science and innovation. in-academy.uz;

https://in-

academy.uz/index.php/si/article/download/14341/9

982


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

240


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

2.

https://www.pedagoglar.uz/index.php/ped/article/

view/6750/4787

3.

Banks, J. A. (2009). Teaching strategies for ethnic

studies (8th ed.). Pearson.

4.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education

around the world: What can we learn from

international practice? European Journal of

Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309.

5.

Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2015). The

knowledge capital of nations: Education and the

economics of growth. MIT Press.

6.

Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of

induction and mentoring programs for beginning

teachers: A critical review of the research. Review

of Educational Research, 81(2), 201-233.

7.

Marginson, S. (2012). Global field and global

imagining: Bourdieu and worldwide higher

education. British Journal of Sociology of

Education, 33(6), 881-897.

8.

Schleicher, A. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus:

What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with

what they know. OECD Publishing.

9.

Torres, C. A. (2016). Globalizations and education:

Collected essays on class, race, gender, and the

state. Routledge.

10.

Bialystok, E. (2018). Educational implications of

bilingualism for language assessment. Applied

Linguistics, 39(1), 85-96.

11.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2013).

Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes

required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic

technology-enabled

learning.

Computers

&

Education, 64, 175-182.

12.

Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional

development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

13.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational

change. Routledge.

14.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for

teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into

Practice, 48(1), 4-11.

15.

Biesta, G. (2017). Education, measurement and the

professions: Reclaiming a space for democratic

professionality

in

education.

Educational

Philosophy and Theory, 49(14), 1384-1395.

16.

OECD. (2018). Teachers and school leaders as

valued professionals: Towards a vision of the

teaching profession. OECD Publishing.

17.

Tucker, M. (2011). Standing on the shoulders of

giants: An American agenda for education reform.

Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31(4), 343-361.

18.

Sarsenbaeva

Z.

CROSS-CULTURAL

INTERPRETATION OF SYMBOLS IN ENGLISH AND

UZBEK

LITERATURE

//Евразийский

журнал

технологий и инноваций. –

2023.

Т. 1. –

№. 10. –

С. 146

-149.

19.

Sarsenbaeva Z. J. Pedagogical possibilities for

improving linguocultural competence by means of

studying

proverbs

//Colloquium-journal.

Голопристанський

міськрайонний

центр


background image

Volume 04 Issue 10-2024

241


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

232-241

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

зайнятості= Голопристанский районный центр

занятости, 2021. –

№. 5

-2.

С. 22

-24.

20.

Sarsenbaeva Z. COMPARING LINGUISTIC DEVICES

IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK NON-REALISTIC WORKS

//Молодые ученые. –

2023.

Т. 1. –

№. 15. –

С. 32

-

34.

21.

Utebaev T., Sarsenbaeva Z. Sprachliche analyse

von sprichworten. Berlin Studies Transnational

Journal of Science and Humanities. Vol. 1 Issue 1.5

Pedagogical sciences.

22.

Сарсенбаева З. и др. Expression of proverbs in the

present indefinite tense with translations in

Karakalpak and Russian languages //Молодой

ученый. –

2018.

№. 18. –

С. 471

-473.

23.

www.ziyonet.uz

24.

https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/bo-lajak-o-

qituvchilarni-xalqaro-baholash-dasturlari-

standartlarida-qayt-etilgan-kompetensiyalarni-

rivojlantirish

References

Ormonbekova G. Development of the competences of future teachers specified in the standards of international assessment programs. 2023. pp. 48-50. Scientific and practical conference of science and innovation. in-academy.uz; https://in-academy.uz/index.php/si/article/download/14341/9982

https://www.pedagoglar.uz/index.php/ped/article/view/6750/4787

Banks, J. A. (2009). Teaching strategies for ethnic studies (8th ed.). Pearson.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309.

Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2015). The knowledge capital of nations: Education and the economics of growth. MIT Press.

Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201-233.

Marginson, S. (2012). Global field and global imagining: Bourdieu and worldwide higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(6), 881-897.

Schleicher, A. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. OECD Publishing.

Torres, C. A. (2016). Globalizations and education: Collected essays on class, race, gender, and the state. Routledge.

Bialystok, E. (2018). Educational implications of bilingualism for language assessment. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 85-96.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175-182.

Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Routledge.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4-11.

Biesta, G. (2017). Education, measurement and the professions: Reclaiming a space for democratic professionality in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(14), 1384-1395.

OECD. (2018). Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals: Towards a vision of the teaching profession. OECD Publishing.

Tucker, M. (2011). Standing on the shoulders of giants: An American agenda for education reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31(4), 343-361.

Sarsenbaeva Z. CROSS-CULTURAL INTERPRETATION OF SYMBOLS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LITERATURE //Евразийский журнал технологий и инноваций. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 10. – С. 146-149.

Sarsenbaeva Z. J. Pedagogical possibilities for improving linguocultural competence by means of studying proverbs //Colloquium-journal. – Голопристанський міськрайонний центр зайнятості= Голопристанский районный центр занятости, 2021. – №. 5-2. – С. 22-24.

Sarsenbaeva Z. COMPARING LINGUISTIC DEVICES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK NON-REALISTIC WORKS //Молодые ученые. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 15. – С. 32-34.

Utebaev T., Sarsenbaeva Z. Sprachliche analyse von sprichworten. Berlin Studies Transnational Journal of Science and Humanities. Vol. 1 Issue 1.5 Pedagogical sciences.

Сарсенбаева З. и др. Expression of proverbs in the present indefinite tense with translations in Karakalpak and Russian languages //Молодой ученый. – 2018. – №. 18. – С. 471-473.

www.ziyonet.uz

https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/bo-lajak-o-qituvchilarni-xalqaro-baholash-dasturlari-standartlarida-qayt-etilgan-kompetensiyalarni-rivojlantirish