American Journal Of Philological Sciences
80
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue01 2025
PAGE NO.
80-82
10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue01-21
Theoretical and methodological aspects of philosophical-
anthropological analysis of the gender identity factor in
preventing domestic violence
Abdurakhmonov Rustam Bakhromdjonovich
Researcher at Fergana State University, Uzbekistan
Received:
26 October 2024;
Accepted:
28 December 2024;
Published:
30 January 2025
Abstract:
The article studies the theoretical and methodological foundations of the philosophical and
anthropological analysis of the gender identity factor in preventing domestic violence, the philosophical aspects
of ensuring gender identity in preventing domestic violence, advanced foreign experiences and priority areas, and
future tasks. It also analyzes the theoretical and methodological aspects of the philosophical and anthropological
analysis of the gender identity factor in preventing domestic violence.
Keywords:
Domestic violence, national and universal values, social laws, tradition and modernity, comparative
analysis, analysis and synthesis, systemic and functional, gender identity, philosophical and anthropological
analysis.
Introduction:
Despite the high attention paid by the
international community to the issue of domestic
violence, which is one of the global problems in the
world, the fact that such negative situations in families
do not decrease indicates that this situation remains a
topical issue that requires separate study and the need
to intensify its scientific research.
Today, preventing violence against women is one of the
most important and urgent problems. In the new
Uzbekistan, the issues of expanding the rights and
opportunities of women and protecting women from
any oppression and violence are defined as one of the
priority areas of state policy. Consequently, the
complete elimination of acts of violence alien to our
people and the protection of our women from any
oppression are among the important tasks facing us.
METHODS
Socio-philosophical, sociological aspects of preventing
domestic violence, the possibilities of a gender
approach in combating domestic violence and issues of
gender identity R. Connell, P. Bourdieu, D. Scott, V.
Spike Peterson, L. I. Amanbayeva, A. V. Belyaev, M. V.
Bogomaz, L. S. Vygotsky, D. Karpara, V. A. Sitarov, G. M.
Andreyeva, V. V. Antipov, L. P. Bogdanova, A. Varga, I.
F. Dementyeva, T. R. Kirimov, N. M. Latipova, O.
Musurmonova, N. R. Nishonova, M. Kh. Kholmatova, G.
Matkarimova, Kh. Nasrullaeva, N. Jo'rayeva, M.
Nurmatova, E. Sultonova, S. Kh. Safayeva, Sh. Sodiqova,
G. J. Ganiyeva, It has been studied in the studies of
scientists such as M.Q. Ghafforova.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
First of all, it is expedient to clarify the content,
definition, social and moral-legal foundations of the
concepts of domestic violence. In this sense, before
thinking about domestic violence, it is necessary to
understand
the content of such concepts as “violence”,
“use of force against a person”.
“Different concepts are given in the literature in various
fields
about
the
philosophical-anthropological
description, causes, conditions, nature, sociality and
signs of violence. Analysis and generalization of a
number of scientific and legal literature shows that
there is still no single concept of “violence” and
“violence” in science.” Although the concepts of
“violence” and “violence” have been paid attention to
by specialists in various fields, no single conclusion has
been reached on this matter.
First of all, “violence is a socio
-
legal concept.” “Violence
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
81
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps
American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2273)
is the physical or psychological influence of one person
on another person, which causes the violation of the
constitutionally guaranteed personal integrity of the
person.”
In some literature, violence is defined as “the use of
force, coercion, and oppression by one person against
another person. It manifests itself in the form of
physical and moral coercion or oppression of
a person.”
Also, a separate theory related to this term has been
developed in public administration
–
the “theory of
coercion.” According to him, “the theory of violence is
one of the political doctrines that explains the work of
maintaining society in obedience or carrying out the
activity of changing it by force, a theory based on views,
ideas and considerations about the emergence and
functioning of the state.”
However, as the subject of the study, domestic violence
is one of the main concepts of the criminal law sphere.
In this regard, M. Musayev and S. Niyazova specifically
note that violence is illegal. In particular, S. Niyazova
offers the following definition of the concept of
violence: “violence is a deliberate, unlawful criminal
encroachment on the safety of the victim, causing
physical or mental harm by means of physical
(energetic) or mental (informational) impact on his
div (organs, tissues and their physiological functions)
against his will (or beyond it).
Violence is an unlawful act (inaction) that violates a
person's life, health, sexual integrity, honor, dignity,
and other rights and freedoms protected by law by
means of physical, psychological, sexual, or economic
coercion or the threat of such coercion.
In general, "violence is almost always committed in the
family, and is carried out through the use of physical
force or psychological influence against a person's will
and will. When violence is used against a person,
actions are performed against his will. Domestic
violence is expressed through signs such as the illegal
use of force against a person, beating, rape, coercion,
influence, and domination. It can mainly be physical or
psychological. Psychological violence is often expressed
in the form of intimidation (the intimidation of one
person by another, the imposition of self-control, or
the making of one dependent on another).
Psychological violence is a product of nervousness and
can also be used to intimidate a person into
submission, "against his will" or "educate" him. It is
manifested in the direct application of the perpetrator
to his relatives or close people. From the point of view
of criminal law, physical violence should be considered
as physical violence of varying severity. In our opinion,
violence is a criminal activity carried out with physical
force or intimidation. In this case, the rights and
freedoms of a person are violated by threatening their
life and health. In this case, influence should be
understood as influence that is carried out against the
will of the victim and causes him obvious physical or
mental suffering, that is, violence.
“A change in the div of a person as a result of violence
that causes even slight pain and even unpleasant
sensations can also be called violence. Violence should
include not only the violation of the integrity of the
div, but also any negative behavior related to the
person. For example, laughing at a person, slander,
insulting, etc., in addition to violating the constitutional
rights of a person, are also considered psychological
violence directed at him. " In this sense, the next
problem in the anthropological understanding of the
concept of violence is related to its forms. As is known,
traditionally violence is divided into forms such as
physical and psychological violence. However, in some
literature, in addition to these two forms of violence,
sexual violence is also separately distinguished.
In our opinion, acts of physical violence include any
method of exerting force on the human div, that is,
actions that do not involve striking. For example,
pulling hair, grabbing a hand painfully, squeezing a part
of the div, causing pain, pushing, etc.
“Violence can include torture, isolation, coercion or
incitement to act against one’s will, detention, rape,
touching, humiliation, and humiliation. In our opinion,
“criminal violence in the family should be understood
as an act or inaction by one member of the family
against another member, aimed at exercising his or her
dominance by violating his or her life, health, freedom,
sexual integrity, honor, dignity, and other inviolable
rights and legitimate interests protected by law.”
There are the following types of criminal violence in the
family:
“Physical violence can take the form of inflicting various
degrees of bodily injury on the victim, beating, using
physical force, killing the victim’s relatives, loved ones,
violating their honor, etc.” In this case, one family
member intentionally commits acts against another
member that endanger his life, health or various parts
of his div, and manifests itself in the following ways:
slapping, kicking, pushing, punching; pushing with a
strong blow; throwing various sharp objects and things;
threatening or wounding with a weapon; physically
preventing him from leaving the house; not letting him
sleep at night.
Psychological violence is “the use of physical force
against the victim, the destruction or damage of
property, and the intimidation of the victim to disclose
information that the victim wishes to remain
confidential, etc.” Psychological violence
and physical
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
82
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps
American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2273)
violence can only have consequences when they are
mutually exclusive and complement each other. This is
manifested in the intentional use of words and actions
by one family member to influence the psyche of
another member by belittling his honor and dignity, by
taking actions that suppress his feelings, by
intimidating and insulting him, and by causing damage
to his psyche: not recognizing feelings and emotions;
laughing at him; ignoring his feelings as a punishment;
telling lies and using him for his own benefit;
threatening her friends and relatives with danger and
preventing them from contacting her; refusing to go
out with her in public places; taking control of the
family budget; shaming her among relatives;
threatening to leave the house; refusing to help her
when she is sick or pregnant, and resisting her from
seeking medical care.
Domestic sexual violence is defined as the violation of
a person’s sexual integrity and freedom by means of
coercive actions or threats of violence. For example
, “a
man’s treatment of his wife as a sexual object; refusal
of sexual intercourse or aggressive behavior towards a
woman; forced sexual acts; extremely cruel sexual acts;
forced sexual intercourse through rape; first beating
and then sexual intercourse; forced viewing or
repeating pornographic acts, etc.”
Economic violence is an action (inaction) that restricts
the right of women to food, housing and other
necessary conditions for a normal life and
development, property rights, education and the right
to work. This type of violence involves using one's
money to control one's partner. This includes refusing
to support children, making financial decisions solely
for oneself, creating a situation where the partner
demands money and provides full information about
any expenses, hiding income, spending money that
belongs to the family, not allowing or forcing them to
work, taking away earned money, etc. In this case, for
example, when buying food, the needs of children or
women are not taken into account, which means that
they are deprived of vitamins typical for their age; the
wife, when making purchases, is obliged to provide
information along with payment receipts, etc.
CONCLUSION
It would be more correct to describe violence as an
influence on a person against his will, because when
the victim shows his will, the abuser acts against him,
and this is not always the case. In many cases, the
perpetrator disregards the will of the victim; thirdly, the
threat of violence cannot be limited to the threat of
physical harm. The psyche is affected not only by the
threat of physical harm, but also by other interests,
often no less important than the deprivation of health
and even life (for example, honor, dignity, freedom,
reputation, property); fourthly, the view of violence as
a direct impact on the will of a person seems too
narrow today.
REFERENCES
Belov G. History is a science of philosophy. -Moscow:
Izdatelsky dom MGU, 2012. -432 p
Weber M. Nauka kak prizvanie i profession // M.
Weber. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. - M.: Progress, 1990.
–
456 p
Jabbarov I. A place of high culture and unique
spirituality. -Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 2012. - 316 p
Niyozova S.S. Victimological theory of violent crimes
against the person (Monograph). - T. : TDYuI, 2011.
–
B.
36.
Orlova E. Introduction to social and cultural
anthropology. - Moscow: 1994. - 384 p
Otamuratov S. Globalization and the nation. -Tashkent:
Yangi asr avlod, 2008.
–
204 p
Rustambaev M.Kh. Criminal law: Special part. T.: TDUI,
2006.
–
P. 42.
Takhirov F. Responsibility for sexual crimes in some
foreign countries / Editor-in-chief: Doctor of Law,
Professor M.H. Rustamboev.
–
T: TDUI, 2009.
–
P. 95
–
96.
